Respective demands of task and function allocation on human-machine co-operation design: A psychological approach

Connection Science

Volumn 14, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 283-295

  Hoc, Jean Michel ^a   Debernard, Serge ^b  

^a CNRS   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE VALENCIENNES   (France)

Author keywords

Dynamic function delegation; Dynamic task allocation; Human machine co operation; Human machine system design

Indexed keywords

DYNAMIC TASK ALLOCATION;

AUTONOMOUS AGENTS; COSTS; SYSTEMS ANALYSIS;

MAN MACHINE SYSTEMS;

EID: 0036986860     PISSN: 09540091     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0954009021000068745     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Bainbridge, L., 1987, Ironies of automation. In J. Rasmussen, K. D. Duncan and J. Leplat (eds) New Technology and Human Error (Chichester: Wiley), pp. 271-284.
2. Bentley, R., Rodden, T., Sawyer, P., and Sommerville, I., 1992, An architecture for tailoring cooperative muti-user display. In Proceedings of CSCW'92 (New York: ACM Press), pp. 187-194.
3. Cannon-Bowers, J. A., Salas, E., and Converse, S. A., 1993, Shared mental model in expert decision making teams. In N. J. Castellan, Jr. (ed.) Current Issues in Individual and Group Decision Making (Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates), pp. 221-246.
4. Castelfranchi, C., 1998, Modelling social action for agents. Artificial Intelligence, 103: 157-182.
5. Clark, H. H., 1996, Using Language (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
6. Debernard, S., Cathelain, S., Crevits, I., and Poulain, T., 2002, AMANDA project: delegation of tasks in the air traffic control domain. In M. Blay-Fornarino, A. M. Pinna-Dery, K. Schmidt and P. Zaraté (eds) Cooperative Systems Design (Amsterdam: IOS Press), pp. 173-190.
7. Decortis, F., and Pavard, B., 1994, Communication et coopération: de la théorie des actes de langage à l'approche ethnométhodologique [Communication and cooperation: from language acts theory to ethnomethodological approach]. In B. Pavard (ed.) Systèmes Coopératifs: De la Modélisation à la Conception (Toulouse: Octarès), pp. 21-50.
8. Fitts, P. M., 1951, Human Engineering for an Effective Air Navigation and Traffic Control System (Washington, DC: National Research Council).
9. Hoc, J. M., 1988, Cognitive Psychology of Planning (London: Academic Press).
10. Hoc, J. M., 2000, From human-machine interaction to human-machine cooperation. Ergonomics, 43: 833-843.
11. Hoc, J. M., 2001, Towards a cognitive approach to human-machine cooperation in dynamic situations. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 54: 509-540.
12. Hoc, J. M., and Amalberti, R., 1995, Diagnosis: some theoretical questions raised by applied research. Current Psychology of Cognition, 14: 73-101.
13. Hoc, J. M., and Carlier, X., 2002, Role of a common frame of reference in cognitive cooperation: sharing tasks between agents in air traffic control. Cognition, Work, & Technology, 4: 37-47.
14. Hoc, J. M., and Lemoine, M. P., 1998, Cognitive evaluation of human-human and human-machine cooperation modes in air traffic control. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 8: 1-32.
15. Hollnagel, E., and Woods, D. D., 1983, Cognitive systems engineering: new wine in new bottles. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 18: 583-600.
16. Jentsch, F., Barnett, J., Bowers, C., and Salas, E., 1999, Who is flying this plane anyway? What mishaps tell us about crew member role assignment and air crew situation awareness. Human Factors, 41: 1-14.
17. Jones, P. M., and Jasek, C. A., 1997, Intelligent support for activity management (ISAM): an architecture to support distributed supervisory control. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans, 27: 274-288.
18. Kaber, D. B., Riley, J. M., Tan, K. W., and Endsley, M., 2001, On the design of adaptive automation for complex systems. International Journal of Cognitive Ergonomics, 5: 37-57.
19. Klein, G. A., Orasanu, J., Calderwood, R., and Zsambok, C. E., 1993, Decision-Making in Action: Models and Method (Norwood NJ: Ablex).
20. McCarthy, J. C., Fallon, E., and Bannon, L., 2000, Dialogues on function allocation. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 52 (2).
21. Millot, P., and Mandiau, R., 1995, Man-machine cooperative organizations: formal and pragmatic implementation methods. In J. M. Hoc, P. C. Cacciabue and E. Hollnagel (eds) Expertise and Technology: Cognition & Human-Computer Cooperation (Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates) pp. 213-228.
22. Nass, C., Fogg, B. J., and Moon, Y., 1996, Can computers be teammates? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 45: 669-678.
23. Older, M. T., Waterson, P. E., and Clegg, C. W., 1997, A critical assessment of task allocation methods and their applicability. Ergonomics, 40: 151-171.
24. Pacaux-Lemoine, M. P., and Debernard, S., 2002, Common work space for human-machine cooperation in air traffic control. Control Engineering Practice, 10: 571-576.
25. Parasuraman, R., 1997, Humans and automation: Use, misuse, disuse, abuse. Human Factors, 39: 230-253.
26. Rasmussen, J., 1983, Skill, rules, and knowledge: signals, signs and symbols, and other distinctions in human performance models. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 15: 257-266.
27. Rieger, C. A., and Greenstein, J. S., 1982, The allocation of tasks between the human and computer in automated systems. In Proceedings of the IEEE 1982 International Conference on 'Cybernetics and Society' (New York: IEEE), pp. 204-208.
28. Schmidt, K., 1991, Cooperative work: a conceptual framework. In J. Rasmussen, B. Brehmer and J. Leplat (eds) Distributed Decision-Making: Cognitive Models for Cooperative Work (Chichester: Wiley), pp. 75-110.
29. Vanderhaegen, F., Crevits, I., Debernard, S., and Millot, P., 1994, Human-machine cooperation: toward and activity regulation assistance for different air-traffic control levels. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 6: 65-104.