New mutations affecting meristem growth and potential in Petunia hybrida vilm

Journal of Heredity

Volumn 87, Issue 5, 1996, Pages 371-377

  Napoli, C A ^a   Ruehle, J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; GENE LOCUS; GENETIC REGULATION; MUTATION; NONHUMAN; PLANT GROWTH; PLEIOTROPY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECESSIVE INHERITANCE;

PETUNIA; PETUNIA HYBRIDA; PETUNIA X HYBRIDA;

EID: 0029858754     PISSN: 00221503     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a023016     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Alvarez J, Guli CL, Yu X-H, and Smyth DR, 1992. Terminal flower, a gene affecting inflorescence development in Arabidopsis. Plant J 2-103-116.
2. Bell AD, 1991. An illustrated guide to flowering plant morphology New York: Oxford University Press.
3. Child A, 1979. A review of branching patterns in the Solanaceae. In: The biology and taxonomy of the Solanaceae (Hawkes JG, Lester RN, and Skelding AD, eds). London, Academic Press, 345-356.
4. Clayberg CD, Butler L, Kerr EA, Rick CM, and Robinson RW. 1966. Third list of known genes in the tomato. J Hered 46:22-26.
5. Coen ES, 1991. The role of homeotic genes in flower development and evolution. Annu Rev Plant Physiol 42: 241-279.
6. Coen ES, Romero JM, Doyle S, Elliot R, Murphy G, and Carpenter R, 1990. Floricaula. a homeotic gene required for flower development in Antirrhinum majus. Cell 63: 1311-1322.
7. Cornu A and Bugnon F, 1971. Un example de ramification résolutive chez les phanérogames: formation de l'inflorescence scorpioide chez le Petunia hybrida hort Soc Bot Fr Mémoires 87-98.
8. Gifford EM and Foster AS, 1989. Morphology and evolution of vascular plants New York: W. H. Freeman.
9. Harberd N, Peng J, and Carol P, 1994 Genetic and molecular analysis of plant shape and form using Arabidopsis thaliana as a model system. In: Shape and form in plants and fungi (Ingram DS and Hudson A, eds). London: Academic Press; 241-249.
10. Huijser P, Klein J, Lönnig W, Jeijer H, Saedler H, and Sommer H, 1992. Bracteomania, an inflorescence anomaly, is caused by the loss of function of the MADS-box gene squamosa in Antirrhinum majus. EMBO J 11:1239-1249.
11. Lincoln C, Britton JH, and Estelle M, 1990. Growth and development of the axrl mutant of Arabidopsis Plant Cell 2:1071-1080.
12. MacArthur JW, 1932, Inherited characters in tomato. I. The self-pruning habit. J Hered 23:395-396.
13. Napoli C, 1996. Highly branched phenotype of the Petunia hybrida dadl-1 mutant is reversed by grafting. Plant Physiol 111:27-37.
14. Napoli C and Klee H, 1993. Phenotype modification in horticulture crops through hormonal control. Scient Hort 55:161-175.
15. Prior P, 1957. Alterations m the shoot apex on Petunia hybrida Vilm. at flowering. Iowa Acad Sci 64:104-109.
16. Reid JB and Ross JJ. 1993. A mutant-based approach, using Pisum sativum, to understanding plant growth. Int J Plant Sci 154:22-34.
17. Schultz EA and Haughn G, 1991. LEAFY, a homeotic gene that regulates inflorescence development in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 3.771-781.
18. Shannon S and Meeks-Wagner DR, 1991. A mutation in the Arabidopsis TFL1 gene affects inflorescence meristem development. Plant Cell 3:877-892.
19. Sheridan WF, 1988. Maize developmental genetics: genes of morphogenesis. Annu Rev Genet 22.353-385.
20. Silvy A, 1974. Etude des modes de ramification sympodiale chez Lycopersicum esculentum et L pimpinellifolium. Can J Bot 52.2207-2218.
21. Singer SR, Hsiung LP, and Huber SC, 1990 Determinate (det) mutant of Pisum sativum (Leguminosae:Papilionoideae) exhibits an indeterminate growth pattern. Am J Bot 77:1330-1335.
22. Singleton WR, 1946. Inheritance of indeterminate growth in maize. J Hered 37:61-64.
23. Sleeves TA and Sussex IM, 1989. Patterns in plant development. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press
24. Weberling F 1989. Morphology of flowers and inflorescences. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press