Cytometric features of cell nuclei of adenocarcinoma in situ and invasive adenocarcinoma of the cervix

American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 187, Issue 6, 2002, Pages 1566-1573

  West, Loyd A ^a   Swartz, Richard ^b   Cox, Dennis ^b   Boiko, Iouri V ^d   Malpica, Anais ^a   MacAulay, Calum ^e   Follen, Michele ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER   (United States)

^b Rice University   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER AT SAN ANTONIO   (United States)

^d Mays Cancer Center at UT Health San Antonio   (United States)

^e NONE

Author keywords

Adenocarcinoma; Carcinoma in situ; Cervix uteri; Image cytometry

Indexed keywords

ADENOCARCINOMA; ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER INVASION; CARCINOMA IN SITU; CELL NUCLEUS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CYTOMETRY; FEMALE; HISTOMETRY; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; HUMAN TISSUE; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MENSTRUAL CYCLE; MORPHOMETRICS; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS OF COVARIANCE; OPTICS; PATHOLOGICAL ANATOMY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; UTERINE CERVIX CANCER; UTERINE CERVIX EPITHELIUM;

EID: 0036914679     PISSN: 00029378     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1067/mob.2002.127906     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Hepler T, Dockerty M, Randall L. Primary adenocarcinoma of the cervix. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1952;63:800-8.
2. Friedell G, McKay D. Adenocarcinoma in situ of the endocervix. Cancer 1953;6:887-97.
3. Weisbrot I, Stabinski C, Davis A. Adenocarcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix. Cancer 1972;29:1179-87.
4. Christopherson WM, Nelson N, Gray LA. Noninvasive precursor lesions of adenocarcinoma and mixed adenosquamous carcinoma of the cervix uteri. Cancer 1979;44:975-83.
5. Peters RK, Chao A, Mack TM, Thomas D, Berstein L, Henderson BE. Increased frequency of adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix in young women in Los Angeles County. J Natl Cancer Inst 1986;76:423-8.
6. Boon ME, Baak JPA, Kurver PJH, Overdiep SH, Verdonk GW. Adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix: An underdiagnosed lesion. Cancer 1981;48:768-73.
7. Lee KR, Minter LJ, Granter S. Papanicolaou smear sensitivity for adenocarcinoma in situ of cervix: A study of 34 cases. Anal Cell Pathol 1997;107:30-5.
8. Drescher CW, Hopkins MP, Roberts JA. Comparison of the pattern of metastatic spread of sqnamous cell cancer and adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix. Gynecol Oncol 1989;33:340-3.
9. Eifel PJ, Burke TW, Morris M, Smith TL. Adenocarcinoma as an independent risk factor for disease recurrence in patients with stage IB cervical carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 1995;59:38-44.
10. Im DD, Duska LR, Rosenshein ND. Adequacy of conization margins in adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix as a predictor of residual disease. Gynecol Oncol 1995;59:179-82.
11. Krumins I, Young Q, Pacey F, Bousfield L, Mulhearn L. The cytologic diagnosis of adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix uteri. Acta Cytol 1977;21:320-9.
12. Bousfield L, Pacey F, Young Q, Krumins I, Osborn R. The expanded cytologic criteria for the diagnosis of adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix and related lesions. Acta Cytol 1980;24: 283-96.
13. Ayer B, Pacey F, Greenberg M, Bousfield L. The cytologic diagnosis of adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix uteri and related lesions. Acta Cytol 1987;31:397-411.
14. Ballo MS, Siverberg SG, Sidaway MK. Cytologic features of well-differentiated villoglandular adenocarcinoma of the cervix. Acta Cytol 1996;40:536-40.
15. Doudkine A, MacAulay C, Poulin N, Palcic B. Nuclear texture measurements in image cytometry. Pathologica 1995;87:986-99.
16. Partington CK, Sincouk AM, Steele SJ. Quantitative determination of acid-labile DNA in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Cancer 1991;67:3104-9.
17. Mitchell ME Hittelman WN, Hong WK, Lotan R, Schottenfeld D. The natural history of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: An argument for intermediate endpoint biomarkers. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1994;3:619-26.
18. MacAulay C, Lam S, Payne PW, LeRiche JC, Palcic B. Malignancy-associated changes in bronchial epithelial cells in biopsy specimens. Anal Quant Cytol Histol 1995;17:55-61.
19. Boiko IV, Mitchell MF, Pandey DK, White RA, Hu W, Malpica A, et al. DNA image cytometric measurement as a surrogate endpoint biomarker in a phase I trial of α-difluoromethylornithine for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1997;6:849-55.
20. Poulin N, Boiko I, MacAulay C, Boone C, Nishioka K, Hittelman W, et al. Nuclear morphometry as an intermediate endpoint biomarker in chemoprevention of cervical carcinoma using α-difluoromethylornithine. Cytometry 1999;38:214-23.
21. Agorastos T, Andromache V, Papaloucas A. Minimal deviation adenocarcinoma of the cervix: A hypodiploid tumor? Int J Gynecol Pathol 1994;13:211-9.
22. Biesterfeld S, Reus K, Bayer-Pietsch E, Mihalcea AM, Böcking A. DNA image cytometry in the differential diagnosis of endocervical adenocarcinoma. Cancer (Cancer Cytopathol) 2001;93:160-4.
23. Gloor E, Ruaicka J. Morphology of adenocarcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix: A study of 14 cases. Cancer 1982;49:294-302.
24. van-Aspert-van-Erp AJM, van't Hof-Grootenboer BE, Brugal G, Vooijs GP. Identifying cytologic characteristics and grading endocervical columnar cell abnormalities: A study aided by high-definition television. Acta Cytol 1997;41:1659-70.
25. Van Roon E, Boon ME, Kurver PJH, Baak JPA. The association between precancerous-columnar and squamous lesions of the cervix: A morphometric study. Histopathology 1983;7:887-96.
26. Wolf JK, Levenback C, Malpica A, Morris M, Burke R, Mitchell ME Adenocarcinoma in sire of the cervix: Significance of cone biopsy margins. Obstet Gynecol 1996;88:82-6.
27. Baak JPA, Noteboom E, Koevoets JJM. The influence of fixative and other variations in tissue processing on nuclear morphometric features. Anal Quant Cytol Histol 1989;11:219-24.
28. Böcking A, Auffermann W, Vogel H, Schlöndorff, Goebbels F. Diagnosis and grading of malignancy in squamous epithelial lesions of the larynx with DNA cytophotometry. Cancer 1985; 56:1600-4.
29. Gschwendtner A, Kreczy A. DNA cytometry: Diploid standard and section thickness. Am J Clin Pathol 1994;102:558-9.
30. Gschwendtner A, Mairinger T. How thick is your section? The influence of section thickness on DNA-cytometry on histological sections. Anal Cell Pathol 1995;9:29-37.
31. Xin X, Sudbi J, Boysen M, Reith A. Caveats in the use of paraffin sections for DNA assessment in nuclei as demonstrated by confocal laser scanning microscopy. Anal Quant Cytol Histol 1996; 18:104.
32. Neter J, Kutner M, Nachtsheim C, Wasserman W. Applied Linear Statistical Models. 4th Ed. Chicago: Irwin; 1996.
33. Larsen LE, Walter DO, McNew JJ, Adey WR. On the problem of bias in error rate estimation for discriminant analysis. Pattern Recognition 1971;3:217-23.
34. Raudys SJ, Jain AK. Small sample size effects in statistical pattern recognition: Recommendations for practitioners. IEEE Trans Pattern Analysis Machine Intell 1991;3:252-64.
35. Schulerud H, Kristensen G, Liestøl K, Vlatkovic L, Reith A, Albregtsen F, et al. A review of caveats in statistical nuclear image analysis. Anal Cell Pathol 1998;16:63-82.
36. SAS Institute Inc. SAS/STAT Software: Changes and Enhancements through Release 6.12. Cary (NC): SAS Institute; 1997.
37. Verbeke G, Molenberghs G, editors. Linear Mixed Models in Practice, a SAS Oriented Approach. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1997.
38. Searle S. Linear Models for Unbalanced Data. New York: John Wiley; 1987.
39. Hochberg Y, Benjamini Y. More powerful procedures for multiple significance testing? Stat Med 1990;9:811-8.
40. Scheffe H. The Analysis of Variance. New York: John Wiley; 1959.
41. MacAulay C, Palcic B. Fractal texture features based on optical density surface area: Use in image analysis of cervical cells. Anal Quant Cytol Histol 1990;12:394-8.