Phytopathology: Introduction

Phytopathology

Volumn 92, Issue 12, 2002, Pages 1334-1336

  Subbarao, Krishna V ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036893890     PISSN: 0031949X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1094/phyto.2002.92.12.1334     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. Ajwa, H. A., Trout, T., Mueller, J., Wilhelm, S., Nelson, S. D., Soppe, R., and Shatley, D. 2002. Application of alternative fumigants through drip irrigation systems. Phytopathology 92:1349-1355.
2. Anbar, A. D., Yung, Y. L., and Chavez, F. P. 1996. Methyl bromide: Ocean sources, ocean sinks, and climate sensitivity. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 10:175-190.
3. 3 destruction by C1O and BrO within the Antarctic vortex: An analysis based on in situ ER-2 data. J. Geophys. Res. 94:11480-11520.
4. Anonymous. 1993. Alternatives to methyl bromide: Assessment of research needs and priorities. Proc. USDA Workshop Alternatives Methyl Bromide. Beltsville, MD.
5. Anonymous. 1993. The biologic and economic assessment of methyl bromide. The National Agricultural Pesticide Impact Assessment Program (NAPIAP). U.S. Dep. Agric.
6. Anonymous. 1994. Scientific Assessment of Ozone Depletion. World Meteorological Organization, Geneva.
7. Anonymous. 1998. Protecting the Ozone Layer, Vol. 6. Methyl Bromide. United Nations Environment Program, Paris.
8. Butler, J. H. 1995. Methyl bromide under scrutiny. Nature 376:469-470.
9. Chellemi, D. O. 2002. Nonchemical management of soilborne pests in fresh market vegetable production systems. Phytopathology 92:1367-1372.
10. Duniway, J. M. 2002. Status of chemical alternatives to methyl bromide for pre-plant fumigation of soil. Phytopathology 92:1337-1343.
11. Le Goupil, P. 1932. Les propriétés insecticides du bromure de methyl. Rev. Path. Vég. Ent. Agric. France 19:169-172.
12. Martin, F. N., and Bull, C. T. 2002. Biological approaches for control of root pathogens of strawberry. Phytopathology 92:1356-1362.
13. Mazzola, M., Granatstein, D. M., Elfving, D. C., Mullinix, K., and Gu, Y.-H. 2002. Cultural management of microbial community structure to enhance growth of apple in replant soils. Phytopathology 92:1363-1366.
14. Noling, J. W. 2002. The practical realities of alternatives to methyl bromide: Concluding remarks. Phytopathology 92:1373-1375.
15. Pilinis, C., King, D. B., and Saltzman, E. S. 1996. The oceans: A source or a sink of methyl bromide? Geophys. Res. Lett. 23:817-820.
16. Selwyn, M. R., Georges, J. E., and Georgiev, A. A. 1997. Estimating ozone depletion potential of methyl bromide. Risk Anal. 17:9-17.
17. Shorter, J. H., Kolb, C. E., Crill, P. M., Kerwin, R. A., Talbot, R. W., Hines, M. E., and Harriss, R. C. 1995. Rapid degradation of atmospheric methyl bromide in soils. Nature 377:717-719.
18. 3BR) from agricultural soil fumigants. Science 267:1979-1981.
19. Yarkin, C., Sunding, D., Zilberman, D., and Siebert, J. 1994. All crops should not be treated equally. Calif. Agric. 48:10-15.
20. Yates, S. R., Gan, J., Papiernik, S. K., Dungan, R., and Wang, D. 2002. Reducing fumigant emissions after soil application. Phytopathology 92:1344-1348.