Prejudice, internalization, and the accessibility of personal standards for responding to gay men

Journal of Homosexuality

Volumn 43, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 39-60

  Jacks, Julia Zuwerink ^a   Devine, Patricia G ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT GREENSBORO   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

Accessibility; Gay men; Heterosexual attitudes; Homosexuality; Intergroup relations; Prejudice; Social cognition

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTITUDE; COGNITION; COLLEGE STUDENT; FEMALE; HETEROSEXUALITY; HOMOSEXUALITY; HUMAN; INTERNALIZATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; QUESTIONNAIRE; RATING SCALE; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SEXUAL ORIENTATION; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; STANDARD;

FEMALE; HOMOSEXUALITY, MALE; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; MALE; PREJUDICE; SOCIAL VALUES;

EID: 0036930202     PISSN: 00918369     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1300/J082v43n01_03     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Allport, G. W. (1954). The Nature of Prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
2. Biernat, M., Vescio, T. K., Theno, S. A., & Crandall, C. S. (1996). Values and prejudice: Toward understanding the impact of American values on outgroup attitudes. In C. Seligman, J. M. Olson, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), The Psychology of Values: The Ontario Symposium (Vol. 8, pp. 153-189). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
3. Brigham, J. C. (1993). College students' racial attitudes. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23, 1933-1967.
4. Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1981). Attention and Self-regulation: A Control-theory Approach to Human Behavior. New York: Springer-Verlag.
5. Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1982). Control-theory: A useful conceptual framework for personality-social, clinical, and health psychology. Psychological Bulletin, 92, 111-135.
6. Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1990). Principles of self-regulation: Action and emotion. In E. T. Higgins & R. M. Sorrentino (Eds.), Handbook of Motivation and Cognition: Foundations of Social Behavior (Vol. 2, pp. 3-52). New York: Guilford Press.
7. Devine, P. G. (1989). Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 5-18.
8. Devine, P. G., Evett, S. R., & Vasquez-Suson, K. A. (1996). Exploring the interpersonal dynamics of intergroup contact. In R. M. Sorrentino & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of Motivation and Cognition: The Interpersonal Context (Vol. 3, pp. 423-464). New York: Guilford.
9. Devine, P. G., & Monteith, M. J. (1993). The role of discrepancy associated affect in prejudice reduction. In D. M. Mackie & D. L. Hamilton (Eds.), Affect, Cognition, and Stereotyping: Interactive Processes in Intergroup Preception (pp. 317-344). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
10. Devine, P. G., Monteith, M. J., Zuwerink, J. R., & Elliot, A. J. (1991). Prejudice with and without compunction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 817-830.
11. Fazio, R. H. (1986). How do attitudes guide behavior? In R. M. Sorrentino & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of Motivation and Cognition (pp. 204-243). New York: Guilford.
12. Fazio, R. H. (1990a). A practical guide to the use of response latency in social psychological research. In C. Hendrick & M. S. Clark (Eds.), Research Methods in Personality and Social Psychology (Vol. 11, pp. 74-97). Newbury Park: Sage.
13. Fazio, R. H. (1990b). Multiple processes by which attitudes guide behavior: The MODE model as an integrative framework. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 23, 75-109.
14. Fazio, R. H. (1995). Attitudes as object-evaluation associations: Determinants, consequences, and correlates of attitude accessibility. In R. E. Petty & J. A. Krosnick (Eds.), Attitude Strength: Antecedents and Consequences (pp. 247-282). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
15. Fazio, R. H., Herr, P. M., & Olney, T. (1984). Attitude accessibility following a self-perception process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 277-286.
16. Fazio, R. H., Jackson, J. R., Dunton, B. C., & Williams, C. J. (1995). Variability in automatic activation as an unobtrusive measure of racial attitudes: A bona fide pipeline? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 1013-1027.
17. Gaertner, S. L., & Dovidio, J. F. (1986). The aversive form of racism. In J. F. Dovidio & S. L. Gaertner (Eds.), Prejudice, Discrimination, and Racism (pp. 61-89). New York: Academic Press.
18. Katz, I., & Hass, R. G. (1988). Racial ambivalence and American value conflict: Correlational and priming studies of dual cognitive structures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 893-905.
19. Krosnick, J. A. (1989). Attitude importance and attitude accessibility. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 15, 297-308.
20. Larsen, K. S., Reed, M., & Hoffman, S. (1980). Attitudes of heterosexuals toward homosexuality: A Likert-type scale and construct validity. Journal of Sex Research, 16, 245-257.
21. Lepore, L., & Brown, R. (1997). Category and stereotype activation: Is prejudice inevitable? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 275-287.
22. Monteith, M. J. (1993). Self-regulation of prejudiced responses: Implications for progress in prejudice reduction efforts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 469-485.
23. Monteith, M. J., Devine, P. G., & Zuwerink, J. R. (1993). Self-directed vs. other-directed affect as a consequence of prejudice-related discrepancies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 198-210.
24. Monteith, M. J., & Voils, C. I. (1998). Proneness to prejudiced responses: Toward understanding the authenticity of self-reported discrepancies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 901-916.
25. Monteith, M. J., & Walters, G. L. (1998). Egalitarianism, moral obligation, and prejudice-related personal standards. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 186-199.
26. Monteith, M. J., Zuwerink, J. R., & Devine, P. G. (1994). Prejudice and prejudice reduction: Classic challenges, contemporary approaches. In P. G. Devine, D. L Hamilton, & T. M. Ostrom (Eds.), Social Cognition: Impact on Social Psychology (pp. 323-346). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
27. Moskowitz, G. B., Salomon, A. R., & Taylor, C. M. (2000). Preconsciously controlling stereotyping: Implicitly activated egalitarian goals prevent the activation of stereo-types. Social Cognition, 18, 151-177.
28. Moskowitz, G. B., Wasel, W.; Gollwitzer, P. M., & Schaal, B. (1999). Preconscious control of stereotype activation through chronic egalitarian goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 167-184.
29. Myrdal, G. (1944). An American dilemma. New York: Harper & Row.
30. Powell, M. C., & Fazio, R. H. (1984). Attitude accessibility as a function of repeated attitudinal expression. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 10, 139-148.
31. Ratcliff, R. (1993). Methods for dealing with reaction time outliers. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 510-532.
32. Roese, N. J., & Olson, J. M. (1994). Attitude importance as a function of repeated attitude expression. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 39-51.
33. Rokeach, M. (1973). The Nature of Human Values. New York: Free Press.
34. Schuette, R. A., & Fazio, R. H. (1995). Attitude accessibility and motivation as determinants of biased processing: A test of the MODE model. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 704-710.
35. Wittenbrink, B., Judd, C. M., & Park, B. (1997). Evidence for racial prejudice at the implicit level and its relationship with questionnaire measures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 262-274.
36. Zuwerink, J. R., Monteith, M. J., Devine, P. G., & Cook, D. (1996). Prejudice toward Blacks: With and without compunction? Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 18, 131-150.