A Framework for Describing Variations in State Early Intervention Systems

Topics in Early Childhood Special Education

Volumn 20, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 195-207

  Spiker, Donna ^a   Hebbeler, Kathleen ^a   Wagner, Mary ^a   Cameto, Renee ^a   McKenna, Patti ^a  

^a SRI INTERNATIONAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034551877     PISSN: 02711214     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/027112140002000401     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Bailey, D.B., Aytch, L.S., Odom, S.L., Symons, E., & Wolery, M. (1999). Early intervention as we know it. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 5, 11-20.
2. Bailey, D.B., McWilliam, R.A., Darkes, L.A., Hebbeler, K., Simeonsson, R.J., Spiker, D., & Wagner, M. (1998). Family outcomes in early intervention: A framework for program evaluation and efficacy research. Exceptional Children, 64, 313-328.
3. Bruder, M.B., & Bologna, T. (1993). Collaboration and service coordination for effective early intervention. In W Brown, S. K. Thurman, & L. F. Pearl (Eds.), Family-centered early intervention with infants and toddlers: Innovative cross-disciplinary approaches (pp. 103-127). Baltimore: Brookes.
4. Bryant, D.M., & Graham, M.A. (1993). Models of service delivery. In D. M. Bryant & M. A. Graham (Eds.), Implementing early intervention: From research to effective practice (pp. 183-215). New York: Guilford.
5. Dinnebeil, L.A., Hale, L.M., & Rule, S. (1996). A qualitative analysis of parents' and service coordinators' description of variables that influence collaborative relationships. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 16, 322-347.
6. Dinnebeil, L.A., & Rule, S. (1994). Variables that influence collaboration between parents and service coordinators. Journal of Early Intervention, 18, 349-361.
7. Division of Early Childhood Task Force on Recommended Practices. (1993). DEC recommended practices: Indicators of quality in programs for infants and young children with special needs and their families. Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.
8. Education of the Handicapped Amendments of 1986, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq.
9. Florian, L. (1995). Part C early intervention program: Legislative history and the intent of the law. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 15, 247-262.
10. Fraas, C.J. (1986). Preschool programs for the education of handicapped children: Background, issues, and federal policy options. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.
11. Gallagher, J.J., Harbin, G., Eckland, J., & Clifford, R. (1994). State diversity and policy implementation: Infants and toddlers. In L. J. Johnson, R. J. Gallagher, M. J. LaMontagne, J. B. Jordan, & J. J. Gallagher (Eds.), Meeting early intervention challenges: Issues from birth to three (2nd ed.). Baltimore: Brookes.
12. Gallagher, R.J., LaMontagne, M.J., & Johnson, L.J. (1994). Early intervention: The collaborative challenge. In L. J. Johnson, R. J. Gallagher, M. J. LaMontagne, J. B. Jordan, & J. J. Gallagher (Eds.), Meeting early intervention challenges: Issues from birth to three (2nd ed., pp. 235-250). Baltimore: Brookes.
13. Garland, C.W., & Linder, T.W. (1994). Administrative challenges in early intervention. In L. J. Johnson, R. J. Gallagher, M. J. LaMontagne, J. B. Jordan, & J. J. Gallagher (Eds.), Meeting early intervention challenges: Issues from birth to three (2nd ed., pp. 133-166). Baltimore: Brookes.
14. Harbin, G.L., Kochanek, T.T., McWilliam, R.A., Gallagher, J.J., Shaw, D., Tocci, L., Buka, S.L., West, T., Sideris, J., & Clark, K. (1998). Implementing federal policy for young children with disabilities: How are we doing? Chapel Hill: Early Childhood Research Institute on Service Utilization. Available: www.unc.edu/depts/ecri
15. Hebbeler, K.M. (1997). A system in a system: Sociopolitical factors and early intervention. In S. K. Thurman, J. R. Cornwell, & S. R. Gottwald (Eds.), Contexts of early intervention: Systems and settings (pp. 19-38). Baltimore: Brookes.
16. Hebbeler, K., & Wagner, M. (1998). The National Early Intervention Longitudinal Study (NEILS) design overview. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International. Available: www.sri.com.neils
17. Hurth, J. (1998). Service coordination caseloads in state early intervention systems. Chapel Hill: National Early Childhood Technical Assistance System. Available: www.nectas.unc.edu
18. Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 1990, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq
19. Kochanek, T.T., & Buka, S.L. (1998). Patterns of service utilization: Child, maternal, and service provider factors. Journal of Early Intervention, 21, 217-231.
20. Meisels, S.J., Harbin, G., Modigliani, K., & Olson, T. (1988). Formulating optimal state early childhood intervention policies. Exceptional Children, 55, 159-165.
21. Roberts, R.N., Akers, A.L., & Behl, D.D. (1996). Family-level service coordination within home visiting programs. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 16, 279-301.
22. Roberts, R.N., Innocenti, M.S., & Goetze, L.D. (1999). Emerging issues from state level evaluations of early intervention programs. Journal of Early Intervention, 22, 152-163.
23. Romer, E.E., & Umbreit, J. (1998). The effects of family-centered service coordination: A social validity study. Journal of Early Intervention, 21, 95-110.
24. Rosenkoetter, S.E., Shotts, C.K., Streufert, C.A., Rosenkoetter, L.I., Campbell, M., & Torrez, J. (1995). Local interagency coordinating councils as infrastructures for early intervention: One state's implementation. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 15, 264-280.
25. Safer, N.D., & Hamilton, J.L. (1993). Legislative context for early intervention services. In W Brown, S. K. Thurman, & L. F. Pearl (Eds.), Family-centered early intervention with infants and toddlers: Innovative cross-disciplinary approaches (pp. 1-19). Baltimore: Brookes.
26. Shackelford, J. (1998). State and jurisdictional eligibility definitions for infants and toddlers with disabilities under IDEA. Chapel Hill: National Early Childhood Technical Assistance System. Available: www.nectas.unc.edu