Femoral anatomy, computed tomography and computer-aided design of prosthetic implants

Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery

Volumn 122, Issue 5, 2002, Pages 262-268

  Adam, Frank ^a   Hammer, D S ^a   Pape, D ^a   Kohn, D ^a  

^a SAARLAND UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Anatomy; Computed tomography; Computer aided design; Femur; Prosthetic implants

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CADAVER; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORTICAL BONE; ENDOPROSTHESIS; FEMALE; FEMUR; GEOMETRY; HIP SURGERY; HUMAN; IMAGING SYSTEM; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURGICAL ANATOMY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; FEMALE; FEMUR; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 0036943222     PISSN: 09368051     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00402-001-0361-8     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Aamodt A, Kvistad KA, Andersen E, Lund-Larsen J, Eine J, Benum P, Husby OS (1999) Determination of Hounsfield value for CT-based design of custom femoral stems. J Bone Joint Surg Br 81: 143-147
2. Adam F, Hammer D, Pape D, Kohn D (2001) The internal calcar septum (femoral thigh spur) in computed tomography and conventional radiography. Skeletal Radiol 30: 77-83
3. Bargar WL (1989) Shape the implant to the patient. A rationale for the use of custom-fit cementless total hip implants. Clin Orthop 249: 73-78
4. Brown TD, Ferguson AB Jr (1980) Mechanical property distributions in the cancellous bone of the human proximal femur. Acta Orthop Scand 51: 429-437
5. Capello WN (1989) Fit the patient to the prosthesis. An argument against the routine use of custom hip implants. Clin Orthop 249: 56-59
6. Clarke HJ, Jinnah RH, Cox QG, Curtis MJ (1992) Computerized templating in uncemented total hip arthroplasty to assess component fit and fill. J Arthroplasty 7: 235-239
7. Dai KR, An KN, Hein Tjea (1985) Geometric and biomechanical analysis of the human femur. Orthop Trans 10: 256-261
8. Dougherty G, Newman D (1999) Measurement of thickness and density of thin structures by computed tomography: a simulation study. Med Phys 26: 1341-1348
9. Elke RP, Cheal EJ, Simmons C, Poss R (1995) Three-dimensional anatomy of the cancellous structures within the proximal femur from computed tomography data. J Orthop Res 13: 513-523
10. Horne G (1992) Fit and fill: fashionable fact or fantasy? J Bone Joint Surg Br 74: 4-5
11. Iguchi H, Hua J, Walker PS (1996) Accuracy of using radiographs for custom hip stem design. J Arthroplasty 11: 312-321
12. Laine HJ, Kontola K, Lehto MU, Pitkanen M, Jarske P, Lindholm TS (1997) Image processing for femoral endosteal anatomy detection: description and testing of a computed tomography based program. Phys Med Biol 42: 1673-1689
13. Laine HJ, Lehto MU, Moilanen T (2000) Diversity of proximal femoral medullary canal. J Arthroplasty 15: 86-92
14. Mallory TH, Head WC, Lombardi AV (1997) Tapered design for the cementless total hip arthroplasty femoral component. Clin Orthop 344: 172-178
15. Merkel FR (1874) Bemerkungen über das Os femoris. Arch Pathol Anat 59: 237-241
16. Noble PC, Alexander JW, Lindahl LJ, Yew DT, Granberry WM, Tullos HS (1988) The anatomic basis of femoral component design. Clin Orthop 235: 148-165
17. Noble PC, Box GG, Kamaric E, Fink MJ, Alexander JW, Tullos HS (1995) The effect of aging on the shape of the proximal femur. Clin Orthop 316: 31-44
18. Robertson DD (1988) Improving the fit of press-fit hip stems. Clin Orthop 228: 134-140
19. Robertson DD, Walker PS, Granholm JW, Nelson PC, Weiss PJ, Fishman EK, Magid D (1987) Design of custom hip stem prostheses using three-dimensional CT modeling. J Comput Assist Tomogr 5: 804-809
20. Rubin PJ, Leyvraz PF, Aubaniac JM, Argenson JN, Esteve P, De Roguin B (1992) The morphology of the proximal femur. A three-dimensional radiographic analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 74: 28-32
21. Smith HW, De Smet AA, Levine E (1982) Measurement of cortical thickness in a human cadaver femur. Conventional roentgenography versus computed tomography. Clin Orthop 169: 269-274
22. Sugano N, Ohzono K, Nishii T, Haraguchi K, Sakai T, Ochi T (1998) Computed-tomography-based computer preoperative planning for total hip arthroplasty. Comput Aided Surg 3: 320-324
23. Sugiyama H, Whiteside LA, Engh CA (1992) Torsional fixation of the femoral component in total hip arthroplasty. The effect of surgical press-fit technique. Clin Orthop 275: 187-193
24. Walker PS (1987) Strains and micromotions of press-fit femoral stem prostheses. J Biomech 20: 693-702
25. Walker PS (1988) Design and fabrication of cementless hip stems. Clin Orthop 235: 25-34
26. Woolson ST, Dev P, Fellingham LL, Vassiliadis A (1986) Three-dimensional imaging of bone from computerized tomography. Clin Orthop 202: 239-248
27. Zweymüller KA, Lintner FK, Semlitsch MF (1988) Biologic fixation of a press-fit titanium hip joint endoprosthesis. Clin Orthop 235: 195-206