The unfinished gender revolution

Educational Leadership

Volumn 60, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 59-63

  Zittleman, Karen ^a   Sadker, David ^a  

^a AMERICAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036902445     PISSN: 00131784     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Davis, A., & McDaniel, T. (1999). You've come a long way, baby-or have you? Research evaluating gender portrayal in recent Caldecott-winning books. Reading Teacher, 52, 532-536.
2. Evans, L., & Davies, K. (2000). No sissy boys here: A content analysis of the representation of masculinity in elementary school reading textbooks. Sex Roles, 42, 255-270.
3. Gates, A. (1961). Sex differences in reading ability. Elementary School Journal, 61, 431-434.
4. Rowe, M.B. (1978). Teaching science as continuous inquiry. (2nd ed.) New York: McGraw-Hill.
5. Sadker, M., & Sadker, D. (1980). Sexism in teacher education texts. Harvard Educational Review, 50, 36-46.
6. Sadker, M., & Sadker, D. (1995). Failing at fairness: How America's schools cheat girls. New York: Touchstone Press.
7. U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2002). Digest of education statistics, 2001. Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
8. U.S. Department of Education, Office for Civil Rights. (1999). Elementary and secondary school compliance reports. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
9. Witt, S. (1996). Traditional or androgynous: An analysis to determine gender role orientation of basal readers. Child Study Journal, 26, 303-318.