Seasonal variation in the habitat available for 0 + Rutilus rutilus (L.) in a regulated river

Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems

Volumn 7, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 199-210

  Garner, Paul ^a  

^a FRESHWATER BIOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FISH HABITAT; HABITAT AVAILABILITY; ROACH; SEASONAL VARIATION;

UK, ENGLAND, GREAT OUSE RIVER;

RUTILUS RUTILUS;

EID: 0030730277     PISSN: 10527613     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0755(199709)7:3<199::AID-AQC228>3.0.CO;2-6     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Barnard, S. and Wyatt, R. J. 1995. 'An analysis of predictive models for stream salmonid populations', Bulletin Français de la Pêche et de la Pisciculture, 337/338/339, 365-373.
2. Bean, C. W. and Winfield, I. J. 1995. 'Habitat use and activity patterns of roach (Rutilus rutilus (L.)), rudd (Scardinius erythrophthalmus (L.)), perch (Perca fluviatilis L.) and pike (Esox lucius L.) in the laboratory: the role of predation threat and structural complexity', Ecology of Freshwater Fish, 4, 37-46.
3. Boon, P. J. 1992. 'Essential elements in the case for river conservation', in Boon, P. J., Calow, P. and Petts, G. E. (Eds), River Conservation and Management, John Wiley, Chichester, 11-34.
4. Bovee, K. D. 1978. 'The incremental method of assessing habitat potential for coolwater species, with management implications', American Fisheries Society Special Publication, 11, 340-346.
5. Bovee, K. D. 1986. 'Development and evaluation of habitat suitability criteria for use in the Instream Flow Incremental Methodology', US Fish and Wildlife Service Biological Report 86, Instream Flow Information Paper No. 21.
6. Brookes, A., Gregory, K. J. and Dawson, F. H. 1983. 'An assessment of river channelization in England and Wales', Science of the Total Environment, 27, 97-112.
7. Castleberry, D. T., Cech, J. J., Erman, D. C., Hankin, D., Healey, M., Kondolf, G. M., Mangel, M., Mohr, M., Moyle, P. B., Nielsen, J., Speed, T. P. and Williams, J. G. 1996. 'Uncertainty and Instream Flow Standards', Fisheries, 21, 20-21.
8. Copp, G. H. 1990. 'Effect of regulation on 0 + fish recruitment in the Great Ouse, a lowland river', Regulated Rivers: Research & Management, 5, 251-263.
9. Copp, G. H. 1992. 'An empirical model for predicting microhabitat of 0 + juvenile fishes in a lowland river catchment', Oecologia, 91, 338-345.
10. Copp, G. H. in press. 'Importance of marinas and off-channel water bodies as refuges for young fishes in a regulated lowland river', Regulated Rivers: Research & Management.
11. Elliott, J. M. 1995. 'The ecological basis for management of fish stocks in rivers', in Harper, D. M. and Ferguson, A. J. D. (Eds), The Ecological Basis for River Management, John Wiley, Chichester, 323-338.
12. Garner, P. 1995. 'Suitability indices for juvenile 0 + roach [Rutilus rutilus (L.)] using point abundance sampling data', Regulated Rivers: Research & Management, 10, 99-104.
13. Garner, P. 1996a. 'Habitat Use by 0 + Fishes in a Regulated River', unpublished PhD thesis, University of Birmingham, Birmingham.
14. Garner, P. 1996b. 'Microhabitat use and diet of 0 + cyprinid fishes in a lentic, regulated reach of the River Great Ouse, UK', Journal of Fish Biology, 48, 367-382.
15. Garner, P., Bass, J. A. B. and Collett, G. D. 1996. 'The effects of weed cutting upon the biota of a large regulated river', Aquatic Conservation, 7, 21-29.
16. Gore, J. A. and Nestler, J. M. (1988) 'Instream flow studies in perspective', Regulated Rivers: Research & Management, 2, 93-101.
17. Gustard, A., Cole, G., Minshall, D. and Bayliss, A. 1987. A Study of Compensation Flows in the United Kingdom, Report no. 99, Institute of Hydrology, Wallingford.
18. Harvey, B. C. 1991. 'Interaction of abiotic and biotic factors influences larval fish survival in an Oklahoma stream', Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 48, 1476-1480.
19. Hearne, J. W. and Armitage, P. D. 1993. 'Implications of the annual macrophyte growth cycle on habitats in rivers', Regulated Rivers: Research & Management, 8, 313-322.
20. Heggenes, J. 1996. 'Habitat selection by brown trout (Salmo trutta) and young Atlantic salmon (S. salar) in streams: Static and dynamic hydraulic modelling', Regulated Rivers: Research & Management, 12, 155-169.
21. Hobbs, N. T. and Hanley, T. A. 1990. 'Habitat evaluation: Do use/availability data reflect carrying capacity?, Journal of Wildlife Management, 54, 515-522.
22. Kaufmann, R. and Weiser, W. 1992. 'Influence of temperature and ambient oxygen on the swimming energetics of cyprinid larvae and juveniles', in Wieser, S., Schiemer, F., Goldschmidt, A. and Kotrschal, K. (Eds), Environmental Biology of European Cyprinids, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 87-96.
23. Leopold, L. B., Wolman, W. G. and Miller, J. P. 1964. Fluvial Processes in Geomorphology, Freeman & Sons, San Francisco.
24. Lightfoot, G. W. and Jones, N. V. 1979. 'The relationship between the size of 0 group roach (Rutilus rutilus (L.)), their swimming capabilities and distribution in a river', Proceedings of the First British Freshwater Fisheries Conference, University of Liverpool, 230-236.
25. Mann, R. H. K. and Bass, J. A. B. 1997. 'The critical water velocities for larval roach (Rutilus rutilus) and dace (Leuciscus leuciscus) and implications for river management', Regulated Rivers: Research & Management, 13, 295-302.
26. Mathur, D., Bason, W. H., Purdy, Jr, E. J. and Silver, C. A. 1985. 'A critique of the instream flow methodology', Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science, 42, 825-831.
27. Milhous, R. T. Updike, M. A. and Schneider, D. M. 1989. Physical Habitat Simulation System Reference Manual -Version II, Instream Flow Information Paper No. 26, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Biological Report, 89(16).
28. Mills, C. A. 1982. 'Factors affecting the survival of dace, Leuciscus leuciscus (L.), in the early post-hatching period', Journal of Fish Biology, 20, 645-655.
29. Milner, N. J., Hemsworth, R. J. and Jones, B. E. 1985. 'Habitat evaluation as a fisheries management tool', Journal of Fish Biology, 27 (Suppl. A), 85-108.
30. NRA 1994. Bedfordshire Ouse (Lower Reaches) Catchment Management Plan Consultation Report, National Rivers Authority, Anglian Region, Peterborough.
31. Orth, D. J. 1987. 'Ecological considerations in the development and application of instream flow-habitat models', Regulated Rivers: Research & Management, 1, 171-181.
32. Pavlov, D. S. 1994. 'The downstream migration of young fishes in rivers: mechanisms and distribution', Folia Zoologica, 43, 193-208.
33. Pearsons, T. D., Li, H. W. and Lambert, G. A. 1992. 'Influence of habitat complexity on resistance to flooding and resilience of stream fish assemblages', Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 121, 427-436.
34. Petts, G. E. 1984. Impounded Rivers, John Wiley, Chichester.
35. Petts, G. E. 1987. 'Ecological management of regulated rivers: A European perspective', Regulated Rivers: Research & Management, 1, 363-369.
36. Petts, G. E., Maddock, I., Bickerton, M. and Ferguson, A. J. D. 1995. 'Linking hydrology and ecology: The scientific basis for river management', in Harper, D. M. and Ferguson, A. J. D. (Eds), The Ecological Basis for River Management, John Wiley, Chichester.
37. Rahel, F. J. 1990. 'The hierarchical nature of community persistence: a problem of scale', American Naturalist, 136, 328-344.
38. Shirvel, C. S. 1989. 'Ability of PHABSIM to predict chinook salmon spawning habitat', Regulated Rivers: Research & Management, 3, 277-289.
39. Snyder, D. E. 1990. 'Fish larvae - Ecologically distinct organisms', US Fish & Wildlife Service Biological Report, 90, 20-23.
40. Summers, D. 1973. The Great Ouse, The History of A River Navigation, David and Charles, Newton Abbot.
41. Zalewski, M. Puchalski, W., Frankiewicz, P. and Bis, B. 1994. 'Riparian ecotones and fish communities in rivers -intermediate complexity hypothesis', in Cowx, I. G. (Ed.), Rehabilitation of Freshwater Fisheries, Fishing News Books, Oxford, 152-160.