Black sheep effect and ingroup favoritism in social identity perspective

Japanese Journal of Psychology

Volumn 73, Issue 5, 2002, Pages 405-411

  Oishi, Chitose ^a   Yoshida, Fujio ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TSUKUBA   (Japan)

Author keywords

Black sheep effect; Distribution matrices; Ingroup favoritism; Social identity

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; FEMALE; GROUP PROCESS; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; FEMALE; GROUP PROCESSES; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; SOCIAL IDENTIFICATION;

EID: 0036985485     PISSN: 00215236     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4992/jjpsy.73.405     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Billig, M., & Tajfel, H. 1973 Social categorization and similarity in intergroup behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology, 3, 27-52.
2. Bornstein, G., Crum, L., Wittenbraker, J., Harring, K., Insko, C. A., & Thibaut, J. 1983 On the measurement of social orientations in the minimal group paradigm. European Journal of Social Psychology, 13, 321-350.
3. Branscombe, N. R., Wann, D. L., Noel, J. G., & Coleman, J. 1993 In-group or out-group extremity: Importance of the threatened social identity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 381-388
4. Devos, T., Comby, L., & Deschamps, J.-C. 1996 Asymmetries in judgements of ingroup and outgroup variability. European Review of Social Psychology, 7, 95-144.
5. Diehl, M. 1990 The minimal group paradigm: Theoretical explanations and empirical findings. European Review of Social Psychology, 1, 263-292.
6. (Hayashi, F. 1978 The fondamental dimensions of interpersonal cognitive structure. Bulletin of the Faculty of education: The department of educational psychology, 25, 233-247.)
7. (Inoue, M., & Kobayashi, T. 1985 The research domain and scale construction of adjective-pairs in a semantic differential method in Japan. Japanese Journal of Educational Psychology, 33, 253-260.)
8. Karasawa, M. 1991 Toward an assessment of social identity: The structure of group identification and its effects on in-group evaluations. British Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 293-307.
9. Khan, S., & Lambert, A. 1998 Ingroup favoritism versus black sheep effects in observations of informal conversations. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 20, 263-269.
10. Linville, P. W. 1982 The complexity-extremity effect and age-based stereotyping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 193-211.
11. Marques, J. M., Abrams, D., Paez, D., & Martinez-Taboada, C. 1998 The role of categorization and in-group norms in judgments of groups and their members. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 976-988.
12. Marques, J. M., Robalo, E. M., & Rocha, S. A. 1992 Ingroup bias and the 'black sheep effect': Assesing the inpact of social identification and perceived variability on group judgements. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 331-352.
13. Marques, J. M., & Yzerbyt, V. Y. 1988 The black sheep effect: Judgmental extremity towards ingroup members in inter- and intra-group situations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 287-292.
14. Marques, J. M., Yzerbyt, V Y., & Leyens, J. P. 1988 The 'black sheep' effect: extremity of judgements towards in-group members as a function of group identification. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 1-16.
15. (Oishi, C., & Konno, H 2000 Black sheep effect and ingroup favoritism: Using category labels and descriptions to present group members. Tsukuba Psychological Research, 22, 105-112.)
16. Tajfel, H. 1978 Differentiation between social groups. London: Academic Press.
17. Tajfel, H., Billig, M., Bundy, R. P., & Flament, C. 1971 Social categorization and intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1, 149-177.