The practical realities of alternatives to methyl bromide: Concluding remarks

Phytopathology

Volumn 92, Issue 12, 2002, Pages 1373-1375

  Noling, J W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036896233     PISSN: 0031949X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1094/PHYTO.2002.92.12.1373     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. Chellemi, D. O., Olson, S. M., Mitchell, D. J., Secker, I., and McSorley, R. 1997. Adaptation of soil solarization to the integrated management of soilborne pests of tomato under humid conditions. Phytopathology 87:250-258.
2. De Ceuster, T. J. J., and Hoitink, A. J. 1999. Prospects for composts and biocontrol agents as substitutes for methyl bromide in biological control of plant diseases. Compost Sci. Util. 7:6-15.
3. Duncan, L. W., and Noling, J. W. 1998. Agricultural sustainability and nematode IPM. Pages 251-287 in: Plant - Nematode Interactions. K. R. Barker, G. A. Pederson, and G. L. Windham, eds. Agronomy Society of America. Monog. Ser. Madison, WI.
4. Federal Registrar. 1993. Fed. Registrar. 58:65018-65082.
5. Hutchinson, C. M., McGiffen, M. E., Jr., Ohr, H. D., Sims, J. J., and Becker, J. O. 2000. Efficacy of methyl iodide and synergy with chloropicrin for control of fungi. Pest Manag. Sci. 56:413-418.
6. Lamberti, F., and Noling, J. W. 1999. Soil fumigation for nematode control: Present and future constraints. Page 6-14 in: Soil Solarization and Integrated Pest Management of Soilborne Pests. J. J. Stapelton, J. E. DeVay, and C. L. Elmore, eds. Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations. FAO Plant Prod. Prot. Ser. No. 147.
7. Noling, J. W. 1996. The role of soil fumigants in Florida agriculture. Pages 14-24 in: Fumigants: Environmental Fate, Exposure, and Analysis. J. N. Seiber, J. A. Knuteson, J. E. Woodrow, N. L. Wolfe, M. V. Yates, and S. R. Yates, eds. American Chemical Society Symposia Series 652.
8. Noling, J. W., and Becker, J. O. 1994. Viewpoint: The challenge of research and extension to define and implement alternatives to methyl bromide. J. Nematol. 26:573-586.
9. Noling, J. W., and Gilreath, J. P. 1999. Propargyl bromide, biorationals, and other fumigants for nematode control. Pages 331-333 in: Proc. Int. Res. Conf. Methyl Bromide Alternatives and Emissions Reductions.
10. Noling, J. W., and Gilreath, J. P. 2000. Methyl bromide: Progress and problems identifying alternatives. Citrus Veg. Magazine 64(3):A1-A15.
11. Noling, J. W., and Gilreath, J. P. 2001. Methyl bromide: Progress and problems identifying alternatives. Vol. II. Citrus Veg. Magazine 66(4):A1-A15.
12. Spreen, T. H., VanSickle, J. J., Moseley, A. E., Deepak, M. S., and Mathers, L. 1995. Use of methyl bromide and the economic impact of its proposed ban on the Florida fresh fruit and vegetable industry. Fla. Agric. Exp. Stn. Tech. Bull. 898.
13. Subbarao, K. V., Hubbard, J. C., and Koike, S. T. 1999. Evaluation of broccoli residue incorporation into field soil for Verticillium wilt control in cauliflower. Plant Dis. 83:124-129.
14. Watson, R. T., Albritton, D. L., Anderson, S. O., and Lee-Bapty, S. 1998. Methyl bromide: Its atmospheric science, technology and economics. Montreal Protocol Assessment Suppl., United Nations Environmental Programme on Behalf of the Contracting Parties to the Montreal Protocol. Nairobi, Kenya.