Uniqueness of three-mode factor models with sparse cores: The 3 × 3 × 3 case

Psychometrika

Volumn 62, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 349-374

  Kiers, Henk A L ^b   Ten Berge, Jos M F ^c   Rocci, Roberto ^a  

^a SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

^b NONE   (Netherlands)

^c NONE

Author keywords

PARAFAC; Three way methods

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031477528     PISSN: 00333123     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF02294556     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Carroll, J. D., & Chang, J.-J. (1970). Analysis of individual differences in multidimensional scaling via an n-way generalization of "Eckart-Young" decomposition. Psychometrika, 35, 283-319.
2. Harshman, R. A. (1970). Foundations of the PARAFAC procedure: models and conditions for an "explanatory" multi-mode factor analysis, (UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics No. 16, pp. 1-84). Los Angeles: University of California at Los Angeles.
3. Harshman, R. A. (1972). Determination and proof of minimum uniqueness conditions for PARAFAC1, (UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics No. 22, pp. 111-117). Los Angeles: University of California at Los Angeles.
4. Harshman, R. A., & Lundy, M. E. (1984). The PARAFAC model for three-Way factor analysis and multidimensional scaling. In H. G. Law, C. W. Snyder, J. A. Hattie, and R. P. McDonald (Eds.), Research methods for multimode data analysis (pp. 122-215). New York: Praeger.
5. Kiers, H. A. L. (1992). Tuckals core rotations and constrained Tuckals modelling. Statistica Applicata, 4, 659-667.
6. Kiers, H. A. L. (in press). Three-mode Orthomax rotation. Psychometrika.
7. Kroonenberg, P. M. (1983). Three mode principal component analysis: Theory and applications. Leiden: DSWO press.
8. Kroonenberg, P. M., & de Leeuw, J. (1980). Principal component analysis of three-mode data by means of alternating least squares algorithms. Psychometrika, 45, 69-97.
9. Kruskal, J. B. (1977). Three-way arrays: Rank and uniqueness of trilinear decompositions, with applications to arithmetic complexity and statistics. Linear Algebra and Its Applications, 18, 95-138.
10. Kruskal, J. B. (1988, June). Simple structure for three-way data: A new method to intermediate between 3-mode factor analysis and PARAFAC/CANDECOMP. Paper presented at the 53rd Annual meeting of the Psychometric Society, Los Angeles.
11. Kruskal, J. B. (1989). Rank, decomposition, and uniqueness for 3-way and N-way arrays. In: R. Coppi & S. Bolasco (Eds.), Multiway data analysis (pp. 7-18). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers.
12. Leurgans, S., & Ross, R. T. (1992). Multilinear models: Applications in Spectroscopy. Statistical Science, 7, 289-319.
13. Lundy, M. E., Harshman, R. A., & Kruskal, J. B. (1985). A two-stage procedure incorporating good features of both trilinear and quadrilinear models. In R. Coppi & S. Bolasco (Eds.), Multiway data analysis (pp. 123-130). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers.
14. Rocci, R. (1992). Three-mode factor analysis with binary core and orthonormality constraints. Journal of the Italian Statistical Society, 3, 413-422.
15. Smilde, A. K., Wang, Y., & Kowalski, B. R. (1994). Theory of medium-rank second-order calibration with restricted-Tucker models. Journal of Chemometrics, 8, 21-36.
16. Tucker, L. R. (1966). Some mathematical notes on three-mode factor analysis. Psychometrika, 31, 279-311.