Advocates, critics and union involvement in workplace partnership: Irish Airports

British Journal of Industrial Relations

Volumn 40, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 659-688

  Roche, William K ^a   Geary, John F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE DUBLIN   (Ireland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036946836     PISSN: 00071080     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1467-8543.00251     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Bacon, N. and Storey, J. (2000). 'New employee relations strategies in Britain: towards individualism or partnership? British Journal of Industrial Relations, 38: 407-28.
2. Clarke, L. and Haiven, L. (1999). 'Workplace change and continuous bargaining: Saskatoon chemicals then and now'. Relations Industrielles, 54: 168-91.
3. Deery, S. J., Iverson, R. D. and Erwin, P. J. (1994). 'Predicting organizational and union commitment: the effect of industrial relations climate'. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 32: 581-97.
4. Freeman, R. B. and Rogers, J. (1999). What Workers Want. Ithaca, NY: ILR Press.
5. Geary, J. F. and Roche, W. K. (2002). 'Workplace partnership and the theory of the displaced activist', mimeo.
6. Gordon, M. E., Philbot, J. W., Burt, R., Thompson, C. A. and Spiller, W. A. (1980). 'Commitment to the union: development of a measure and an examination of its correlates'. Journal of Applied Psychology, 43: 37-64.
7. Guest, D. and Peccei, R. (2001). 'Partnership at work: mutuality and the balance of advantage'. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 39: 207-36.
8. Heckscher, C. C. (1996). The New Unionism: Employee Involvement in the Changing Corporation. Ithaca, NY: ILR Press.
9. Kelly, J. (1996). 'Union militancy and social partnership'. In P. Ackers, C. Smith and P. Smith (eds.), The New Workplace and Trade Unionism. London: Routledge.
10. _ (1998). Rethinking Industrial Relations: Mobilization, Collectivism and Long Waves. London: Routledge.
11. _ (1999). 'Social partnership in Britain: good for profits, bad for jobs and unions'. Communist Review, Autumn: 3-10.
12. Kochan, T. (1995). 'Using the Dunlop Report to achieve mutual gains'. Industrial Relations, 34: 350-66.
13. _ and Osterman, P. (1994). The Mutual Gains Enterprise: Forging a Winning Partnership among Labor, Management and Government. Boston, Mass.: Harvard Business School Press.
14. Marks, A., Findlay, P., Hine, J., McKinlay, A. and Thompson, P. (1998). 'The politics of partnership? Innovation in employment relations in the Scottish spirits industry'. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 36: 209-26.
15. Offer, M. (1998). 'The views of shop stewards at Shannon Airport: key points from the Report'. Unpublished paper, Aer Rianta, Dublin.
16. Roche, W. K. and Geary, J. F. (2000). '"Collaborative production" and the Irish boom: work organization, partnership and direct involvement in Irish workplaces'. Economic and Social Review, 31: 1-36.
17. Royle, T. (1998). 'Avoidance strategies and the German system of co-determination'. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 9: 1026-7.
18. Rubinstein, S. A. and Kochan, T. (2001). Learning from Saturn. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
19. Storey, J. and Sisson, K. (1993). Managing Human Resources and Industrial Relations. Buckingham: Open University Press.
20. Streeck, W. (1992). 'National diversity, regime competition and institutional deadlock: problems in forming a European industrial relations system'. Journal of Public Policy, 12: 301-30.
21. _ (1994). 'European social policy after Maastricht: the Social Dialogue and subsidiarity'. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 15: 151-77.
22. _ (1995). 'Works councils in western Europe: from consultation to participation'. In J. Rogers and W. Streeck (eds.), Works Councils: Consultation, Representation and Co-operation in Industrial Relations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
23. Thelen, K. (1991). Union of Parts: Labor Politics in Postwar Germany. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
24. Weiler, P. C. (1990). Governing the Workplace: The Future of Labor and Employment Law. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.