Non-triviality and identification of a constrained Tucker3 analysis

Journal of Chemometrics

Volumn 16, Issue 12, 2002, Pages 609-612

  Ten Berge, Jos M F ^a   Smilde, Age K ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Candecomp Parafac; Constrained Tucker; Grey models; Tucker3; Typical rank; Uniqueness

Indexed keywords

CANDECOMP; CANDECOMP/PARAFAC; CONSTRAINED TUCK; ESTIMATED PARAMETER; GRAY MODEL; PARAFAC; PROPERTY; TUCKER3; TYPICAL RANK; UNIQUENESS;

PARAMETER ESTIMATION;

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING; CHEMISTRY; CHEMOMETRIC ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; REVIEW;

EID: 0036934940     PISSN: 08869383     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cem.760     Document Type: Review

References (21)

1. Manne R. On the resolution problem in hyphenated chromatography. Chemometrics Intell. Lab. Syst. 1995; 27: 89-94.
2. Tauler R, Smilde AK and Kowalski BR. Selectivity, local rank, three-way data analysis and ambiguity in multivariate curve resolution. J. Chemometrics 1995; 9: 31-58.
3. Carroll JD and Chang J. Analysis of individual differences in multidimensional scaling via an N-way generalization of 'Eckart-Young' decomposition. Psychometrika 1970; 35: 283-319.
4. Harshman RA. Foundations of the PARAFAC procedure: models and conditions for an 'explanatory' multimodal factor analysis. UCLA Working Papers Phonet. 1970; 16: 1-84.
5. Kiers HAL and Smilde AK. Some theoretical results on second-order calibration methods for data with and without rank overlap. J. Chemometrics 1995; 9: 179-195.
6. Sanchez E and Kowalski BR. Tensorial calibration: 2. Second-order calibration. J. Chemometrics 1988; 2: 265-280.
7. Ross RT, Lee C, Davis CM, Ezzeddine BM, Fayyad EA and Leurgans SE. Resolution of the fluorescence spectra of plant pigment-complexes using trilinear models. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1991; 1056: 317-320.
8. Bro R. Exploratory study of sugar production using fluorescence spectroscopy and multi-way analysis. Chemometrics Intell. Lab. Syst. 1999; 46: 133-147.
9. Tucker LR. Some mathematical notes on three-mode factor analysis. Psychometrika 1966; 31: 279-311.
10. Kroonenberg PM and De Leeuw J. Principal component analysis of three-mode data by means of alternating least squares algorithms. Psychometrika 1980; 45: 69-97.
11. Kiers HAL, ten Berge JMF and Rocci R. Uniqueness of three-mode factor models with sparse cores: the 3 × 3 × 3 case. Psychometrika 1997; 62: 349-374.
12. Smilde AK, Tauler R, Henshaw JM, Burgess LW and Kowalski BR. Multicomponent determination of chlorinated hydrocarbons using a reaction-based chemical sensor. 3. Medium-rank second-order calibration with restricted Tucker models. Anal. Chem. 1994; 66: 3345-3351.
13. Kiers HAL and Smilde AK. Constrained three-mode factor analysis as a tool for parameter estimation with second-order instrumental data. J. Chemometrics 1998; 12: 125-147.
14. Rocci R and ten Berge JMF. Transforming three-way arrays to maximal simplicity. Psychometrika 2002; 67(3): 351-365.
15. Gurden SP, Westerhuis JA and Smilde AK. Modelling of spectroscopic batch process data using grey models to incorporate external information. J. Chemometrics 2001; 15: 101-121.
16. Kruskal JB. Three-way arrays: rank and uniqueness of trilinear decompositions with applications to arithmetic complexity and statistics. Linear Algebra Appl. 1977; 18: 95-138.
17. Kruskal JB. Rank, decomposition, and uniqueness for 3-way and N-way arrays. In Multiway Data Analysis, Coppi R, Bolasco S (eds). Elsevier: Amsterdam, 1989; 8-18.
18. Ten Berge JMF. The typical rank of tall three-way arrays. Psychometrika 2000; 65: 525-532.
19. Fisher RM. The Identification Problem in Econometrics. McGraw-Hill: New York, 1966.
20. Smilde AK, Hoefsloot HCJ, Kiers HAL, Bijlsma S and Boelens HFM. Sufficient conditions for unique solutions within a certain class of curve resolution models. J. Chemometrics 2001; 15: 405-411.
21. Gurden SP, Westerhuis JA and Smilde AK. Monitoring of batch processes using spectroscopy. AIChE J. 2002; 48: 2283-2297.