Evolutionary relationships of southern ocean Octopodidae (Cephalopoda: Octopoda) and a new diagnosis of Pareledone

Marine Biology

Volumn 140, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 129-135

  Allcock, A L ^a   Piertney, S B ^b  

^a DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL SCIENCES   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CEPHALOPOD; EVOLUTION; MORPHOLOGY; PHYLOGENETICS;

SOUTHERN OCEAN;

BATHYPOLYPODINAE; CEPHALOPODA; ELEDONINAE; GRANELEDONINAE; INVERTEBRATA; OCTOPODA; OCTOPODIDAE; OCTOPODINAE; PARELEDONE; PARELEDONE POLYMORPHA;

EID: 0036933532     PISSN: 00253162     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s002270100687     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Bonnaud L, Boucher-Rodoni R, Monerot M (1994) Phylogeny of decapod cephalopods based on partial 16s nDNA nucleotide sequences. C R Acad Sci Paris 317:581-588
2. Daly HI, Rodhouse PG (1994) Comparative morphology of two sympatric Pareledone species from South Georgia. Antarct Sci 6:163-169
3. Kattner G (ed) (1998) The expedition ANTARKTIS XIV/2 of RV "Polarstern" in 1996/7. Ber Polarforsch 274
4. Kubodera T, Okutani T (1986) New and rare cephalopods from the Antarctic waters. Mem Natl Inst Polar Res [special issue] 44:129-141
5. Kubodera T, Okutani T (1994) Eledonine octopods from the Southern Ocean: Systematics and distribution. Antarct Sci 6:205-214
6. Lu CC, Stranks TN (1994) Synopsis of Pareledone and Megaleledone species, with description of two new species from East Antarctica (Cephalopoda: Octopodidae). Mere Natl Mus Vic 54:221-242
7. Naef A (1923) Die Cephalopoden. Fauna Flora Golf Neapel 35:149-836
8. Robson GC (1929) A Monograph of the Recent Cephalopoda, Part I. Octopodinae. British Museum (Natural History), London
9. Robson GC (1930) Cephalopoda I. Octopoda. 'Discovery' Rep 2:371-402
10. Robson GC (1932) A Monograph of the Recent Cephalopoda, Part II. Octopoda (Excluding Octopodinae). British Museum (Natural History), London
11. Roper CFE, Voss GL (1983) Guidelines for taxonomic descriptions of cephalopod species. Mem Natl Mus Vic 44:13-27
12. Shaw PW, Pierce GJ, Boyle PR (1999) Subtle population structuring within a highly vagile marine invertebrate, the veined squid, Loligo forbesi, demonstrated with microsatellite DNA markers. Mol Ecol 8:407-417
13. Sweeney MJ, Roper CFE (1998) Classification, type localities, and type repositories of recent Cephalopoda. Smithson Contrib Zool 586:561-599
14. Swofford DL (1985) PAUP: Phylogenetic Inference Using Parsimony. Illinois Natural History Survey, Champaign
15. Taki I (1961) On two new eledonid octopods from the Antarctic Sea. J Fac Fish Anim Husb Hiroshima Univ 3:297-319
16. Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG (1997) The ClustalX Windows interface: Flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res 24:4876-4882
17. Voight JR (1993a) The association between distribution and octopodid morphology: Implications for classification. Zool J Linn Soc 108:209-223
18. Voight JR (1993b) A cladistic reassessment of octopodid classification. Malacologia 35:343-349
19. Voss GL (1976) Two new species of octopods of the genus Graneledone (Mollusca: Cephalopoda) from the Southern Ocean. Proc Biol Soc Wash 88:447-458
20. Voss GL (1977) Present status and new trends in cephalopod systematics. Symp Zool Soc Lond 38:40-60
21. Voss GL (1988a) Evolution and phylogenetic relationships of deepsea octopods (Cirrata and Incirrata) In: Clarke MR, Trueman ER (eds) The Mollusca, Vol. 12. Paleontology and Neontology of Cephalopods. Academic Press, London, pp 253-276
22. Voss GL (1988b) The biogeography of the deep-sea Octopoda. Malacologia 29:295-307