Beyond the genome: Reconstituting the new genetics

New Genetics and Society

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 267-277

  Glasner, Peter ^a  

^a CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOTECHNOLOGY; GENE MAPPING; GENE SEQUENCE; GENETICS; GENOMICS; HUMAN; HUMAN GENOME; MEDICAL GENETICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOCIOLOGY;

EID: 0036967167     PISSN: 14636778     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14636770216009     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Balmer, B. (1993) Mutations in the research system? The Human Genome Project and science policy, unpublished D.Phil thesis, University of Sussex.
2. Balmer,B.(1996) The political cartography of the Human Genome Project, Perspectives on Science 4 (3), pp. 98-132.
3. Beck, U. (1992) Risk Society (London: Sage).
4. Bijker, W.E. (1995) Sociohistorical technology studies. In Jasanoff, S. et al. (eds) Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, pp. 229-56 (London: Sage).
5. Bijker, W.E. & Law, J. (eds) (1992) Shaping Technology/Building Society. Studies in Socio-technical Change (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
6. Bijker, W.E., Hughes, T.P. & Pinch, T.J. (eds) (1987) The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
7. Clarke, A.E. & Fujimura, J.H. (1992) What tools? Which jobs? Why right? In Clarke, A.E. & Fujimura, J.H. (eds) The Right Tools for the Job. At Work in Twentieth-century Life Sciences, pp. 3-44 (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).
8. Collier, D.A. (2001) Sudden impact? The human genome sequence and the pace of gene discovery in complex diseases, Pharmacogenomics Journal, 1, pp. 9-11.
9. Corthals, G.L. & Nelson, P.S. (2001) Large-scale proteomics and its future impact on medicine, The Pharmacogenomics Journal, 1, pp. 15-22.
10. Department of Health (2001) Development of Genetics Knowledge Parks. Tender Specification Document (www.doh.gov.uk/research/announcements/genetics.htm).
11. Eisenberg, D., Marcotte, E.M., Xenarios, I. & Yeates, T.O. (2000) Protein function in the post-genomic era, Nature, 405, 15 June, pp 823-6.
12. Ellul, J. (1964) The Technological Society (New York: Alfred Knopf).
13. Elzinga, A. & Jamison, A. (1995) Changing policy agendas in science and technology. In Jasanoff, S. et al. (eds) Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, pp. 572-97 (London: Sage).
14. Fields, S. (2001) Proteomics in genomeland, Science, 291, 16 February, pp. 1221-4.
15. Fujimura, J. (1987) Constructing 'do-able' problems in cancer research: articulating alignment, Social Studies of Science, 17, pp. 257-93.
16. Gaskell, G. et al. (2000) Biotechnology and the European public, Nature Biotechnology 18, pp. 935-8.
17. Gibbons, M. (1999) Science's new social contract with society, Nature, 402, Supplement 2, pp. C81-4.
18. Gieryn, T.F. (1995) Boundaries of science. In Jasanoff, S. et al. (eds) Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, pp. 393-443 (London: Sage).
19. Glasner, P. (1996) From community to 'collaboratory'? The human genome mapping project and the changing culture of science, Science and Public Policy, 23 (2), pp. 109-16.
20. Glasner, P. & Rothman, H. (1999) Does familiarity breed concern? Bench scientists and the Human Genome Mapping Project, Science and Public Policy, 26, pp. 313-24.
21. Grove-White, R., Macnaughten, P., Mayer, S. & Wynne, B. (1997) Uncertain World. Genetically Modified Organisms, Food and Public Attitudes in Britain (Lancaster: Lancaster University).
22. Hampel, J. & Renn, O. (eds) (2000) Special issue: German attitudes to genetic engineering, New Genetics and Society, 19 (3), pp. 221-388.
23. Huang, S. (2000) The practical problems of post-genomic biology, Nature Biotechnology, 18, pp. 471-2.
24. Irwin, A. (1995) Citizen Science. A Study of People, Expertise and Sustainable Development (London: Routledge).
25. Keating, P., Limoges, C. & Cambrosio, A. (1999) The automated laboratory. The generation and replication of work in molecular genetics. In Fortun, M. & Mendelsohn, E. (eds) The Practices of Human Genetics, pp. 125-42 (Dordrecht: Kluwer).
26. Latour, B. (1987) Science in Action. How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society (Milton Keynes: Open University Press).
27. Lewontin, R (2001) They got the wrong key of life, Sunday Times (News Review), 8 July, p. 4.
28. Lockhart, D.J. & Winzeler, E.A. (2000) Genomics, gene expression and DNA arrays, Nature, 405, 15 June, 827-36.
29. MacKenzie, D. & Wajcman, J. (eds) (1985) The Social Shaping of Technology. A Reader (Milton Keynes: Open University Press).
30. Martin, P. (2001) Genetic governance: the risks, oversight and regulation of genetic databases in the UK, New Genetics and Society, 20 (2), pp. 157-83.
31. McFadden, J. (2001) The proteomic project will unlock the secrets of life, Guardian, 6 June, p. 22.
32. Meek, J. (2001) $500m human map to trump DNA project, Guardian, 6 April, p. 6.
33. Nature (2001) International human genome sequencing consortium 'initial sequencing of the human genome', 409, 15 February, pp. 860-921.
34. Nature Insight (2000) Insight: functional genomics, Nature, 405, 15 June, pp. 819-65.
35. Nelkin, D. & Lindee, S. (1995) The DNA Mystique: The Gene as a Cultural Icon (New York: Freeman).
36. Nowotny, H., Scott, P. & Gibbons, M. (2001) Rethinking Science. Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty (Cambridge: Polity Press).
37. Orr, T. (2000) Paris creates its version of a genomic valley, Genetic Engineering News, 20 (2), p. 28.
38. Paabo, S. (2001) The human genome and our view of ourselves, Science, 291, 16 February, pp. 1219-20.
39. Patel, K. (1999) Whitehall split over Hinxton bid, Times Higher Education Supplement, 17 September, p. 7.
40. Peltonen, L. (2001) The molecular dissection of human diseases after the human genome, Pharmacogenomics Journal, 1, pp. 5-14.
41. Peltonen, L. & McKusick, V.A. (2001) Dissecting human disease in the postgenomic era, Science, 291, 16 February, pp. 1224-9.
42. Pinch, T. & Bijker, W.E. (1987) The social construction of facts and artefacts: Or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other. In Bijker, W.E., Hughes, T.P. & Pinch, T.J. (eds) The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology, pp. 17-50 (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
43. Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology (2001) Open channels. Public dialogue in science and technology, Report 153, Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology, London.
44. Price, D. de Solla (1963) Little Science, Big Science (New York: Columbia University Press).
45. Rifkin, J. (1988) The Biotech Century: How Genetic Commerce Will Change the World (London: Phoenix).
46. Roos, D.S. (2001) Bioinformatics - trying to swim in a sea of data, Science, 291, 16 February, pp. 1260-1.
47. Rothman, B.K. (1995) Of maps and imaginations: sociology confronts the genome, Social Problems, 42 (1), pp. 1-10.
48. Rothman, H. (1994) Between science and industry: the Human Genome Project and instrumentalities, Genetic Engineer and Biotechnologist, 14 (2), pp. 81-91.
49. Rothman, H. (1998) Gene sequencer. In Bud, R. & Warner, D.J. (eds) Instruments of Science: An Historical Encyclopaedia, pp. 281-3 (London: Science Museum & National Museum of American History, Smithsonian Institution, in association with Garland).
50. Royal Society (1985) The Public Understanding of Science (London: Royal Society).
51. Star, L.J. & Griesemer, P. (1989) Institutional ecology, 'translations' and boundary objects: amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology 1907-1939, Social Studies of Science, 19, pp. 387-420.
52. Stemerding, D. (1995) The entrenchment of human genome technology in society: on shifting boundaries between private and public discourses. In Schomberg, R. von (ed.) Contested Technology. Ethics, Risk and Public Debate, pp. 143-54 (Tilburg: International Centre for Human and Public Affairs).
53. Strauss, A.L., Fagerhaugh, S., Suczek, B. & Weiner, C. (1985) The Social Organisation of Medical Work (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press).
54. Venter, C. et al. (2001) The sequence of the human genome, Science, 291, 16 February, pp. 1304-51.
55. Vucmirovic, O.G. & Tighman, S.M. (2000) Exploring genome space, Nature, 405, 15 June, pp. 820-2.
56. Wynne, B. (1995) Public understanding of science. In Jasanoff, S. et al. (eds) Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, pp. 361-88 (London: Sage).
57. Wynne, B. (1996) May the sheep safely graze? In Lash, S., Szerszynski, B. & Wynne, B. (eds) Risk, Environment and Modernity. Towards a New Ecology, pp. 44-83 (London: Sage).
58. Yoxen, E. (1986) The Gene Business (London: Free Association Books).
59. Ziman, J. (1984) An Introduction to Science Studies (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
60. Zimmern, R. (1998) Genetic medicine, common diseases and public health. In New Paradigm: New Policies. Healthcare and the New Genetics in Britain and Germany, p. 4 (London: Genetics Interest Group).
61. Zweiger, G. (2001) Transducing the Genome: Information, Anarchy and Revolution in the Biomedical Sciences (New York: McGraw Hill).