Effective multidimensional resistivity inversion using finite-element techniques

Geophysical Journal International

Volumn 151, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 710-728

  Pain, Christopher C ^a   Herwanger, Jörg V ^a   Worthington, Michael H ^a   De Oliveira, Cassiano R E ^a  

^a IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Constrained inversion; Domain decomposition; Electrical conductivity; Finite element methods; Four pole data; Model covariance matrices; Pole pole data

Indexed keywords

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY; ELECTRICAL RESISTIVITY; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; GEOPHYSICS; INVERSE PROBLEM;

EID: 0036897576     PISSN: 0956540X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-246X.2002.01786.x     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Adams, L., 1983. An m-step pre-conditioned conjugate gradient method for parallel computations, in IEEE Parallel Computation Conference Proceedings, pp. 36-43, IEEE, Bellaire, MI.
2. Allaud, L. & Martin M., 1977. Schlumberger, the History of a Technique, Wiley, New York.
3. Beard, L.P., Hohmann, G.W. & Tripp, A., 1996. Fast resistivity/IP inversion using a low-contrast approximation, Geophysics. 61, 169-179.
4. Binley, A., Shaw, B. & Henry-Poulter, S., 1996. Flow pathways in porous media: electrical resistance tomography and dye staining image verification, Meas. Sci. Technol., 7, 384-390.
5. Bishop, C.M., 1995. Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
6. Biswas, D. & Bhattacharya, B.B., 1998. 2-D electrical modeling over undulated topography, Geophysics, 63, 898-907.
7. Cheney, M., Isaacson, D. & Newell, J.C., 1999. Electrical impedance tomography, SIAM Rev., 41, 85-101.
8. Constable, S.C., Parker, R.L. & Constable, C.G., 1987. Occam's inversion: a practical algorithm for generating smooth models from electromagnetic data, Geophysics, 52, 289-300.
9. Daily, W., Ramirez, A., LaBreque, D. & Nitao, J., 1992. Electrical resistivity tomography of vadose water movement, Water Resources Res., 28, 1429-1442.
10. Dey, A. & Morrison, H.F., 1979a. Resistivity modeling for arbitrarily shaped two-dimensional structures, Geophys. Prospect., 27, 106-136.
11. Dey, A. & Morrison, H.F., 1979b. Resistivity modeling for arbitrarily shaped three-dimensional structures, Geophysics, 44, 753-780.
12. Ellis, R.G. & Oldenburg, D.W., 1994. The pole-pole 3-D DC-resistivity inverse problem: a conjugate-gradient approach, Geophys. J. Int., 119, 187-194.
13. Fox, R.C., Hohmann, G.W., Hohmann, J.K.T. & Rijo, L., 1980. Topographic effects in resistivity and induced-polarization surveys, Geophysics, 45, 75-93.
14. Golub, G. & Van Loan, C., 1996. Matrix Computations, 3rd edn, Johns Hopkins University Press, London.
15. Herwanger, J., 2001. Seismic and electric crosshole tomography for fracture detection and characterization. PhD thesis. Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, London.
16. LaBreque, D.J., Miletto, M., Daily, W., Ramirez, A. & Owen E., 1996. The effects of noise on Occam's inversion of resistivity tomography data, Geophysics. 61, 538-548.
17. Li, Y. & Oldenburg, D.W., 1994. Inversion of 3-d DC resistivity data using approximate inverse mapping, Geophys. J. Int., 116, 527-537.
18. Li, Y. & Oldenburg, D.W., 1996. 3-d inversion of magnetic data, Geophysics. 61, 394-408.
19. Loke, M. & Barker, R., 1996. Practical techniques for 3-D resistivity surveys and data inversion, Geophys. Prospect., 44, 499-523.
20. Pain, C.C., de Oliveira, C.R.E. & Goddard, A.J.H., 1999. A neural network graph partitioning procedure for grid-based domain decomposition, Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., 44, 593-613.
21. Park, S.K. & Van, G.P., 1991. Inversion of pole-pole data for 3-D resistivity structure beneath arrays of electrodes, Geophysics, 56, 951-960.
22. Pelton, W.H., Rijo, L. & Swift, C.M., 1978. Inversion of two-dimensional resistivity and induced-polarization data, Geophysics, 43, 788-803.
23. Shima, H., 1992. 2-D and 3-D resistivity image reconstruction using crosshole data. Geophysics. 57, 1270-1281.
24. Smith, N. & Vozoff, K., 1984. Two-dimensional DC resistivity inversion for dipole-dipole data, IEEE Trans. Geosci, Remote Sensing. GE-22, 21-28.
25. Spitzer, K., 1995. A 3-D finite-difference algorithm for DC resistivity modelling using conjugate gradient methods, Geophys. J. Int., 123, 903-914.
26. Sugimoto, Y., 1999. Shallow high-resolution 2-D and 3-D electrical crosshole imaging. Leading Edge, 12, 1425-1428.
27. Telford, W., Geldart, L. & Sheriff, R., 1990. Applied Geophysics, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
28. Tripp, A.C. Hohmann, G.E. & Swift, C., 1984. Two-dimensional resistivity inversion, Geophysics, 49, 1708-1717.
29. Weller, A., Gruhne, M., Seichter, M., & Börner, F.D., 1996a. Monitoring hydraulic experiments by complex conductivity tomography, Eur. J. Environ. Eng. Geophys., 1, 209-228.
30. Weller, A., Seichter, M. & Kampke, A., 1996b. Induced-polarization modelling using complex electrical conductivities, Geophys. J. Int. 127, 387-398.
31. Zhang, J., Mackie, R.L. & Madden, T.R., 1995. 3-D resistivity forward modelling and inversion using conjugate gradients. Geophysics, 60, 1313-1325.
32. Zhao, S. & Yedlin, M.J., 1996. Multidomain Chebyshev spectral method for 3-D DC resistivity modeling, Geophysics, 61, 1616-1623.
33. Zienkiewicz, O. & Taylor, R., 1991. Finite Element Method: Solid and Fluid Mechanics Dynamics and Non-Linearity, 4th edn. Vol. 2, McGraw-Hill, New York.
34. Zienkiewicz, O.C., & Morgan, K., 1983. Finite Elements and Approximation, Wiley, New York.