Recent trends in information literacy and instruction

Reference and User Services Quarterly

Volumn 42, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 124-132

  Arp, Lori ^a   Woodard, Beth S ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036939270     PISSN: 10949054     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (49)

1. Association of College and Research Libraries, "Information Literacy Competency Standards for Higher Education" (2000). Accessed Aug. 29, 2002, www.ala.org/acrl/ilstandardlo.html.
2. I b i d.
3. See, for example, wealth of program development described in the California State University Information Competence Project. Accessed Aug. 29, 2002, www.lib.calpoly.edu/infocomp.
4. Committee on Information Technology Literacy, "Being Fluent with Information Technology" (Washington, D.C.: National Academy Pr., 1999).
5. Ibid., 2.
6. I b i d.
7. I b i d.
8. Technology Across the Curriculum program, George Mason University. Accessed Aug. 29, 2002, http://cas.gmu.edu/tac.
9. Associated Colleges of the South, "ACS Information Fluency Project, First Year Report," 2000. Accessed Aug. 29, 2002, www.colleges.org/̃if/reports/if_yr1_report.pdf; Wenxian Zhang, "Developing Web-Enhanced Learning for Information Fluency: A Liberal Arts College's Perspective," Reference & User Services Quarterly 41 (summer 2002): 356-63; Sharon Fass McEuen, "How Fluent with Technology Are Our Students?" Educause Quarterly 24, no. 4 (2001): 8-17.
10. Associated Colleges of the South, "ACS Information Fluency Project, First Year Report," 2000. Accessed Aug. 29, 2002, www.colleges.org/̃if/reports/if_yr1_report.pdf; Wenxian Zhang, "Developing Web-Enhanced Learning for Information Fluency: A Liberal Arts College's Perspective," Reference & User Services Quarterly 41 (summer 2002): 356-63; Sharon Fass McEuen, "How Fluent with Technology Are Our Students?" Educause Quarterly 24, no. 4 (2001): 8-17.
11. Associated Colleges of the South, "ACS Information Fluency Project, First Year Report," 2000. Accessed Aug. 29, 2002, www.colleges.org/̃if/reports/if_yr1_report.pdf; Wenxian Zhang, "Developing Web-Enhanced Learning for Information Fluency: A Liberal Arts College's Perspective," Reference & User Services Quarterly 41 (summer 2002): 356-63; Sharon Fass McEuen, "How Fluent with Technology Are Our Students?" Educause Quarterly 24, no. 4 (2001): 8-17.
12. Ned Kock, Robert Aiken, and Cheryl Sandas, "Using Complex IT in Specific Domains: Developing and Assessing a Course for Nonmajors," IEEE Transactions in Education 45 (Feb. 2002): 50-57.
13. National Commission on Excellence in Education, A Nation at Risk: the Imperative for Educational Reform (Washington, D.C.: Dept. of Education, 1983).
14. American Association of School Librarians (AASL) and Association for Educational Communication and Technology (AECT), Information Power: Building Partnerships for Learning (Chicago: ALA, 1998). Accessed Aug. 29, 2002, www.ala.org/aasl/ip_nine.html.
15. I b i d.
16. International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE), Technology Foundations Standards for Students. Accessed Aug. 29, 2002, http://cnets.iste.org/sfors.htm.
17. I b i d.
18. National Educational Technology Standards for Teachers. Accessed Aug. 29, 2002, http://cnets.iste.org/index3.html.
19. Colorado Standards for Information Literacy. Accessed Aug. 29, 2002, www.cde.state.co.us/litguidelines/litstandards.htm.
20. Draft of the Colorado Plan for Educational Technology and Information Literacy. Accessed Aug. 29, 2002, www.cde.state.co.us/cdtech/download/pdf/et_state-plan.pdf.
21. International Technology Education Association, Technology for All Americans: a Rationale and Structure for the Study of Technology (Reston, Va.: ITEA, 1996).
22. Jennifer Laherty, "Promoting Information Literacy for Science Education Programs: Correlating National Science Education Content Standards with the Association of College and Research Libraries Information Competency Standards for Higher Education," Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship 28 (fall 2000). Accessed Aug. 29, 2002, www.istl.org/istl/00-fall/article3.html.
23. Bonnie Gratch-Lindauer, "Comparing Regional Accreditation Standards: Outcomes Assessment and Other Trends," Journal of Academic Librarianship 28 (Jan.-Mar. 2002): 14-25.
24. Ibid., 16.
25. Ibid., 19.
26. Samuel S. Green, "Personal Relations between Librarians and Readers," American Library Journal 1 (Oct. 1876): 80.
27. Lisa Janicke-Hinchliffe and Beth Woodard, "Instruction," in Reference and Information Services: An Introduction, ed. Richard E. Bopp and Linda C. Smith (Englewood, Colo.: Libraries Unlimited, 2001), 175-209.
28. Cerise Oberman and Katrina Strauch, eds., Theories of Bibliographic Education: Designs for Teaching (New York: R.R. Bowker, 1982), vii.
29. Michael Keresztesi, "The Science of Bibliography: Theoretical Implications for Bibliographic Instruction," Theories of Bibliographic Education: Designs for Teaching, ed. Cerise Oberman and Katrina Strauch (New York: R.R. Bowker, 1982), 2.
30. Ibid., 15.
31. I b i d.
32. Ibid., 17.
33. ALA Presidential Committee on Information Literacy, Final Report (Chicago: ALA, 1989). Accessed Aug. 29, 2002, www.ala.org/acrl/nili/ilit1st.html.
34. Loanne Snavely and Natasha Cooper, "The Information Literacy Debate," Journal of Academic Librarianship 23 (Jan. 1997): 9-14.
35. Christine S. Doyle, "Development of a Model of Information Literacy Outcome Measures within National Education Goals of 1990" (Ph.D. diss., Northern Arizona State University, 1992).
36. Christine Bruce, "The Seven Faces of Information Literacy" (Adelaide: Auslib Pr., 1997). Accessed Aug. 29, 2002, www.fit.qut.edu.au/InfoSys/bruce/inflit/faces/faces1.htm.
37. I b i d.
38. Theresa Y. Neely, Sociological and Psychological Aspects of Information Literacy in Higher Education (Lanham, Md.: Scarecrow, 2002), 9.
39. Associated Colleges of the South, "ACS Information Fluency Project, First Year Report" (2000).
40. ACRL, "Information Literacy Competency Standards for Higher Education" (2000).
41. Committee on Information Technology Literacy, Being Fluent in with Information Technology (Washington, D.C.: National Academy Pr., 1999), 34.
42. I b i d.
43. AASL and AECT, "The Nine Information Literacy Standards for Student Learning," Information Power: Building Partnerships for Learning (Chicago: ALA, 1998).
44. International Society for Technology in Education, "Technology Foundations Standards for Students." Accessed Aug. 29, 2002, http://cnets.iste.org/sfors.htm.
45. Technology Foundations Standards for Students
46. Ann Lathrop and Kathleen Foss, Student Cheating and Plagiarism in the Internet Era (Englewood, Colo.: Libraries Unlimited, 2000) and Lise Buranen and Alice M. Roy, eds., Perspectives on Plagiarism and Intellectual Property in a Post Modern World (Albany: State Univ. of New York Pr., 1999).
47. See, e.g., the University of Colorado at Boulder Honor Code. Accessed Aug. 29, 2002, www.colorado.edu/academics/honor-code.
48. Robert McClintock, Renewing the Progressive Contract with Posterity: On the Social Construction of Digital Learning Communities (New York: Columbia Univ., 1996). Accessed Aug. 29, 2002, www.ilt.columbia.edu/mcclintock/renew.
49. Carolyn Kuhlthau, "Literacy and Learning for the Information Age," in Learning and Libraries in an Information Age: Principles and Practice, ed. B.K. Stripling (Englewood, Colo.: Libraries Unlimited, 1999), 7.