Fraudulent use of radiographic images

Journal of Forensic Odonto-Stomatology

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 25-30

  Boscolo F N ^a,d   Almeida, S M ^a   Neto, F Haiter ^a   Oliveira, A E F ^b   Tuji, F M ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMPINAS   (Brazil)

^b University of Maranhao   (Brazil)

^c University of Para   (Brazil)

^d Faculdade Odontol Piracicaba U   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Dental radiography; Forensic dentistry; Radiographic image enhancement

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DENTAL RADIOLOGY; ERROR; FORENSIC IDENTIFICATION; FORGERY; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE DISPLAY; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE QUALITY; ODONTOLOGY; PANORAMIC RADIOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TOMOGRAPHY; TOOTH IMPLANTATION;

EID: 0036969106     PISSN: 0258414X     EISSN: 22196749     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Wenzel A. Developments in radiographic caries diagnosis. J Dent 1993;21:131-40.
2. Wenzel A. Computer-aided image manipulation of intraoral radiographs to enhance diagnosis in dental practice: a review. Int Dent J 1993;43:99-108.
3. Dunn SM, Kantor ML. Digital radiology - facts and fictions. J Am Dent Assoc 1993;124:39-46.
4. Jones GA, Behrents RG, Bailey GP. Legal considerations for digitized images. Gen Dent 1996;44:242-4.
5. Tsang A, Sweet D, Wood RE. Potential for fraudulent use of digital radiography. J Am Dent Assoc, 1999;130:1325-9.
6. Homer K, Brettle DS, Rushton VE. The potential medico-legal implications of computed radiography. Br Dent J 1996;180:271-3.
7. Bruder GA, Casale J, Goren A, Friedman S. Alteration of computer dental radiography images. J Endod 1999;25:275-6.
8. Visser H, Krüger W. Can dentists recognize manipulated digital radiographs? Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1996;26:67-9.