Ultrasound screening in pregnancy: Evidence and maternity care reality;Ultraschall-screening in der schwangerschaft: Evidenz und versorgungswirklichkeit

Zeitschrift fur Arztliche Fortbildung und Qualitatssicherung

Volumn 96, Issue 10, 2002, Pages 649-654

  Jahn, Albrecht ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

Evidence based medicine; Germany; Maternity care; Screening; Ultrasound

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; COCHRANE LIBRARY; DIAGNOSTIC ERROR; ECHOGRAPHY; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; FETUS MALFORMATION; GERMANY; GESTATIONAL AGE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; INDUCED ABORTION; INFORMED CONSENT; INTRAUTERINE GROWTH RETARDATION; LABOR INDUCTION; MATERNAL CARE; MULTIPLE PREGNANCY; PATIENT COUNSELING; PLACENTA PREVIA; POSTMATURITY; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY COMPLICATION; PRENATAL SCREENING;

EID: 0036970352     PISSN: 14317621     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Berglund AC, Lindmark GC (1998) Health services effects of a reduced routine programme for antenatal care. An area-based study, European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 77: 193-199
2. Bernaschek G, Stuempflen I, Deutinger J (1996) The influence of the experience of the investigator on the rate of sonographic diagnosis of fetal malformations in Vienna, Prenat. Diagn. 16: 807-811
3. Bricker L, Garcia J, Henderson J, Mugford M, Neilson J, Roberts T, Martin MA (2000) Ultrasound screening in pregnancy: a systematic review of the clinical effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and women's views Health Technol. Assess. 4: 1-193
4. Bricker L, Neilson JP: Routine ultrasound in late pregnancy (after 24 weeks gestation) (Cochrane Review). [Issue 1, 2002]. 2002. Oxford, Update Software. The Cochrane Library
5. Bryant LD, Green JM, Hewison J (2001) Prenatal screening for Down's syndrome: some psychosocial implications of a 'screening for all' policy, Public Health 115: 356-358
6. Bundesauschuss der Ärzte und Krankenkassen (1999) Richtlinien des Bundesausschusses der Ärzte und Krankenkassen über die ärztliche Betreuung während der Schwangerschaft und nach der Entbindung (Mutterschaftsrichtlinien), Bundesanzeiger no. 16
7. Cadman D, Chambers L, Feldman W, Sackett D (1984) Assessing the effectiveness of community screening programs, JAMA 251: 1580-1585
8. Dewald A, Cierpka M (2001) Psychosoziale Beratung im Zusammenhang mit Pränataldiagnostik, Gynäkologe 34: 565-567
9. Enkin M, Keirse MJN, Neilson JP et al. (2000) A Guide to Effective Care in Pregnancy & Childbirth, 3 edn, Oxford University Press, New York
10. Faber R, Stepan H, Schilde M et al. (2001) Accuracy of prenatal diagnoses in terminated pregnancies - a retrospective analysis of results and influences, Zeitschrift für Geburtshilfe und Neonatologie 205: 54-59
11. Hansmann M, Hackelöer BJ, Staudach A (1985) Diagnose der Wachstumsretardierung In:Ultraschalldiagnostik in Geburtshitfe und Gynäkologie, Springer-Verlag, Berlin
12. Holzgreve W (2002) Ultrasonic examinations in pregnancy - a tool as good as the user, Ultraschall in der Medizin 23: 9-10
13. Honnefelder L (2000) Screening in der Schwangerschaft: Ethische Aspekte, Deutsches Ärzteblatt 97: A-529-531
14. Jahn A, Funck G, Razum O (1999) Ultraschall-Screening in der Schwangerschaft - Fraglicher Nutzen des Ultraschall-Screenings zur Erkennung einer intrauterinen Wachstumsretardierung im klinischen Alltag, Fortschritte der Medizin 117: 35-37
15. Jahn A, Razum O (2001) Observational studies for intervention assessment, The Lancet 357: 2141
16. Jahn A, Razum O, Berle P (1998) Routine screening for intrauterine growth retardation in Germany: low sensitivity and questionable benefit for diagnosed cases, Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 77:643-648
17. Jahn A, Razum O, Berle P (1999) Routine-Ultraschall in der deutschen Schwangerenvorsorge: Ist die Effektivität gesichert?, Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde 59: 97-102
18. Karsa v L (1995) Mammographie Screening. Umfassendes, populationsbezogenens Qualitätsmanagement ist hier gefragt!, Zeitschrift für Allgemeinmedizin 71: 1863-1867
19. Kennard A, Donnenfeld A, Leck, I (2000) Ultrasound scanning for congenital abnormalities In: Antenatal and neonatal screening, second edn, N. Wald & I. Leck, eds., Oxford University Press, Oxford
20. Kmietowicz Z (2000) Warn the public of screening limitations, staff told, British Medical Journal 321: 914
21. Levine AB, Lockwood CJ (2000) Ultrasound as an ancillary investigation in the management of pregnancy In: Antenatal and neonatal screening, second edn, N. Wald & I. Leck, eds., Oxford University Press, Oxford
22. Luck CA (1992) Value of routine ultrasound scanning at 19 weeks: a four year study of 8849 deliveries, British Medical Journal 304: 1474-1478
23. Moore WMO (1999) All parents should be given leaflet outlining full details of antenatal screening. British Medical Journal 319: 259
24. Neilson JP (2002) Ultrasound for fetal assessment in early pregnancy [Issue 1, 2002]. 2002. Oxford, Update Software. The Cochrane Library
25. Queisser-Luft A, Stopfkuchen H, Stolz G et al. (1998) Prenatal diagnosis of major malformations: quality control of routine ultrasound examinations based on a five-year study of 20248 newborn fetuses and infants, Prenat. Diagn. 18: 567-576
26. Saari-Kemppainen A, Karjalainen O, Ylöstalo P, Heinonen OP (1990) Ultrasound screening and perinatal mortality: controlled trial of systematic one-stage screening in pregnancy, The Lancet 336: 387-391
27. Salvesen KA, Oyen L, Schmidt N, Malt UF, Eik-Nes SH (1997) Comparison of long-term psychological responses of women after pregnancy termination due to fetal anomalies and after perinatal loss, Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology 9: 80-85
28. Steward-Brown S, Farmer A (1997) Screening could seriously damage your health, British Medical Journal 314:533-534
29. Tennstedt C, Chaoui R, Bollmann R et al. (1998) Correlation of prenatal ultrasound diagnosis and morphological findings of fetal autopsy, Pathol. Res. Pract. 194: 721-724
30. Wilson JMG, Jungner G (1968) Principles and practice of screening for disease World Health Organization, Geneva