Balancing agricultural development and deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon

Research Report of the International Food Policy Research Institute

Volumn , Issue 129, 2002, Pages 1-146

  Cattaneo, Andrea ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT; DEFORESTATION; LOGGING (TIMBER); NATURE-SOCIETY RELATIONS; RANCHING; RESOURCE DEPLETION;

AMAZONIA; BRAZIL;

EID: 0036976095     PISSN: 08867372     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (179)

1. Abbink, G. A., M. C. Braber, and S. I. Cohen. 1995. A SAM-CGE demonstration model for Indonesia: Static and dynamic specifications and experiments. International Economic Journal 9(3): 15-33.
2. Acevedo, M. F.; D. L. Urban, and M. Ablan. 1995. Transition and gap models of forest dynamics. Ecological Applications 5(4): 1040-1055.
3. Almeida, O. T., and C. Uhl. 1995. Developing a quantitative framework for sustainable resource-use planning in the Brazilian Amazon. World Development 23(10): 1745-1764.
4. Alston, L. J., G. D. Libecap, and B. Mueller. 1999. Theory and applications. A model of rural conflict: Violence and land reform policy in Brazil. Environment and Development Economics 4(2): 135-160.
5. Alston, L. J., G. D. Libecap, and R. Schneider. 1996. The determinants and impact of property rights: Land titles on the Brazilian frontier. National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) Working Paper Series No. 5405. Cambridge, Mass.: NBER.
6. Alves, D. S. 2002. An analysis of the geographical patterns of deforestation in Brazilian Amazonia in the 1991-1996 period. In Land use and deforestation in the Amazon, eds. C. H. Wood and R. Porro, Gainesville, Florida: University Press of Florida.
7. Alves, D. 2001. O processo de desmatamento na Amazônia. Parcerias Estratégicas, Vol.12: 259-275.
8. Andersen, L. E. 1996. The causes of deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon. Journal of Environment & Development 5(3): 309-328.
9. Andersson, K. 1987. Taxation of capital in Sweden-A general equilibrium model. Ph.D. diss., University of Lund, Lund, Sweden.
10. Arima, E.Y., and C. Uhl. 1997. Ranching in the Brazilian Amazon in a national context: Economics, policy, and practice. Society and Natural Resources 10(5): 433-451.
11. Auerbach, A., and L. Kotlikoff. 1983. National savings, economic welfare, and the structure of taxation. In Behavioral simulation methods in tax policy analysis, ed. M. Feldstein. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
12. Aylward, B. A. 1993. The economic value of pharmaceutical prospecting and its role in biodiversity conservation. Discussion Paper 93-05. London: London Environmental Economics Centre, International Institute for Environment and Development.
13. Azis, I. J. 1997. Impacts of economic reform on rural-urban welfare: A general equilibrium framework. Review of Urban and Regional Development Studies 9(1): 1-19.
14. Baker, W. L. 1989. A review of models of landscape change. Landscape Ecology 2(2): 111-133.
15. Ballard, C. 1983. Evaluation of the consumption tax with dynamic general equilibrium models. Ph.D. diss., Stanford University, Stanford, Calif., USA.
16. Ballard, C., and L. Goulder. 1985. Consumption taxes, foresight, and welfare: A computational general equilibrium analysis. In New developments in applied general equilibrium analysis, ed. J. Piggott and J. Whalley. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
17. Barbier, E. B. 2001. The economics of tropical deforestation and land use: An introduction to the Special Issue. Land Economics 77(2): 155-171.
18. Bell, C. L. G., and T. N. Srinivasan. 1984. On the uses and abuses of economy-wide models in development policy analysis. In Economic structure and performance, ed. M. Syrquin, L. Taylor, and L. E. Westphal. New York: Academic.
19. Benjamin, N. 1996. Adjustment and income distribution in an agricultural economy: A general equilibrium analysis of Cameroon. World Development 24(6): 1003-1013.
20. Bergman, L. 1988. Energy policy modeling: A survey of general equilibrium approaches. Journal of Policy Modeling 10(3): 377-400.
21. Bergman, L. 1991. General equilibrium effects of environmental policy: A CGE modeling approach. Environmental and Resource Economics 1(1): 43-61.
22. Bhattacharyya, S. C. 1996. Applied general equilibrium models for energy studies: A survey. Energy Economics 18(3): 145-164.
23. Binswanger, H.P. 1991. Brazilian policies that encourage deforestation in the Amazon. World Development 19(7): 821-829.
24. Bourguignon, F., W. Branson, and J. de Melo. 1992. Adjustment and income distribution: A micro-macro model for counterfactual analysis. Journal of Development Economics 38: 17-39.
25. Bovenberg, L. 1984. Capital accumulation and capital immobility: Q-theory in a dynamic general equilibrium framework. Ph.D. diss., University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, Calif.
26. Bovenberg, L. 1985. Dynamic general equilibrium tax models with adjustment costs. In Economic equilibrium: Model formulation and solution. Mathematical programming study, ed. A. Manne. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
27. Brazil, Ministry of Agrarian Development. 1999. The white book of illegal land appropriation in Brazil.
28. Brazil, Ministry of Labor. 2000. Relação annual de informações sociais (RAIS) (on-line database) http://www.mtb.gov.br/Temas/RAIS/Estatisticas/Contendo.RaisOnLine.asp.
29. Brito, F., and T. Merrick. 1974. Migração, absorção de mão-de-obra e distribução da renda. Estudos Econômicos 4: 75-122.
30. Browder, J. O. 1988. Public policy and deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon. In Public policies and the misuse of forest resources, ed. R. Repetto and U. Gillis. Boston: Cambridge University Press.
31. Brown, D. K. 1992. The impact of a North American free trade area: Applied general equilibrium models. In North American free trade: Assessing the impact, ed. N. Lustig, B. P. Bosworth, and R. Z. Lawrence. Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution.
32. Burnham, B. O. 1973. Markov intertemporal land use simulation model. Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics 5: 25-38.
33. Carpentier, C. L., S. A. Vosti, and J. Witcover. Forthcoming. BrasilBEM: A household-farm bioeconomic model for the western Brazilian Amazon forest margin. Environment and Production Technology Division Discussion Paper. International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, D.C.
34. Carraro, C., M. Galeotti, and M. Gallo. 1996. Environmental taxation and unemployment: Some evidence on the "double dividend hypothesis" in Europe. Journal of Public Economics 62(1): 141-182.
35. Carvalho, G. O., A. C. Barros, P. Moutinho, and D. Nepstad. 2001. Letter to the editor: Sensitive development could protect Amazonia instead of destroying it. Nature 409: 131.
36. Cattaneo, A. 2001. Deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon: Comparing the impacts of macroeconomic shocks, land tenure, and technological change. Land Economics 77(2): 219-240.
37. Chomitz, K. M., and T. Thomas. 2000. Geographic patterns of land use and land intensity in the Brazilian Amazon. Working Paper. Development Research Group, the World Bank, Washington, D.C.
38. Convênio INCRA/CRUB/UnB (Instituto Nacional de Colonização e Reforma Agraria, Conselho de Reitores das Universidades Brasileiras, and Universidade de Brasilia). 1997. Censo da reforma agrária no Brasil (summary of a meeting). Estudos avançados 11(31): 7-36.
39. Cottle, R. W., and G. B. Dantzig. 1970. A generalization of the linear complementarity problem. Journal of Combinatorial Theory 8 (1): 79-90.
40. Cottle, R. W., J. Pang, and R. E. Stone. 1992. The linear complementarity problem. Boston : Academic Press.
41. Coxhead, I., and S. Jayasuriya. 1994. Technical change in agriculture and land degradation in developing countries: A general equilibrium analysis. Land Economics 70 (1): 20-37.
42. Coxhead, I., and G. Shively. 1995. Measuring the environmental impacts of economic changes: The case of land degradation in Philippine agriculture. University of Wisconsin-Madison, Staff Paper Series No. 384. Madison, Wisc.: University of Wisconsin-Madison.
43. Coxhead, I., and P. Warr. 1991. Technical change, land quality, and income distribution: A general equilibrium analysis. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 73(2): 345-360.
44. Cruz, W., and R. Repetto. 1992. The environmental effects of stabilization and structural adjustment programs: The Philippine case. Washington, D.C.: World Resources Institute.
45. Darwin, R., M. E. Tsigas, J. Lewandrowski, and A. Raneses. 1995. World agriculture and climate change: Economic adaptations. USDA Agricultural Economic Report No. 703. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Agriculture.
46. Deacon, R. 1994. Deforestation and the rule of law in a cross-section of countries. Land Economics 70(4): 414-430.
47. Deacon, R. 1999. Deforestation and ownership: Evidence from historical accounts and contemporary data. Land Economics 75(3): 341-359.
48. Deaton, A., and J. Muellbauer. 1980. An almost ideal demand system. American Economic Review 70(3): 312-326.
49. Dee, P.S. 1991. Modeling steady state forestry in computable general equilibrium context. Working Paper No. 91/8. Canberra: National Centre for Development Studies.
50. Dervis, K., J. de Melo, and S. Robinson. 1982. General equilibrium models for development policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
51. Devarajan, S. 1988. Natural resources and taxation in computable general equilibrium models of developing countries. Journal of Policy Modeling 10(4): 505-528.
52. Devarajan, S., and D. S. Go. 1998. The simplest dynamic general-equilibrium model of an open economy. Journal of Policy Modeling 20(6): 677-714.
53. Devarajan, S., J. D. Lewis, and S. Robinson. 1994. Getting the model right: The general equilibrium approach to adjustment policy. World Bank and International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, D.C. Photocopy.
54. Dewatripont, M., and G. Michel. 1987. On closure rules, homogeneity, and dynamics in applied general equilibrium models. Journal of Development Economics 26(1): 65-76.
55. Diao, X., E. Yeldan, and T. L. Roe. 1998. A simple dynamic applied general equilibrium model of a small open economy: Transitional dynamics and trade policy. Journal of Economic Development 23(1): 77-101.
56. Dirkse, S. P., and M. C. Ferris. 1995. The PATH solver: A non-monotone stabilization scheme for mixed complementarity problems. Optimization Methods and Software 5: 319-345.
57. Dixon, P. B., and B. R. Parmenter. 1996. Computable general equilibrium modelling for policy analysis and forecasting. In Handbook of computational economics, ed. H. M. Amman, D.A. Kendrick, and J. Rust. Handbooks in Economics 13. Amsterdam: Elsevier/North-Holland.
58. Dixon, P. B., B. R. Parmenter, J. Sutton, and D. P. Vincent. 1982. ORANI: A multisectoral model for the Australian economy. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
59. Dorfman, R., P. A. Samuelson, and R. M. Solow. 1958. Linear programming and economic analysis. New York: McGraw-Hill.
60. Duarte, R. 1979. Migration and urban poverty in Northeast Brazil. Ph.D. diss., University of Chicago, Chicago, III.
61. Ellerman, A. D., H. D. Jacoby, and A. Decaux. 1998. The effects on developing countries of the Kyoto Protocol and carbon dioxide emissions trading. Policy Research Working Paper No.2019. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.
62. Erlich, S., V. Ginsburgh, and L. Van der Heyden. 1987. Where do real wage decreases lead Belgium? European Economic Review 31(7): 1369-1383.
63. ESALQ (Escola Superior de Agricultura "Luiz de Queiroz"). 1998. Sistema de informações de fretes para cargas agrícolas (SIFRECA). Soja (9/97). Piracicaba, Brazil: ESALQ.
64. Evenson, R. E., and A. F. Avila. 1995. Productivity change and technology transfer in the Brazilian grain sector. Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural 34(2): 93-109.
65. Faminow, M. D., and S. A. Vosti. 1998. Livestock-deforestation links: Policy issues in the Western Brazilian Amazon. In Livestock and the environment international conference, ed. A. J. Nell. Wageningen, the Netherlands: World Bank, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, and the International Agricultural Centre.
66. Faminow, M. D., C. Pinho de Sa, and S. J. de Magalhães Oliveira. 1996. Development of an investment model for the smallholder cattle sector in the Western Amazon. International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, D.C. Photocopy.
67. Fearnside, P. 1997. Greenhouse gases from deforestation in Brazilian Amazonia: Net committed emissions. Climatic Change 35 (3): 321-360.
68. Fearnside, P. 1999. Forests and global warming mitigation in Brazil: Opportunities in the Brazilian forest sector for responses to global warming under the "clean development mechanism." Biomass and Bioenergy 16(3): 171-189.
69. Ferris, M. C., and C. Kanzow. 1998. Complementarity and related problems: A survey. Mathematical Programming Technical Report 98-17. University of Wisconsin, Madison. Madison, Wisc.
70. Ferris, M. C., and J. S. Pang. 1997. Engineering and economic applications of complementarity problems. SIAM Revue 39(4): 669-713.
71. FGV (Fundação Getulio Vargas). 1998. Preços de terra (ARIES on-line database: www.fgv.br/cgiwin/aries.exe). Rio de Janeiro.
72. Findlay, R. 1995. Factor proportions, trade, and growth. The Ohlin Lectures No. 5. Cambridge, Mass.: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
73. Flavin, C. 1989. Slowing global warming: A worldwide strategy. Worldwatch Paper 91. Washington, D.C.: Worldwatch Institute.
74. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations). 1999. State of the world's forests. Rome.
75. Gasques, J. C., and J. C. da Conceição. 1998. A demanda de terra para a reforma agrária no Brasil. Paper presented at the workshop on Reforma Agrária e Desenvolvimento Sustentável, 23-25 November, 1998, Fortaleza, Brazil.
76. Gasques, J. C. 2000. Transformações estruturais da agricultura e produtividade total dos fatores. Discussion Paper No. 768. Rio de Janeiro: Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada.
77. Go, D. S. 1995. External shocks, adjustment policies and investment in a developing economy: Illustrations from a forward-looking CGE model of the Philippines. Journal of Development Economics 44(2): 229-261.
78. Golan, A., G. Judge, and D. Miller. 1996. Maximum entropy econometrics: Robust estimation with limited data. New York: Wiley.
79. Golan, A., G. Judge, and S. Robinson. 1994. Recovering information from incomplete or partial multisectoral economic data. Review of Economics and Statistics 76(3): 541-549.
80. Goldin, I., and G. C. Rezende. 1990. Agriculture and economic crisis: Lessons from Brazil. Organisation of Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) Development Centre Studies. Paris: OECD.
81. Goldin, I., O. Knudsen, and D. van der Mensbrugghe. 1993. Trade liberalization: Global economic implications. Paris and Washington, D.C.: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development and the World Bank.
82. Goulder, L., and L. Summers. 1987. Tax policy, asset prices, and growth: A general equilibrium analysis, NBER Working Paper No. 2128. Cambridge, Mass.: National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER).
83. Graham, D. H., and S. Buarque de Holanda. 1971. Migration, regional and urban growth, and development in Brazil. São Paulo: University of São Paulo, Instituto de Pesquisas Econômicas.
84. Harris, J. R., and M. P. Todaro. 1970. Migration, unemployment, and development: A two-sector analysis. American Economic Review 60: 126-142.
85. Hasenkamp, G. 1976. Specification and estimation of multiple-output production functions. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems No. 120. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
86. Hecht, S. B. 1993. The logic of livestock and deforestation in Amazonia. BioScience 43(10): 687-695.
87. Hertel, T. W. 1990. General equilibrium analysis of U.S. agriculture: What does it contribute? Journal of Agricultural Economics Resources 42(3): 3-9.
88. Hertel, T. W. 1997. Global trade analysis: Modeling and applications. New York: Cambridge University Press.
89. Hertel, T. W., and M. E. Tsigas. 1988. Tax policy and U.S. agriculture: A general equilibrium approach. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 70(2): 289-302.
90. Homma, A. K. O., R. T. Walker, F. N. Scatena, A. J. de Conto, R. de Amorim Carvalho, C. A. Palheta Ferreira, and A. Itayguara Moreira dos Santos. 1998. Redução dos desmatamentos na Amazonia: Politica agricola ou ambiental. In Amazonia: Meio ambiente e desenvolvimento agricola, ed. A. K. O. Homma. Brasilia: Embrapa.
91. Horn, H. S. 1975. Markovian processes of forest succession. In Ecology and evolution of communities, ed. M. L. Cody and J. M. Diamond. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press.
92. Hudson, E. A., and D. W. Jorgenson. 1974. U.S. energy policy and economic growth, 1975-2000. Bell Journal of Economics and Management Sciences 5(2): 461-514.
93. IBGE (Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatistica). 1997a. Matriz de insumo-produto Brasil 1995. IBGE. Rio de Janeiro.
94. IBGE (Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatistica). 1997b. Sistema de contas nacionais Brasil 1990-1995/96. IBGE, Rio de Janeiro.
95. IBGE (Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatistica). 1997c. Pesquisa nacional por amostra de domicílios 1996. IBGE, Rio de Janeiro.
96. IBGE (Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatistica). 1997d. Pesquisa de orçamentos familiares 1995/1996. IBGE, Rio de Janeiro.
97. IBGE (Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatistica). 1998a. Censo agropecuário 1995/1996. IBGE, Rio de Janeiro.
98. IBGE (Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatistica). 1998b. Contagem populacional de 1996. IBGE, Rio de Janeiro.
99. IMF (International Monetary Fund). 2000. International Financial Statistics. Washington, D.C.
100. INPE (Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais). 2002. Monitoring the Brazilian Amazon forest by satellite: 2000-2001. São José dos Campos, Brazil.
101. IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). 1996. Climate change 1995: The science of climate change. Contribution of Working Group I to the Second Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, ed. Houghton, et al. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
102. Isard, W., and P. Kaniss. 1973. The 1973 Nobel prize for economic science. Science 182: 568-591.
103. Isard, W., I. J. Azis, M. P. Drennan, R. E. Miller, S. Saltzman, and E. Thorbecke. 1998. Methods of interregional and regional analysis. Ashgate, UK: Aldershot.
104. Johansen, L. 1960. A multisectoral study of economic growth. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
105. Jorgenson, D. W., and P. J. Wilcoxen. 1990. Global change, energy prices, and U.S. economic growth. Harvard Institute of Economic Research Discussion Paper No. 1511. Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass.
106. Kaimowitz, D., and A. Angelsen. 1998. Economic models of tropical deforestation: A review. Bogor, Indonesia: Center for International Forestry Research.
107. Kaimowitz, D., N. Byron, and W. Sunderlin. 1998. Public policies to reduce inappropriate tropical deforestation. In Agriculture and the environment: Perspectives on sustainable rural development, ed. E. Lutz. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.
108. Kaimowitz, D. and J. Smith. 1999. Soybean Technology and the Loss of Natural Vegetation in Brazil and Bolivia. In Technological change in agriculture and tropical deforestation; Agricultural technologies and tropical deforestation, A. Angelsen and D. Kaimowitz, eds. (New York; London; CABI Publishing), pp. 195-212.
109. Karsenty, A. 2000. Economic instruments for tropical forests: The Congo Basin case. London: International Institute for Environment and Development.
110. Keuschnigg, C., and W. Kohler. 1995. Dynamic effects of tariff liberalization: An intertemporal CGE approach. Review of International Economics 3(1): 20-35.
111. Koopmans, T. 1951. Analysis of production as an efficient combination of activities. In Activity analysis of production and distribution. New York: Wiley.
112. Lele, U., V. Viana, A. Verissimo, S. Vosti, K. Perkins, and S. A. Husain. 2000. Brazil - Forests in the balance: Challenges of conservation with development. Evaluation Country Case Study Series. World Bank Operations Evaluation Department. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.
113. Leontief, W. W. 1941. The structure of the American economy 1919-1929. New York: Oxford University Press.
114. Löfgren, H., and S. Robinson. 1999. Spatial networks in multi-region Computable General Equilibrium models. Trade and Macroeconomics Division Discussion Paper No. 35. International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, D.C.
115. Lysy, F. J. 1982. The character of general equilibrium models under alternative closures. World Bank, Washington, D.C. Photocopy.
116. Mahar, D. 1988. Government policies and deforestation in Brazil's Amazon region. Environment Department Working Paper No. 7. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.
117. Manne, A. S. 1985. On the formulation and solution of economic equilibrium models. In Economic equilibrium: Model formulation and solution, ed. A. S. Manne. Mathematical Programming Study No. 23. Amsterdam : North-Holland.
118. Markandya, A. 1997. Economic instruments: Accelerating the move from concepts to practical application. In Finance for sustainable development: The road ahead. Proceedings of the Fourth Group Meeting on Financial Issues of Agenda 21, Santiago, Chile, 1997. New York: United Nations.
119. Martin, R., and S. van Wijnbergen. 1986. Shadow prices and the inter-temporal aspects of remittances and oil revenues in Egypt. In Natural resources and the macroeconomy, ed. J. P. Neary and S. van Wijnbergen. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
120. Martine, G. 1990. Brazil. In International handbook on internal migration, ed. C. B. Nam, W. J. Serow, and D. Sly. New York: Greenwood Press.
121. Mattos, M. M., and C. Uhl. 1994. Economic and ecological perspectives on ranching in the Eastern Amazon. World Development 22(2): 145-158.
122. Mendelsohn, R. 1994. Property rights and tropical deforestation. Oxford Economics Papers 46: 750-756.
123. Mercenier, J., and T. N. Srinivasan, ed. 1994. Applied general equilibrium and economic development: Present achievements and future trends. Ann Arbor, Mich.: The University of Michigan Press.
124. Moura Costa, P., and C. Wilson. 2000. An equivalence factor between CO2 avoided emissions and sequestration-Description and applications in forestry. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 5(1): 51-60.
125. Moura Costa, P., J. Salmi, M. Simula, and C. Wilson. 1999. Financial mechanisms for sustainable forestry. Report prepared for the United Nations Development Program/Forest Program by INDUFOR/ EcoSecurities Limited, London and Helsinki.
126. Mukherjee, N. 1996. Water and land in South Africa: Economy-wide impacts of reform-A case study for the Olifants River. Trade and Macroeconomics Division Discussion Paper, TMD-DP 12. International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, D.C.
127. Nascimento, C.N.B. and A.K.O. Homma. 1984. The Brazilian Enterprise for Agricultural Research, Center for Agroforestry Research of the Eastern Amazon. Belém, Pará, Brazil.
128. Najberg, S., F. Rigolon, and S. Vieira. 1995. Modelo de equilibrio geral computavel como instrumento de politica economica: uma analise de cambio e tarifas. Discussion Paper 30. Rio de Janeiro: Banco Nacional de Desenvolvimento Economico e Social.
129. Nepstad, D. C., A. Verissimo, A. Alencar, C. Nobre, E. Lima, P. Lefebvre, P. Schlesinger, C. Potter, P. Moutinho, E. Mendoza, M. Cochrane, and V. Brooks. 1999. Large-scale impoverishment of Amazonian forests by logging and fire. Nature 398(6726): 505-507.
130. OECD (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development). 1990. Modeling the effects of agricultural policies. OECD Economic Review (Special Issue 13).
131. Pearce, D., B. Day, J. Newcombe, T. Brunello, and T. Bello. 1998. The clean development mechanism: Benefits of the CDM for developing countries. Final draft produced by the Center for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment (CSERGE) for the UK Department for International Development. CSERGE, University College, London.
132. Pereira, A. M. M. 1988. Corporate tax integration in the United States: A dynamic general equilibrium analysis. PhD. diss., Stanford University, Palo Alto, Calif.
133. Pereira, A. M., and J. B. Shoven. 1988. Survey of dynamic applied general equilibrium models for tax policy evaluation. Journal of Policy Modeling 10 (3): 401-436.
134. Perlman, J. 1977. O mito da marginalidade. Rio de Janeiro: Editora Paz e Terra.
135. Persson, A. 1995. A dynamic CGE model of deforestation in Costa Rica. In Biodiversity conservation, ed. C. A. Perrings et al. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
136. Persson, A., and M. Munasinghe. 1995. Natural resource management and economywide policies in Costa Rica: A computable general equilibrium (CGE) modeling approach. The World Bank Economic Review 9(2): 259-285.
137. Perz, S. G. 2000. The rural exodus in the context of economic crisis, globalization, and reform in Brazil. The International Migration Review 34(3): 842-881.
138. Pfaff, A. S. 1997. What drives deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon? Evidence from satellite and socioeconomic data. Policy Research Working Paper No. 1772. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.
139. Pyatt, G. and J. I. Round. 1985. Social accounting matrices: A basis for planning. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.
140. Reis, E., and S. Margulis. 1991. Options for slowing Amazon jungle clearing. In Global warming: Economic policy responses, ed. R. Dornbusch and J. M. Poterba. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
141. Reis, E. P., and S. Schwartzman. 1978. Spatial dislocation and social identity building: Brazil. International Social Sciences Journal 30(1): 98-115.
142. Richards, M. 1999. Internalising the externalities' of tropical forestry: A review of innovative financing and incentive mechanisms. European Union Tropical Forestry Paper No. 1, London: Overseas Development Institute.
143. Richards, M. 2000. Can sustainable tropical forestry be made profitable? The potential and limitations of innovative incentive mechanisms. World Development 28(6): 1001-1016.
144. Robidoux, B., M. Smart, J. Lester, and L. Bearsejour. 1989. The agriculture expanded GET model: Overview of model structure. Canada, Department of Finance, Ottawa, Canada. Photocopy.
145. Robinson, S. 1989. Multisectoral models. In Handbook of Development Economics, ed. H. Chenery and T. N. Srinivasan. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
146. Robinson, S. 1990. Analyzing agricultural trade liberalization with single-country computable general equilibrium models. Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics Working Paper 524. University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, Calif.
147. Robinson, S. 1991. Macroeconomics, financial variables, and computable general equilibrium models. World Development 19(11): 1509-1525.
148. Robinson, S, S. Hoffmann, and S. Subramanian. 1994. Defense spending reductions and the California economy: A computable general equilibrium model. Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics Working Paper 688. University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, Calif.
149. Robinson, S., M. Kilkenny, and K. Hanson. 1990. The USDA/ERS computable general equilibrium (CGE) model of the United States. ERS Staff Report No. AGES-9049, Agricultural and Rural Economy Division, Economic Research Service. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Agriculture.
150. Sahota G. 1968. An economic analysis of internal migration in Brazil. Journal of Political Economy 76(2): 218-245.
151. Samuelson, P. 1949. Market mechanisms and maximization. Rand Paper Series P-69. Santa Monica, Calif.: Rand Corporation.
152. Schneider, R. 1992. Brazil: An analysis of environmental problems in the Amazon. Report No. 9104 BR, Vol. I. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.
153. Schneider, R. 1994. Government and the economy on the Amazon frontier. Latin America and the Caribbean Technical Department, Regional Studies Program Report 34. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.
154. Scholz, C. M. 1998. Involuntary unemployment and environmental policy: The double dividend hypothesis: A comment. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics 100(3): 663-664.
155. SENAR/FGV (Serviço Nacional de Aprendizagem Rural/Fundação Getúlio Vargas) 1998. O perfil da agricultura Brasileira. Brasília.
156. Seroa de Motta, R. 1997. The economics of biodiversity in Brazil: The case of forest conservation. In Investing in biological diversity: The Cairns conference. Proceedings of the OECD International Conference on Incentive Measures for the Conservation and Sustainable Use of Biological Diversity, held in Cairns, Australia, 25-28 March, 1996. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
157. Serrão, E. A. S., and A. K. O. Homma. 1993. Country profiles: Brazil. In Sustainable agriculture and the environment in the humid tropics. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press for the National Research Council.
158. Shoven, J. B., and J. Whalley. 1984. Applied general-equilibrium models of taxation and international trade. Journal of Economic Literature 22(3): 1007-1051.
159. Shoven, J. B. 1992. Applying general equilibrium. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
160. Shugart, H. H., T. R. Crow, and J. M. Hett. 1973. Forest succession models: A rationale and methodology for modeling forest succession over large regions. Forest Science 19: 203-212.
161. Simpson, R. D., R. A. Sedjo, J. W. Reid. 1996. Valuing biodiversity for use in pharmaceutical research. Journal of Political Economy 104(1): 163-185.
162. Southgate, D. 1998. Tropical forest conservation: An economic assessment of the alternatives in Latin America. New York: Oxford University Press.
163. Srinivasan, T. N. 1982. General equilibrium theory, project evaluation, and economic development. In The theory and experience of economic development: Essay in honor of Sir W. Arthur Lewis, ed. M. Gersowvitz et al. London: George Allen and Unwin.
164. Stone, S. W. 1998. Evolution of the timber industry along an aging frontier: The case of Paragominas (1990-95). World Development 26(3): 433-448.
165. Summers, L. 1985. Taxation and the size and composition of the capital stock: An asset price approach. Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass. Photocopy.
166. Terkla, D. 1984. The efficiency value of effluent tax revenues. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 11(2): 107-123.
167. Thiele, R. 1994. How to manage tropical forests more sustainably: The case of Indonesia. Intereconomics 29 (July/August): 184-193.
168. Thiele, R., and M. Wiebelt. 1992. Modeling deforestation in a computable general equilibrium model. Kieler Arbeitspapiere No. 555. Kiel, Germany: Kiel Institute of World Economics.
169. Toniolo, A., and C. Uhl. 1995. Economic and ecological perspectives on agriculture in the eastern Amazon. World Development 23(6): 959-973.
170. Valentim, J. F., and S. A. Vosti. Forthcoming. ASB research in the western Brazilian Amazon: Issues, activities, and impacts. Alternatives to Slash-and-Burn Programme. Nairobi: International Centre for Research in Agroforestry (ICRAF).
171. Verissimo, A., P. Barreto, M. Mattos, R. Tarifa, and C. Uhl. 1992. Logging impacts and prospects for sustainable forest management in an old Amazonian frontier: The case of Paragominas. Forest Ecology and Management 55: 169-199.
172. Vosti, S. A., C. L. Carpentier, and J. Witcover. 2002. Agricultural intensification by smallholders in the western Brazilian Amazon: From deforestation to sustainable land use. Research Report 130. Washington, D.C.: International Food Policy Research Institute.
173. Vosti, S. A., C. L. Carpentier, J. Witcover, and J. F. Valentim. 2001. Intensified small-scale livestock systems in the western Brazilian Amazon. In Agricultural technologies and tropical deforestation, ed. A. Angelsen and D. Kaimowitz. Wallingford, U.K.: CAB International.
174. Watson, R. T. 2000. Land use, land-use change, and forestry: A special report of the IPCC. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
175. Weinhold, D. 1999. Estimating the los of agricultural productivity in the Amazon. Ecological Economics 31: 63-76.
176. White, D., F. Holmann, S. Fujisaka, K. Reategui, and C. Lascano. 2001. Will intensifying pasture management in Latin America protect forests-or is it the other way round? In Agriculutral technologies and tropical deforestation. A. Angelsen and D. Kaimowitz, eds. Wallingford, U.K.: CAB International.
177. Wiebelt, M. 1994. Protecting Brazil's tropical forests: A CGE analysis of macroeconomic, sectoral and regional policies. Kieler Arbeitspapiere No. 638. Kiel, Germany: Kiel Institute of World Economics.
178. Wood, C.H. and R. Porro, eds. 2002. Land use and deforestation in the Amazon. Gainesville, Florida: University Press of Florida.
179. Xie, J., J. R. Vincent, and T. Panayotou. 1996. Computable general equilibrium models and the analysis of policy spillover in the forest sector. Environment Discussion Paper No. 19. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Institute for International Development.