Stereopsis from contrast envelopes

Vision Research

Volumn 39, Issue 14, 1999, Pages 2313-2324

  Langley, Keith ^a   Fleet, David J ^b   Hibbard, Paul B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b QUEEN S UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Depth asymmetry; Multiplicative transparency; Second order stereopsis

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BRAIN CORTEX; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; DEPTH PERCEPTION; GRATING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NONLINEAR SYSTEM; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STEREOSCOPIC VISION; VISUAL ORIENTATION; VISUAL STIMULATION; VISUAL THRESHOLD;

ADAPTATION, OCULAR; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; DEPTH PERCEPTION; HUMANS; MALE; MATHEMATICS; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PSYCHOPHYSICS; SENSORY THRESHOLDS; VISION DISPARITY;

EID: 0033007936     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0042-6989(98)00271-5     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Blake R., Wilson H. Neural models of stereoscopic vision. Trends in Neuroscience. 14:1991;445-452.
2. Beck J., Prazdny K., Ivry R. The perception of transparency with achromatic colors. Perception and Psychophysics. 5:1984;407-422.
3. Beck, J. (1984). Perception of transparency in man and machine. Human and Machine Vision II, 1-12.
4. Blakemore C., Hague B. Evidence for disparity detecting neurons in the human visual system. Journal of Physiology. 225:1972;437-455.
5. Brown R.O. Luminance nonlinearities and 2nd order stimuli. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science (Suppl.). 36:1995;51.
6. Burton G.J. Evidence for non-linear response process in the visual system from measurements on the thresholds of spatial beat frequencies. Vision Research. 13:1973;1211-1255.
7. Chubb C., Sperling G. Drift-balanced random-stimuli: a general basis for studying non-Fourier motion perception. Journal of the Optical Society of America A. 5:1988;1986-2007.
8. Cormack L.K., Stevenson S.B., Schor C.M. Interocular correlation, luminance contrast and cyclopean processing. Vision Research. 31:1991;2195-2207.
9. DeAngelis G.C., Ohzawa I., Freeman R.D. Neuronal mechanisms underlying stereopsis: how do simple cells in the visual cortex encode binocular disparity? Perception. 24:1995;3-32.
10. Derrington A.M., Badcock D.R. Detection of spatial beats: nonlinearity or contrast increment detection? Vision Research. 26:1986;343-348.
11. De Valois R.L., De Valois K.K. Spatial vision. 1990;Oxford University Press, Oxford.
12. Fleet D.J, Langley K. Computational analysis of non-Fourier motion. Vision Research. 34:1994;3057-3079.
13. Fleet D.J., Langley K. Non-Fourier channels in motion and stereopsis. Perception (Suppl.). 23:1994;83.
14. Fleet D.J., Wagner H., Heeger D.J. Neural encoding of binocular disparity: energy models, position-shifts and phase-shifts. Vision Research. 36:1996;1839-1857.
15. Franks L. Signal analysis. 1969;Prentice-Hall, NJ.
16. Frisby J.P., Mayhew J.E.W. The relationship between apparent depth and disparity in rivalrous-texture stereograms. Perception. 7:1978;661-678.
17. Georgeson M. Temporal properties of spatial contrast vision. Vision Research. 27:1987;765-780.
18. Halpern D.L. Stereopsis from motion defined contours. Vision Research. 31:1991;1611-1620.
19. Harris J.M., Smallman H.S. Visual distortion products from an expansive nonlinearity. Perception (Suppl.). 24:1995;126.
20. Henning G.B., Hertz G.B., Broadbent B.E. Some experiments bearing on the hypothesis that the visual system analyses patterns in independent bands of spatial frequency. Vision Research. 15:1975;887-897.
21. Hess R.F., Wilcox L.M. Linear and non-linear filtering in stereopsis. Vision Research. 34:1994;2431-2438.
22. Hibbard P.B., Langley K., Fleet D.J. Transparent asymmetry in stereopsis. Perception (Suppl.). 24:1995;35.
23. Hibbard, P.B. (1997) Linear and nonlinear mechanisms in the perception of stereoscopic slant and transparency. Ph.D Thesis, Department of Experimental Psychology, University College London.
24. Hubel D.H. Eye, brain and vision. 1988;Scientific American Books, New York.
25. Kersten D. Transparency and cooperative computation of scene attributes. Landy M., Movshon J.A. Computational models of visual processing. 1991;209-228 MIT Press, London.
26. Langley K., Hibbard P.B. Multiplicative/additive combination rules towards transparent stereoscopic slant perception. Perception. 23:1994;33.
27. Langley, K. (1997) Degenerate models of multiplicative and additive motion transparency, vol. 2 (pp. 440-450). Proceedings of the British Machine Vision Conference, Colchester, UK.
28. Langley K. Computational models of coherent and transparent plaid motion. Vision Research. 39(1):1999;87-108.
29. Langley K., Fleet D.J., Hibbard P.B. Linear filtering precedes nonlinear processing in early vision. Current Biology. 6:1996;891-896.
30. Langley K., Fleet D.J., Hibbard P.B. Linear and nonlinear transparencies in stereopsis. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B. 265:1998;1837-1845.
31. Laughlin S.B. Matching coding, circuits, cells and molecules to signals: general principles of retinal design in the flys eye. Progress in Retinal and Eye Research. 13:1994;165-195.
32. Liu L., Schor C.W., Ramachandran V.S. Positional disparity is more efficient in encoding depth than phase disparity. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science (Suppl.). 33:1992;1373.
33. Lin L., Wilson H.R. Stereoscopic integration of Fourier and non-Fourier patterns. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science (Suppl.). 36:1995;364.
34. Mallot H.A., Arndt P.A., Bulthoff H.H. Matching versus correlation in human stereopsis. Biological Cylbernetics. 72:1995;279-293.
35. Mareschal I., Baker C.L. Jr A cortical locus for the processing of contrast defined contours. Nature Neuroscience. 1:1998;150-154.
36. Metelli F. The perception of transparency. Scientific American. 230:1974;90-98.
37. Ohzawa I., DeAngelis G.C., Freeman R.D. Stereoscopic depth discrimination in the visual cortex: neurons ideally suited as disparity detectors. Science. 249:1990;1037-1040.
38. Poggio G.F., Poggio T. The analysis of stereopsis. Annual Review of Neuroscience. 7:1984;379-412.
39. Parker A.J., Johnston E.B., Mansfield J.S, Yang Y. Stereo, surfaces, and shape. Landy M.S., Movshon J.A. Computational models of visual processing. 1991;359-381 MIT, London.
40. Sato T., Nishida S. Second-order depth perception with texture-defined random-dot stereograms. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science (Suppl.). 34:1993;1438.
41. Sato T., Nishida S. Does an envelope detecting mechanism mediate stereopsis for band-limited stimuli? Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science (Suppl.). 35:1994;1916.
42. Sclar G., Maunsell J.H.R., Lennie P. Coding of image contrast in central visual pathways of the macaque monkey. Vision Research. 30:1990;1-10.
43. Scott-Samuel N.E., Georgeson M. Does an early nonlinearity account forsecond-order motion? Perception (Suppl.). 24:1995;104.
44. Schwartz, M. (1987). Information transmission, modulation and noise (3rd ed). London: McGraw-Hill.
45. Turano K., Pantle A. On the mechanism that encodes the movement of contrast information. Vision Research. 29:1989;207-221.
46. Victor J.D., Conte M.M. Coherence and transparency of moving plaids composed of Fourier and non-Fourier gratings. Perception and Psychophysics. 52:1992;403-414.
47. Watt R., Andrews D.P. Adaptive probit estimation of psychometric functions. Current Psychological Reviews. 1:1981;205-214.
48. Weinshall D. Seeing 'ghost' planes in stereo vision. Vision Research. 31:1991;1731-1749.
49. max for stereopsis depends on size, not spatial frequency content. Vision Research. 35:1995;1061-1069.
50. Wilcox L.M., Hess R.F. Is the site of nonlinear filtering in stereopsis before or after binocular combination. Vision Research. 36:1996;391-399.
51. Wilcox L.M., Hess R.F. Scale selection for second-order (non-linear) stereopsis. Vision Research. 37:1997;2981-2992.
52. Wilson H.R., Ferrera V.P., Yo C. A psychophysically motivated model for two-dimensional motion perception. Visual Neuroscience. 9:1992;79-97.
53. Wurger S.M., Landy M.S. Depth interpolation with sparse disparity cues. Perception. 18:1989;39-54.
54. Zanker M.J. Theta motion: a paradoxical stimulus to explore higher-order motion extraction. Vision Research. 33:1993;553-569.