Nucleomorphs: Enslaved algal nuclei

Current Opinion in Microbiology

Volumn 5, Issue 6, 2002, Pages 612-619

  Cavalier Smith, T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGAL PROTEIN;

ALGA; ALGAL GENETICS; BIOGENESIS; CELL MEMBRANE; CELL NUCLEUS; CELL ORGANELLE; CELL SIZE; CELL VOLUME; CHIMERA; CHLOROPLAST; EUKARYOTE EVOLUTION; EUKARYOTIC CELL; FLAGELLATE; GENE SEQUENCE; GENE TRANSFER; GENOME ANALYSIS; GREEN ALGA; INTRON; MOLECULAR PHYLOGENY; NONHUMAN; RED ALGA; REGNUM; REVIEW; SYMBIOSIS;

ALGAE; CHLOROPHYTA; CHROMISTA; CRYPTOPHYTA; EUKARYOTA; MASTIGOPHORA (FLAGELLATES); PROTOZOA; RHODOPHYTA;

EID: 0036897998     PISSN: 13695274     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1369-5274(02)00373-9     Document Type: Review

References (51)

1. Maier UG, Douglas SE, Cavalier-Smith T: The nucleomorph genomes of cryptophytes and chlorarachniophytes. Protist 2000, 151:103-109.
2. Cavalier-Smith T: Membrane heredity, symbiogenesis, and the multiple origins of algae. In Biodiversity and Evolution. Edited by Arai R, Kato M, Doi Y. Tokyo: The National Science Museum Foundation; 1995:75-114.
3. Cavalier-Smith T: Membrane heredity and early chloroplast evolution. Trends Plant Sci 2000, 5:174-182. This paper explains the concepts of membrane heredity and genetic membranes, with special reference to the origin of chloroplasts and their lateral transfer during secondary symbiogenesis to form the more complex cells of chromalveolate and cabozoan algae.
4. Cavalier-Smith T: A revised six-kingdom system of life. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 1998, 73:203-266.
5. Douglas S, Zauner S, Fraunholz M, Beaton M, Penny S, Deng LT, Wu X, Reith M, Cavalier-Smith T, Maier UG: The highly reduced genome of an enslaved algal nucleus. Nature 2001, 410:1091-1096. This paper presents the first full DNA sequence of a nucleomorph genome (that of the cryptomonad G. theta), the smallest nuclear genome completely sequenced. It shows that most nucleomorph genes are genetic housekeeping genes that are needed only to enable the expression of the 30 nucleomorph-encoded chloroplast protein genes and a handful of other end-product genes, notably a few transporter proteins.
6. Moestrup Ø, Sengco M: Ultrastuctural studies on Bigelowiella natans, gen. et sp. nov., a chlorarachniophyte flagellate. J Phycol 2001, 37:624-646. This paper reports the first ultrastructural study of Bigelowiella natans, the previously unnamed chlorarachnean flagellate on which molecular studies have concentrated (see, for example, [14,16-18]).
7. Gilson PR, McFadden GI: Jam packed genomes - Preliminary, comparative analysis of nucleomorphs. Genetica 2002, 115:13-28.
8. Cavalier-Smith T: Principles of protein and lipid targeting in secondary symbiogenesis: Euglenoid, dinofiagellate, and sporozoan plastid origins and the eukaryote family tree. J Euk Microbiol 1999, 46:347-366.
9. van Dooren GG, Schwartzbach SD, Osafune T, McFadden GI: Translocation of proteins across the multiple membranes of complex plastids. Biochim Biophys Acta 2001, 1541:34-53. This is an excellent review of protein targeting and import into chromalveolate and cabozoan chloroplasts. The term 'complex plastids', however, is misleading (except, perhaps, for dinoflagellates and euglenoids, which have triple chloroplast envelopes), because in chromists, Sporozoa and chlorarachneans, the two additional membranes (the periplastid membrane and either the epiplastid membrane or the perichloroplast rough ER) are neither evolutionarily nor cytologically chloroplast envelope membranes, but entirely distinct, additional structures that are not part of the chloroplasts themselves.
10. Keeling PJ, Deane JA, Hink-Schauer C, Douglas SE, Maier UG, McFadden GI: The secondary endosymbiont of the cryptomonad Guillardia theta contains alpha-, beta-, and gamma-tubulin genes. Mol Biol Evol 1999, 16:1308-1313.
11. Zauner S, Fraunholz M, Wastl J, Penny S, Beaton M, Cavalier-Smith T, Maier UG, Douglas S: Chloroplast protein and centrosomal genes, a tRNA intron, and odd telomeres in an unusually compact eukaryotic genome, the cryptomonad nucleomorph. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000, 97:200-205. Together with [5], this paper provides evidence for several centrosomal proteins encoded by the cryptomonad nucleomorph, making it highly probable that it divides mitotically. This is even though the authors of [12,13] could not detect microtubules ultrastructurally within dividing nuclei, in which the envelope does not break down (that is, nucleomorphs probably use closed mitosis like some red algae). This paper shows that the telomere sequences are less typical than in chlorarachnean nucleomorphs.
12. Morrall S, Greenwood AD: Ultrastructure of nucleomorph division in species of Cryptophyceae and its evolutionary implications. J Cell Sci 1982, 54:311-328.
13. Meyer S: The taxonomic implications of the ultrastructure and cell division of a stigma-containing Chroomonas sp. (Cryptophyceae) from Rocky Bay, Natal, South Africa. S Afr J Bot 1987, 53:129-139.
14. Keeling PJ, Deane JA, McFadden GI: The phylogenetic position of alpha- and beta-tubulins from the Chlorarachnion host and Cercomonas (Cercozoa). J Eukaryot Microbiol 1998, 45:561-570.
15. Wastl J, Maier UG: Transport of proteins into cryptomonads complex plastids. J Biol Chem 2000, 275:23194-23198. This paper shows that a nucleomorph-encoded chloroplast preprotein can be imported in vitro into purified cryptomonad and flowering plant chloroplasts, but a nuclear-encoded cryptomonad preprotein cannot. It implies that the import machinery for the latter may differ from the conserved Tic/Toc machinery that imports nucleomorph-encoded plastid proteins.
16. Gilson PR, McFadden GI: The miniaturized nuclear genome of eukaryotic endosymbiont contains genes that overlap, genes that are cotranscribed, and the smallest known spliceosomal introns. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1996, 93:7737-7742.
17. Gilson PR, McFadden GI: Good things in small packages: The tiny genomes of chlorarachniophyte endosymbionts. Bioessays 1997, 19:167-173.
18. Gilson P, McFadden GI: The chlorarachniophyte: A cell with two different nuclei and two different telomeres. Chromosoma 1995, 103:635-641.
19. Cavalier-Smith T, Beaton MJ: The skeletal function of non-genic nuclear DNA: New evidence from ancient cell chimaeras. Genetica 1999, 106:3-13.
20. Cavalier-Smith T: Selfish DNA and the origin of introns. Nature 1985, 315:283-284.
21. Beaton MJ, Cavalier-Smith T: Eukaryotic non-coding DNA is functional: Evidence from the differential scaling of cryptomonad genomes. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B 1999, 266:2053-2059.
22. Gregory TR: Coincidence, coevolution, or causation? DNA content, cell size, and the C-value enigma. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 2001, 76:65-101.
23. Cavalier-Smith T: Cell volume and the evolution of eukaryotic genome size. In The Evolution of Genome Size. Edited by Cavalier-Smith T. Chichester; Wiley 1985: 105-184.
24. Deane JA, Fraunholz M, Su V, Maier UG, Martin W, Durnford DG, McFadden GI: Evidence for nucleomorph to host nucleus gene transfer: light-harvesting complex proteins from cryptomonads and chlorarachniophytes. Protist 2000, 151:239-252. It had long been deduced that hundreds, possibly thousands, of genes must have been transferred from nucleomorphs into the host nucleus. The light-harvesting complex (LHC) proteins are the first well-studied example. The bipartite cryptomonad targeting sequences are more similar to those of heterokonts than alveolates, supporting chromist monophyly. This study provides the first evidence for bipartite targeting sequences in chlorarachneans and suggests that their LHC protein is more similar to that of Tetraselmis than those of higher plants, corroborating other evidence that both chlorarachnean and euglenoid plastids came from a green alga belonging to the infraphylum Tetraphytae, which includes Tetraselmis, Ulvophyceae, Trebouxiophyceae and Chlorophyceae [4].
25. Stibitz TB, Keeling PJ, Bhattacharya D: Symbiotic origin of a novel actin gene in the cryptophyte Pyrenomonas helgolandii. Mol Biol Evol 2000, 17:1731-1738. This paper shows that secondary symbiogenesis, like primary symbiogenesis, can incidentally contribute genes to the host that are not directly related to the primary novel function (photosynthesis) provided by the secondary symbiont.
26. Dacks JB, Marinets A, Doolittle WF, Cavalier-Smith T, Logsdon JM: Analyses of RNA Polymerase II genes from free-living protists: Phylogeny, long branch attraction, and the eukaryotic big bang. Mol Biol Evol 2002, 19:830-840.
27. Archibald JM, Cavalier-Smith T, Maier U, Douglas S: Molecular chaperones encoded by a reduced nucleus: The cryptomonad nucleomorph. J Mol Evol 2001, 52:490-501.
28. Cavalier-Smith T: The kingdom Chromista: In The Chromophyte Algae: Problems and Perspectives. Green JC, Leadbeater BSC, Diver WC. Oxford University Press; 1989: 381-407.
29. Cavalier-Smith T: The kingdom Chromista: Origin and systematics. In Progress in Phycological Research, vol 4. Edited by Round FE, Chapman DJ. Bristol: Biopress; 1986: 309-347.
30. Andersson JO, Roger AJ: A cyanobacterial gene in nonphotosynthetic protists - An early chloroplast acquisition in eukaryotes? Curr Biol 2002, 12:115-119. The presence of a cyanobacterium-/plastid-related gene (gnd) for 6-phosphogluconate dehydrogenase (the second enzyme in the oxidative pentose phosphate pathway) shows that Percolozoa and oomycetes arose from algal ancestors, as argued by the cabozoan and chromalveolate theories, respectively. Although the trypanosome gnd gene is so divergent that its ancestry is unclear, the simplest view is that it was present in a common photosynthetic ancestor of all discicristate protozoa; even the more divergent gnd genes of Metamonada might have come from a common ancestral photosynthetic excavate [43•]. Although these data imply that plastids were present much earlier in excavate evolution than often assumed, they do not distinguish between acquisition of the gnd gene by secondary symbiogenesis (the cabozoan theory) and the less parsimonious idea that the primary origin of chloroplasts took place in a common ancestor of plants and excavates such as discicristates.
31. Cavalier Smith T, Chao EE, Allsopp MTEP: Ribosomal RNA evidence for chloroplast loss within Heterokonta: Pedinellid relationships and a revised classification of ochristan algae. Archiv Protistenk 1995, 145:209-220.
32. Sekiguchi H, Moriya M, Nakayama T, Inouye I: Vestigial chloroplasts in heterotrophic stramenopiles Pteridomonas danica and Ciliophrys infusionum (Dictyochophyceae). Protist 2002, 153:157-167.
33. Zhang Z, Green BR, Cavalier-Smith T: Single gene circles in dinoflagellate chloroplast genomes. Nature 1999, 400:155-159.
34. Zhang Z, Green BR, Cavalier-Smith T: Phylogeny of ultra-rapidly evolving dinoflagellate chloroplast genes: A possible common origin for sporozoan and dinoflagellate plastids. J Mol Evol 2000, 51:26-40. Together with [33], this paper provided the first molecular sequence trees supporting a red algal origin and chromistan affinities for dinoflagellate chloroplasts. These were the first sequence trees to suggest a common origin for sporozoan and dinoflagellate chloroplasts.
35. Blanchard JL, Hicks JS: The non-photosynthetic plastid in malarial parasites and other apicomplexans is derived from outside the green plastid lineage. J Eukaryot Microbiol 1999, 46:367-375.
36. Kohler S, Delwiche CF, Denny PW, Tilney LG, Webster P, Wilson RJ, Palmer JD, Roos DS: A plastid of probable green algal origin in Apicomplexan parasites. Science 1997, 275:1485-1489.
37. Fast NM, Kissinger JC, Roos DS, Keeling PJ: Nuclear-encoded, plastid-targeted genes suggest a single common origin for apicomplexan and dinoflagellate plastids. Mol Biol Evol 2001, 18:418-426. This paper provides the strongest evidence yet for chromalvealate monophyly and their common ancestral origin by a single symbiogenetic enslavement of a red alga. The red algal plastid glyceraldehyde phosphate dehydrogenase has been replaced in chromalveolates by a duplicate of the cytosolic version that acquired bipartite amino-terminal targeting sequences for import into plastids from the cytosol. This version is clearly related to the cytosolic one of ciliates, alveolates that, before the chromalveolate theory, had been assumed not to have had a photosynthetic ancestor. It is highly improbable that an identical gene duplication, retargeting and gene replacement occurred independently in all four major chromalveolate groups (cryptomonads, chromobiotes, dinoflagellates and Sporozoa), as theories of separate secondary origins of each plastid type must assume.
38. Ishida K, Green BR: Second- and third-hand chloroplasts in dinoflagellates: Phylogeny of oxygen-evolving enhancer 1 (PsbO) protein reveals replacement of a nuclear-encoded plastid gene by that of a haptophyte tertiary endosymbiont. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002, 99:9294-9299.
39. Tengs T, Dahlberg OJ, Shalchian-Tabrizi K, Klaveness D, Rudi K, Delwiche CF, Jakobsen KS: Phylogenetic analyses indicate that the 19'Hexanoyloxy-fucoxanthin-containing dinoflagellates have tertiary plastids of haptophyte origin. Mol Biol Evol 2000, 17:718-729.
40. Joiner KA, Roos DS: Secretory traffic in the eukaryotic parasite Toxoplasma gondii: Less is more. J Cell Biol 2002, 157:557-563.
41. Saldarriaga JF, Taylor FJ, Keeling PJ, Cavalier-Smith T: Dinoflagellate nuclear SSU rRNA phylogeny suggests multiple plastid losses and replacements. J Mol Evol 2001, 53:204-213.
42. Glockner G, Rosenthal A, Valentin K: The structure and gene repertoire of an ancient red algal plastid genome. J Mol Evol 2000, 51:382-390. This paper shows unique features of the Cyanidium chloroplast genome that are not shared with that of other red algae or chromalveolates. It supports the idea that Cyanidiophyceae should be a distinct red algal class and that the primary divergence within red algae was between them and the other unicellular class, Rhodellophyceae [4]. It also indicates that the red alga enslaved by the ancestral chromalveolate to form the cryptomonad nucleomorph and periplastid membrane was not derived from a cyanidiophyte, but from a more typical rhodellophyte red alga.
43. Cavalier-Smith T: The phagotrophic origin of eukaryotes and phylogenetic classification of Protozoa. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2002, 52:297-354. This paper revises the phagotrophy theory of the origin of eukaryotes in the light of evidence that no extant eukaryotes are primitively amitochondrial. It revises protozoan higher classification, formally establishing the new infrakingdoms Rhizaria and Excavata, and expanding the phylum Cercozoa (to which Chlorarachnea belong) by including the parasitic Ascetosporea. It names the ancestrally biciliate bikont clade, which includes plants, chromaIveolates, excavates and Rhizaria, arguing that their complex ciliary transformation indicates that they are derived compared with the putatively primitively uniciliate Amoebozoa and opisthokonts.
44. Keeling PJ: Foraminifera and Cercozoa are related in actin phylogeny: Two orphans find a home? Mol Biol Evol 2001, 18:1551-1557.
45. Sulli C, Fang Z, Muchhal U, Schwartzbach SD: Topology of Euglena chloroplast protein precursors within endoplasmic reticulum to Golgi to chloroplast transport vesicles. J Biol Chem 1999, 274:457-463.
46. Ishida K, Green BR, Cavalier-Smith T: Diversification of a chimaeric algal group, the chlorarachniophytes: Phylogeny of nuclear and nucleomorph small subunit rRNA genes. Mol Biol Evol 1999, 16:321-331.
47. Ishida K, Cavalier-Smith T, Green BR: Endomembrane structure and the chloroplast protein targeting pathway in Heterosigma akashiwo (Raphidophyceae, Chromista). J Phycol 2000, 36:1135-1144.
48. Mullner AN, Angeler DG, Samuel R, Linton EW, Triemer RE: Phylogenetic analysis of phagotrophic, photomorphic and osmotrophic euglenoids by using the nuclear 18S rDNA sequence. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2001, 51:783-791.
49. Cavalier-Smith T: Chloroplast evolution: Secondary symbiogenesis and multiple losses. Curr Biol 2002, 12:R62-64.
50. Stechmann A, Cavalier-Smith T: Rooting the eukaryote tree by using a derived gene fusion. Science 2002, 297:89-91. This paper shows that a secondarily derived gene fusion between dihydrofolate reductase and thymidylate synthetase (TS) is present in all bikont eukaryotes so far studied. If this gene fusion has never been reversed, the eukaryotic root must lie between bikonts (plants, chromalveolates, cabozoa, Heliozoa and Apusozoa) and opisthokonts (animals, choanozoan protozoa and fungi), which lack the fusion. The position of Amoebozoa with respect to the root remains ambiguous because it is unknown whether TS genes arnplified from them are truly separate or part of a fusion gene that simply would not amplify. As previous deductions of the position of the root using outgroup rooting of sequence trees were flawed by long-branch artefacts, this is the strongest available evidence regarding its true position.
51. Silberman JD, Simpson AG, Kulda J, Cepicka I, Hampl V, Johnson PJ, Roger AJ: Retortamonad flagellates are closely related to diplomonads - Implications for the history of mitochondrial function in eukaryote evolution. Mol Biol Evol 2002, 19:777-786. This paper provides the first rRNA sequence evidence for the position of retortamonads, showing that they are either sisters of or derived from diplomonads. This supports the monophyly of the protozoan superclass Eopharyngia (diplomonads plus retortamonads) [4] and means that, like all other established groups of amitochondrial eukaryotes, they must be secondarily amitochondrial. Thus, no amitochondrial eukaryotes are primitive.