Advances in biomedical informatics for the management of cancer

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

Volumn 980, Issue , 2002, Pages 287-297

  Haque, Syed ^a   Mital, Dinesh ^a   Srinivasan, Shankar ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MEDICINE AND DENTISTRY OF NEW JERSEY   (United States)

Author keywords

Artificial intelligence; Biomedical informatics; Cancer management; Computer networking; Computer aided diagnosis; Decision support systems; Image processing

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING; BIOMEDICINE; BIOSTATISTICS; CANCER THERAPY; CONFERENCE PAPER; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; EDUCATION; GENE EXPRESSION; HEALTH CARE ACCESS; IMAGE PROCESSING; LIFE EXPECTANCY; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; MEDICAL INFORMATION;

EID: 0036965725     PISSN: 00778923     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2002.tb04905.x     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (54)

1. SIKORA, K. 1999. Developing a global strategy for cancer. Eur. J. Cancer 35: 1870-1877.
2. GREENLEE, R.T., et al. 2000. Cancer statistics. 2000. CA Cancer J. Clin. 50: 7-33.
3. PISANO, E.D. & C.A. PARHAM. 2000. Digital mammography, sestamibi breast scintigraphy, and positron emission tomography breast imaging. Radiol. Clin. North Am. 38: 861-869.
4. JIANG, Y., et al. 1999. Improving breast cancer diagnosis with computer aided design. Acad. Rad. 6: 22-23.
5. SAHINER, B., et al. 2000. Feature selection and classifier performance in computer aided diagnosis: the effect of finite sample size. Med. Phys. 27: 1509-1522.
6. FEIG, S.A. & R.E. HENDRICK. 1993. Risk, Benefit and Controversies in Mammographic Screening. 119-135. Radiological Society of North America, Inc., Oak Brooks, IL.
7. DUFFY, S.W. & L. TABAR. 2000. Screening mammography reevaluated. Lancet 355: 747-748.
8. SMART, C.R., et al. 1995. Benefit of mammography screening in women ages 40-49 years. Cancer 75: 1619-1626.
9. ADLER, D. & M.A. HELVIE. 1992. Mammographic biopsy recommendations. Curr. Op. Radiol. 4: 123-129.
10. KOPANS, D.B. 1991. The positive predictive value of mammography. AJR. 158: 521-526.
11. BOCCIGNONE, G., A. CHIANESE & A. PICARIELLO. 2000. Computer aided detection of microcalcifications in digital mammograms. Comput. Biol. Med. 30: 267-286.
12. MATA, C.R., et al. 2000. Detection of microcalcifications by means of multiscale methods and statistical techniques. J. Digit. Imaging 13: 221-225.
13. DOBRO, S.W., et al. 2000. Nuclear morphometry for the prediction of regional lymph nodes metastases in patients with cancer of the larynx. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 123: 770-774.
14. KEGELMEYER, W.P., et al. 1994. Computer aided mammographic screening for spiculated lesions. Radiolology 191: 331-337.
15. HUO, Z., et al. 2000. Computerized analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns for breast cancer risk assessment: feature selection. Med. Phys. 27: 4-12.
16. LONGATTO, F.A., A. SANTINELLI & R. MONTIRONI. 2000. Chromatin texture by computer-assisted image analysis. Pathologica 92: 94-95.
17. BERTHE, J.V., et al. 2001. The contribution of of image cytometry to the characterization of clinical subgroups lipomas. Intl. J. Oncol. 18: 1315-1321.
18. ZENG, J., et al. 2001. Prostate biopsy protocols: 3D visualization-based evaluation and clinical correlation. Comput. Aided Surg. 6: 14-21.
19. NAKAJIMA, Y., et al. 2000. Enhanced video image guidance for biopsy using the safety map. Stud. Health Technol. Informat. 70: 230-232.
20. CHAN, H.P., et al. 1999. Improvement of radiologists' characterization of mammographic masses by computer aided diagnosis: an ROC study. Radiology 212: 817-827.
21. SANDERS, G.D., R.F. NEASE, JR. & D.K. OWENS. 2000. Design and pilot evaluation of a system to develop computer-based site-specific practice guidelines from decision models. Med. Decision Making 20: 145-159.
22. WARREN, B.L., et al. 2000. Potential contribution of computer-aided detection to the sensitivity of screening mammography. Radiology 215: 554-562.
23. MOBERG, K., et al. 2001. Computed assisted detection of interval breast cancers. Eur. J. Radiol. 39: 104-110.
24. BIRDWELL, R.L., et al. 2001. Mammographic characteristics of 115 missed cancers later detected with screening mammography and the potential utility of computer-aided detection. Radiology 219: 192-202.
25. VYBORNY, C.J., M.L. GIGER & R.M. NISHIKAWA. 2000. Computer-aided detection and diagnosis of breast cancer. Radiol. Clin. North Am. 38: 725-740.
26. MICHAELSON, J.S., E. HALPERN & D.B. KOPANS. 1999. Breast cancer: computer simulation method for estimating optimal intervals for screening. Radiology 212: 551-560.
27. ZWIGGELAAR, R., et al. 1999. Model-based detection of spiculated lesions in mammograms. Med. Image Analysis 3: 39-62.
28. BREITFELD, P.P., et al. 1999. Pilot study of a point-of-use decision support tool for cancer clinical trials eligibility. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 6: 466-477.
29. FLOYD, C.E., JR., J.Y. LO & G.D. TOURASSI. 2000. Case-based reasoning computer algorithm that uses mammographic findings for breast biopsy decisions. Am. J. Roentgenol. 175: 1347-1352.
30. SCHNORRENBERG, F., et al. 1997. Computer-aided detection of breast cancer nuclei. IEEE Trans. Inform. Technol. Biomed. 1: 128-140.
31. ZHANG, B., et al. 1999. Feature selection for computerized mass detection in digitized mammograms by using genetic algorithms. Acad. Rad. 6: 327-332.
32. YAMANY, S.M., K.J. KHIANI & A.A. FAROOQ. 1997. Application of neural networks and genetic algorithms in the classification of endothelial cells. Patt. Recog. 18: 1205-1210.
33. ANASTASIO, M.A., et al. 1998. A genetic algorithm based method for optimizing the performance of a computer based diagnosis scheme for detection of clustered microcalcifications in mammograms. Med. Physics. 25: 1613-1620.
34. DAYHOFF, J.E. & J.M. DELEO. 2001. Artificial neural networks: opening the black box. Cancer 91: 1615-1635.
35. VAN OSDOL, W.W., T.G. MYERS & J.N. WEINSTEIN. 2000. Neural network techniques for informatics of cancer drug. Meth. Enzymol. 321: 369-395.
36. YU, S. & L. GUAN. 2000. A CAD system for the automatic detection of clustered microcalcifications in digitized mammogram films. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 19: 115-126.
37. GAVRIELIDES, M.A., et al. 2000. Segmentation of suspicious clustered microcalcifications in mammograms. Med. Phys. 27: 13-22.
38. PENEDO, M.G., et al. 1998. Computer-aided diagnosis: a neural-network-based approach to lung nodule detection. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 17: 872-880.
39. WU, Y., et al. 1993. Artificial neural networks im Mammography application to decision making diagnosis of breast cancer. Radiol. 187: 81-87.
40. WILDING, P., et al. 1994. Application of back propagation neural networks to the diagnosis of breast and ovarian cancer. Cancer Lett. 77: 159-193.
41. LO, J.Y., et al. 1995. Computer-aided diagnosis of breast cancer: artificial neural network approach for optimized merging of mammographic features. Acad. Radiol. 2: 841-850.
42. LO, J.Y., et al. 1997. Predicting breast cancer invasion with artificial neural networks on the basis of mammographic features. Radiology 189: 555-558.
43. ROWBOTTOM, C.G., S. WEBB & M. OLDHAM. 1999. Beam-orientation customization using an artificial neural network. Phys. Med. Biol. 44: 2251-2262.
44. LONDON, J.W. & L.G. GOMELLA. 2000. Overview of the Internet and prostate cancer resources. Sem. Urol. Oncol. 18: 245-253.
45. PAUTLER, S.E., et al. 2001. Use of the internet for self-education by patients with prostate cancer. Urology 57: 230-233.
46. KIM, H.S., E. KIM & J.W. KIM. 2001. Development of a breast self-examination program for the Internet: health information for Korean women. Cancer Nurs. J. 24: 156-161.
47. HOLZER, S., et al. 1999. Data warehousing as a tool for quality management in oncology. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 68: 432-435.
48. LIU, J.M., et al. 2000. Integration of computer-assembled digital images and text data as evidence for the oncological record. J. Digit. Imaging 13: 55-59.
49. BARTHELEMY-BRICHANT, N., et al. 1999. Evaluation of frequency and type of errors detected by a computerized record and verify system during radiation treatment. Radiother. Oncol. 53: 149-154.
50. RICKE, J. & H. BARTELINK. 2000. Telemedicine and its impact on cancer management. Eur. J. Cancer 36: 826-833.
51. LOWE, H.J. 1999. Transforming the cancer center in the 21st century. MD Comp. 16: 40-42.
52. PAPPALARDO, P.A., et al. 1998. Microdissection, microchip arrays, and molecular analysis of tumor cells. Sem. Rad. Oncol. 8: 217-223.
53. WILKINSON, D.S. 1997. The role of technology in the clinical laboratory of the future. Review 11: 322-330.
54. PERERA, F.P. & I.B. WEINSTEIN. 2000. Molecular epidemiology: recent advances and future directions. Carcinogenesis 21: 517-524.