Selective hippocampal lesions disrupt a novel cue effect but fail to eliminate blocking in rabbit eyeblink conditioning

Cognitive, Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience

Volumn 2, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 318-328

  Allen, M Todd ^a   Padilla, Yahaira ^b   Myers, Catherine E ^b   Gluck, Mark A ^b  

^a School of Business   (United States)

^b RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

IBOTENIC ACID;

ADAPTATION; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; BRAIN INJURY; CONDITIONING; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORNEA; EYELID REFLEX; HIPPOCAMPUS; HISTOLOGY; LEARNING; MALE; NONHUMAN; RABBIT; STEREOTAXIC SURGERY; ANIMAL; ASSOCIATION; BLINKING; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONDITIONED REFLEX; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; PHYSIOLOGY;

ANIMALS; BLINKING; CONDITIONING, CLASSICAL; CONDITIONING, EYELID; CUES; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; HIPPOCAMPUS; MALE; RABBITS;

EID: 0036985780     PISSN: 15307026     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/CABN.2.4.318     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. ALLEN, M. T., CHELIUS, L., & GLUCK, M. A. (2002). Selective entorhinal lesions and nonselective cortical-hippocampal region lesions, but not selective hippocampal lesions, disrupt learned irrelevance in rabbit eyeblink conditioning. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 2, 214-226.
2. ALLEN, M. T., MYERS, C. E., & GLUCK, M. A. (2001). Parallel neural systems for stimulus selection in classical conditioning: Support from computational modeling. Integrative Physiological & Behavioral Science, 36, 36-61.
3. ALLEN, M. T., PADILLA, Y., & GLUCK, M. A. (2002). Ibotenic acid lesions of the medial septum retard delay eyeblink conditioning in rabbits. Behavioral Neuroscience, 116, 733-738.
4. BAXTER M. G., GALLAGHER M., & HOLLAND P. C. (1999). Blocking can occur without losses in attention in rats with selective removal of hippocampal cholinergic input. Behavioral Neuroscience, 113, 881-890.
5. BUHUSI, C. V., & SCHMAJUK, N. A. (1996). Attention, configuration, and hippocampal function. Hippocampus, 6, 621-642.
6. BUNSEY, M., & EICHENBAUM, H. (1993). Critical role for the parahippocampal region for paired-associate learning in rats. Behavioral Neuroscience, 107, 740-747.
7. CHAN, K.-H., MORELL, J. R., JARRARD, L. E., & DAVIDSON, T. L. (2001). Reconsideration of the role of the hippocampus in learned inhibition. Behavioural Brain Research, 119, 111-130.
8. CHEN, G., & STEINMETZ, J. E. (1998). A general-purpose computer system for behavioral conditioning and neural recording experiments. Behavioral Research Methods. Instruments, & Computers, 30, 384-391.
9. DOUGLAS, R. J. (1967). The hippocampus and behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 67, 416-442.
10. DOUGLAS, R. J., & PRIBRAM, K. (1966). Learning and limbic lesions. Neuropsychologia, 4, 192-222.
11. EICHENBAUM, H. (1999). The hippocampus: The shock of the new. Current Biology, 9, R482-R484.
12. FANSELOW, M. S. (1998). Pavlovian conditioning, negative feedback, and blocking: Mechanisms that regulate association formation. Neuron, 20, 625-627.
13. GLUCK, M. A., ALLEN, M. T., MYERS, C. E., & THOMPSON, R. F. (2001). Cerebellar substrates for error-correction in motor conditioning. Neurobiology of Learning & Memory, 76, 314-341.
14. GLUCK, M. A., & MYERS, C. E. (1993). Hippocampal mediation of stimulus representation: A computational theory. Hippocampus, 3, 491-516.
15. GORMEZANO, I., KEHOE, E. J., & MARSHALL, B. S. (1983). Twenty years of classical conditioning research with the rabbit. Progress in Psychobiology & Physiological Psychology 10, 197-275.
16. GROSSBERG, W., & MERRILL, J. W. L. (1992). A neural network model of adaptively timed reinforcement learning and hippocampal dynamics. Cognitive Brain Research, 1, 3-38.
17. HASSELMO, M. E., & WYBLE, B. P. (1997). Free recall and recognition in a network model of the hippocampus: Simulating effects of scopolamine on human memory. Behavioural Brain Research. 89, 1-34.
18. HOLLAND, P. C. (1997). Brain mechanisms for changes in processing of conditioned stimuli in Pavlovian conditioning: Implications for behavior theory. Animal Learning & Behavior, 25, 373-399.
19. JARRARD, L. (1989). On the use of ibotenic acid to lesion selectively different components of the hippocampal formation. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 29, 251-259.
20. KAMIN, L. (1969). Predictability, surprise, attention and conditioning. In B. Campbell & R. Church (Eds.), Punishment and aversive behavior (pp. 279-296). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
21. KIM, J. J., KRUPA, D. J., & THOMPSON, R. F. (1998). Inhibitory cerebello-olivary projections and blocking effect in classical conditioning. Science, 279, 570-573.
22. KIMBLE, D. P. (1968). Hippocampus and internal inhibition. Psychological Bulletin, 70, 285-295.
23. KINKAIDE, P. S. (1974). Stimulus selection in eyelid conditioning in the rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus). Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology, 86, 1132-1140.
24. MACKINTOSH, N. J. (1973). Stimulus selection: Learning to ignore stimuli that predict no change in reinforcement. In R. Hinde & J. Stevenson-Hinde (Eds.), Constraints on learning: Limitations and predispositions (pp. 75-96). New York: Academic Press.
25. MACKINTOSH, N. J., & TURNER, C. (1971). Blocking as a function of novelty of CS and predictability of UCS. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 23, 359-366.
26. MARCHANT, H. G., III, & MOORE, J. W. (1973). Blocking of the rabbit's conditioned nictitating membrane response in Kamin's two-stage paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 101, 153-158.
27. MENON, V., WHITE, C. D., ELIEZ, S., GLOVER, G. H., & REISS, A. L. (2000). Analysis of a distributed neural system involved in spatial information, novelty, and memory processing. Human Brain Mapping, 11, 117-129.
28. MILLER, R. R., & MATZEL, R. D. (1988). The comparator hypothesis: A response rule for the expression of associations. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), Psychology of learning and motivation (pp. 51-92). New York: Academic Press.
29. MYERS, C. E., GLUCK, M. A., & GRANGER, R. (1995). Dissociation of hippocampal and entorhinal function in associative learning: A computational approach. Psychobiology, 23, 116-138.
30. PRIBRAM, K. H. (1986). Preface. In R. L. Isaacson & K. H. Pribram (Eds.), The hippocampus (Vol. 4, pp. vii-xiii). New York: Plenum.
31. RESCORLA, R., & WAGNER, A. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and non-reinforcement. In A. H. Black & W. F. Prokasy (Eds.), Classical conditioning II: Current research and theory (pp. 64-99). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
32. SCHMAJUK, N. A., & BUHUSI, C. V. (1997). Stimulus configuration, occasion setting, and the hippocampus. Behavioral Neuroscience, 111, 235-258.
33. SCHMALTZ, L. W., & THEIOS, J. (1972). Acquisition and extinction of a classically conditioned response in hippocampectomized rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus). Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology, 79, 328-333.
34. SHOHAMY, D., ALLEN, M. T., & GLUCK, M. A. (2000). Dissociating entorhinal and hippocampal function in latent inhibition. Behavioral Neuroscience, 114, 867-874.
35. SOLOMON, P. R. (1977). Role of the hippocampus in blocking and conditioned inhibition of the rabbit's nictitating membrane response. Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology, 91, 407-417.
36. SOLOMON, P. R. (1980). A time and place for everything? Temporal processing views of hippocampal function with special reference to attention. Physiological Psychology, 8, 254-261.
37. SOLOMON, P. R., & MOORE, J.W. (1975). Latent inhibition and stimulus generalization of the classically conditioned nictitating membrane response in rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus) following hippocampal ablation. Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology, 89, 1192-1203.
38. SQUIRE, L. R. (1992). Memory and the hippocampus: A synthesis from findings with rats, monkeys, and humans. Psychological Review, 99, 195-231.
39. THOMPSON, L. T., MOYER, J. R., AKASE, E., & DISTERHOFT, J. F. (1994). A system for quantitative analysis of associative learning: Pt. 1. Hardware interfaces with cross-species applications. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 54, 109-117.
40. THOMPSON, R. F. (1986). The neurobiology of learning and memory. Science, 233, 941-947.
41. VINOGRADOVA, O. S. (2001). Hippocampus as comparator: Role of the two input two output systems of the hippocampus in selection and registration of information. Hippocampus, 11, 578-598.