Modelling preference curves for the study of fish habitat use

Archiv fur Hydrobiologie

Volumn 155, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 615-626

  Vilizzi, L ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HERTFORDSHIRE   (United Kingdom)

^b NONE   (Italy)

Author keywords

Barbel; Barbus barbus; PHABSIM; Polynomial regression; Smoothing splines; Split plot factorial design

Indexed keywords

ECOLOGICAL MODELING; FISH; HABITAT USE; REGRESSION;

BARBUS; BARBUS BARBUS;

EID: 0036918673     PISSN: 00039136     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1127/archiv-hydrobiol/155/2002/615     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Belaud, A., Chaveroche, P., Lim, P. & Sabaton, C. (1989): Probability-of-use curves applied to brown trout (Salmo trutta fario L.) in rivers of southeastern France. - Regul. Rivers Res. Managem. 3: 321-336.
2. Bovee, K. D., Lamb, B. L., Bartholow, J. M., Stalnaker, C. B., Taylor, J. & Henriksen, J. (1998): Stream Habitat Analysis Using the Instream Flow Incremental Methodology. - U.S. Geological Survey, Biological Resources Division Information and Technology Report USGS/BRD-1998-0004. viii + 131 pp.
3. Copp, G. H. (1992): An empirical model for predicting the microhabitat of 0+ juveniles in lowland streams. - Oecologia 91: 338-345.
4. Copp, G. H., Edmonds-Brown, V. R. & Cottey, R. (1998): Behavioural interactions and microhabitat use of stream-dwelling sticklebacks Gasterosteus aculeatus and Pungitius pungitius in the laboratory and field. - Folia Zool. 47: 275-286.
5. Freeman, M. C., Bowen, Z. H. & Bovee, K. D. (1999): Transferability of habitat suitability criteria: Response to comment. - North Amer. J. Fish. Managem. 19: 626-628.
6. Freeman, M. C., Bowen, Z. H. & Crance, J. H. (1997): Transferability of habitat suitability criteria for fishes in warmwater streams. - North Amer. J. Fish. Managem. 17: 20-31.
7. Gan, K. & McMahon, T. (1990): Variability of results from the use of PHABSIM in estimating habitat area. - Regul. Rivers Res. Managem. 5: 233-239.
8. Garner, P. (1995): Suitability indices for juvenile 0+ roach [Rutilus rutilus (L.)] using point abundance sampling data. - Regul. Rivers Res. Managem. 10: 99-104.
9. _ (1997 a): Habitat use by 0+ cyprinid fish in the River Great Ouse, East Anglia. Freshwater Forum 8: 2-27.
10. _ (1997 b): Seasonal variation in the habitat available for 0+ Rutilus rutilus (L.) in a regulated river. - Aquat. Cons. 7: 199-210.
11. Guay, J. C., Boisclair, D., Rioux, D., Leclerc, M., Lapointe, M. & Legendre, P. (2000): Development and validation of numerical habitat models for juveniles of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). - Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 57: 2065-2075.
12. Hastie, T. J. & Tibshirani, R. J. (1990): Generalized Additive Models. - Chapman & Hall, London, 335 pp.
13. Heggenes, J. & Saltveit, S. J. (1990): Seasonal and spatial microhabitat selection and segregation in young Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar L., and brown trout, Salmo trutta L., in a Norwegian river. - J. Fish. Biol. 36: 707-720.
14. Johnson, I. W., Elliott, C. R. N. & Gustard, A. (1995): Mise en oeuvre de la méthode IFIM (Instream Flow Incremental Methodology), pour modéliser l'habitat des salmonidés dans la rivière Allen, Angleterre. - Bull. Fr. Pêche Piscic. 337/338/339: 355-363. (in English).
15. Kirk, R. E. (1995): Experimental Design: Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences. 3 rd Ed. - Pacific Grove, California: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company, 921 pp.
16. Leclerc, M, Boudreault, A, Bechara, J. A. & Corfa, G. (1995): Two-dimensional hydrodynamic modeling: A neglected tool in the Instream Flow Incremental Methodology. - Trans. Amer. Fish. Soc. 124: 645-662.
17. Orth, D. J. & Maughan, E. (1982): Evaluation of the incremental methodology for recommending instream flows for fishes. - Trans. Amer. Fish. Soc. 111: 413-445.
18. Pouilly, M. & Souchon, Y. (1994): Simulation de l'habitat physique du barbeau fluviatile (Barbus barbus, L. 1758): Choix des modules biologiques et sensibilité de la réponse. - Bull. Fr. Pêche Piscic. 334: 213-225.
19. Roussel, J.-M., Bardonnet, A. & Claude, A. (1999): Microhabitats of brown trout when feeding on drift and when resting in a lowland salmonid brook: Effects on Weighted Usable Area. - Arch. Hydrobiol. 146: 413-429.
20. Sempeski, P. & Gaudin, P. (1995): Établissement de courbes de préférences d'habitat pour les frayères et les jeunes stades d'ombre commun (Thymallus thymallus L.). - Bull. Fr. Pêche Piscic. 337/338/339: 277-282.
21. th Ed. - Ames: Iowa State University Press, 524 pp.
22. Stalnaker, C. B. (1979): The use of habitat structure preferenda for establishing flow regimes necessary for maintenance of fish habitat. - In: Ward, J. V. & Stanford, J. A. (eds.): The Ecology of Regulated Streams. - Plenum Press, N.Y., pp. 321-337.
23. Thomas, J. A. & Bovee, K. D. (1993): Application and testing of a procedure to evaluate transferability of habitat suitability criteria. - Reg. Rivers Res. Managem. 3: 277-289.
24. Vilizzi, L. & Copp, G. H. (2001): Behavioural responses of 0+ barbel in an artificial channel: Distribution and velocity use. - Anim. Behav. 61: 645-654.
25. Vilizzi, L. & Walker, K. F. (1999): Age and growth of the common carp, Cyprinus carpio, in the River Murray, Australia: Validation, consistency of age interpretation, and growth models. - Env. Biol. Fish. 54: 77-106.
26. Williams, J. G., Speed, T. P. & Forrest, W. M. (1999): Comment: Transferability of habitat suitability criteria. - North Amer. J. Fish. Managem. 19: 623-625.