A statewide profile of early intervention services using the Part C data system

Journal of Early Intervention

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 15-26

  Buysse, Virginia ^a   Bernier, Kathleen Y ^b   McWilliam, R A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CHILD HEALTH CARE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVELOPMENTAL DISORDER; EVALUATION; EXAMINATION; FEMALE; HEALTH PROGRAM; HEALTH SERVICE; HEALTH STATISTICS; HOME CARE; HUMAN; INFANT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; PATIENT REFERRAL; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 0036959864     PISSN: 10538151     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/105381510202500103     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Arcia, E., & Gallagher, J. J. (1993). Recommendations for state data systems: The importance of socioeconomic variables. Chapel Hill, NC: Carolina Institute for Child and Family Policy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
2. Bailey, D. B. (2000). The federal role in early intervention: Prospects for the future. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 20, 71-78.
3. Bernier, K. Y. (1994). Early intervention service utilization in North Carolina: Differences between children with and without Medicaid. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina.
4. Harbin, G. (1999, March). North Carolina's early intervention system for children ages birth-through-five years: A comprehensive review. Report to the North Carolina Legislature. Chapel Hill, NC: Frank Porter Graham Child Development Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
5. Hebbeler, K. (1993). Data systems in early intervention. Chapel Hill, NC: Carolina Institute for Child and Family Policy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
6. Kochanek, T. T., & Buka, S. (1998). Influential factors in the utilization of early intervention services. Journal of Early Intervention, 21, 323-338.
7. Meisels, S. J., & Provence, S. (1996). Screening and assessment: Guidelines for identifying young disabled and developmentally vulnerable children and their families. Washington, DC: Zero to Three.
8. National Early Childhood Technical Assistance System and Office of Special Education Programs, U.S. Department of Education (1998). Part C updates: Third in a series of updates on selected aspects of the early intervention program for infants and toddlers with disabilities, Part C of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). Chapel Hill, NC: Author.
9. National Early Childhood Technical Assistance System (1995). What's happening with Part H data systems: Summary document of the current status and nature of Part H data systems. Chapel Hill, NC: Author.
10. Porter, P., & Buysse, V. (1996). The effects of Smart Start on young children with disabilities and their families. Chapel Hill, NC: Frank Porter Graham Child Development Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
11. Roberts, R. N., Innocenti, M. S., & Goetze, L. (1999). Emerging issues from state level evaluations of early intervention programs. Journal of Early Intervention, 22, 152-163.
12. Spiker, D., Hebbeler, K., Wagner, M., Cameto, R., & McKenna, P. (2000). A framework for describing variations in state early intervention systems. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 20, 195-207.
13. U.S. Census Bureau (2000). Retrieved May 15, 2002, from http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/BasicFactsServlet.
14. U.S. Department of Education (1999). Twenty-first annual report to congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. Washington, DC: Author.
15. U.S. Department of Education (2000). Twenty-second annual report to congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. Washington, DC: Author.