Multidomain Chebyshev spectral method for 3-D dc resistivity modeling

Geophysics

Volumn 61, Issue 6, 1996, Pages 1616-1623

  Zhao, Shengkai ^a,b   Yedlin, Matthew J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b BAKER HUGHES   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BOUNDARY CONDITIONS; CHEBYSHEV APPROXIMATION; ELECTRIC CONDUCTIVITY OF SOLIDS; ELECTRIC CURRENTS; ELECTRIC PROSPECTING; FINITE DIFFERENCE METHOD; FUNCTIONS; INTERFACES (MATERIALS); MATHEMATICAL MODELS; POLYNOMIALS;

CHEBYSHEV POLYNOMIALS; MULTIDOMAIN CHEBYSHEV SPECTRAL METHOD; POTENTIAL FUNCTIONS;

GEOPHYSICS;

MULTIDOMAIN CHEBYSHEV SPECTRAL METHOD; RESISTIVITY;

EID: 0030292090     PISSN: 00168033     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1190/1.1444080     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Alfano, L., 1959, Introduction to the interpretation of resistivity measurements for complicated structural conditions: Geophys. Prosp., 7, 311-366.
2. Bibby, H. M., 1978, Direct-current resistivity modeling for axially symmetric bodies using the finite-element method: Geophysics, 43, 550-562.
3. Buzbee, B. L., Dorr, F. W., George, J. A., and Golub, G. H., 1971, The direct solution of the discrete Poisson equation on irregular regions: SIAM J. on Numerical Analysis; 8, 722-736.
4. Canuto, C., Hussaini, M. Y., Quarteroni, A., and Zang, T. A., 1988, Spectral methods in fluid dynamics: Springer-Verlag, New York.
5. Coggon, J. H., 1971, Electromagnetic and electrical modeling by the finite-element method: Geophysics, 36, 132-155.
6. Daniels, J. J., 1977. Three-dimensional resistivity and induced polarization modeling using buried electrodes: Geophysics, 42, 1006-1019.
7. Dey, A., and Morrison, H. F., 1979a, Resistivity modeling for arbitrarily shaped two-dimensional structures: Geophys. Prosp., 27, 106-136.
8. _ 1979b, Resistivity modeling for arbitrarily shaped three-dimensional structures: Geophysics, 44, 753-780.
9. Dieter, K., Paterson, N. R., and Grant, F. S., 1969, IP and resistivity type curves for three-dimensional bodies: Geophysics, 34, 615-632.
10. Eskola, L., Soininen, H., and Oksama, M., 1989, Modeling of resistivity and IP anomalies of a thin conductor with an integral equation: Geoexpl., 26, 95-104.
11. Fox, R. C., Hohmann, G. W., Killpack, T. J., and Rijo, L., 1980, Topographic effects in resistivity and induced-polarization surveys: Geophysics, 45, 75-93.
12. Gottlieb, D., and Orszag, S. A., 1977, Numerical analysis of spectral methods: Theory and Applications: SIAM-CBMS.
13. Gottlieb, D., Hussaini, M. Y., and Orszag, S. A., 1984, Theory and applications of spectral methods, in Voigt, R. G., Gottlieb, D., and Hussaini, M. Y., Eds., Spectral methods for partial differential equations: SIAM-CBMS.
14. Grant, F. S., and West, G. F., 1965, Interpretation theory in applied geophysics: McGraw-Hill Book Co.
15. Hohmann, G. W., 1975, Three-dimensional induced polarization and electromagnetic modeling: Geophysics, 40, 309-324.
16. Holcombe, H. T. and Jiracek, G. R., 1984, Three-dimensional terrain corrections in resistivity surveys: Geophysics, 49, 439-452.
17. James, B. A., 1985, Efficient microcomputer-based, finite-difference resistivity modeling via Polozhii decomposition: Geophysics, 50, 443-465.
18. Keller, G. V., and Frischknecht, F. C., 1966, Electrical methods in geophysical prospecting: Pergamon Press.
19. Lee, T., 1975, An integral equation and its solution for some two- and three-dimensional problems in resistivity and induced polarization: Geophys. J. Roy. Astr. Soc., 42, 81-95.
20. Lowry, T., Allen, M. B., and Shive, P. N., 1989, Singularity removal: A refinement of resistivity modeling techniques: Geophysics, 54, 766-774.
21. McGillivray, P. R., 1992, Forward modeling and inversion of dc resistivity and MMR Data: Ph.D. thesis, University of British Columbia.
22. Mufti, I. R., 1976, Finite-difference resistivity modeling for arbitrarily shaped two-dimensional structures: Geophysics, 41, 62-78.
23. Okabe, M., 1979, Treatment of singularities in the integral equation approach: Geophysics, 44, 2004-2006.
24. Orszag, S. A., 1980, Spectral methods for problems in complex geometries: J. Comput. Physics, 37, 70-92.
25. Peyret, R., 1986, Introduction to spectral methods: von Karman Institute Lecture Series, 1986-04 Rhode-Saint Genese, Belgium.
26. Poirmeur, C., and Vasseur, G., 1988, Three-dimensional modeling of a hole-to-hole electrical method: Application to the interpretation of a field survey: Geophysics, 53, 402-414.
27. Pratt, D. A., 1972, The surface integral approach to the solution of the 3-D resistivity problem: Bull., Austral., Soc. Expl. Geophys, 3, 33-50.
28. Pridmore, D. F., Hohmann, G. W., Ward, S. H., and Sill, W. R., 1981, An investigation of finite-element modeling for electrical and electromagnetic data in three dimensions: Geophysics, 46, 1009-1024.
29. Spiegel, R. J., Sturdivant, V. R., and Owen, T. E., 1980, Modeling resistivity anomalies from localized voids under irregular terrain: Geophysics, 45, 1164-1183.
30. Xu, S. Z., Gao, Z. C., and Zhao, S. K., 1988, An integral formulation for three-dimensional terrain modeling for resistivity surveys: Geophysics, 53, 546-552.
31. Xu, S. Z., Zhao, S. K., and Lou, Y. J., 1984, The boundary element method for solving the three dimensional electric field under the conditions of horizontal ground: Comput. Tech. for Geophys. and Geochem. Expl., 6, 53-60 (in Chinese).
32. Zhao, S. K., 1993, Chebyshev spectral methods for potential-field computation, Ph.D. thesis, University of British Columbia.
33. Zhao, S. K., and Yedlin, M. J., 1994. A new iterative Chebyshev spectral method for solving elliptic equations: J. Comput. Physics, 113, 215-223.
34. _ 1996, Some refinements on the finite-difference method for 3-D DC resistivity modeling: Geophysics, 61, 000-000.