Spinal immobilization in trauma patients: Is it really necessary?

Current Opinion in Critical Care

Volumn 8, Issue 6, 2002, Pages 566-570

  Hauswald, Mark ^a,b,c   Braude, Darren ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOMECHANICS; DEVICE; EVALUATION; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HIGH RISK PATIENT; HUMAN; IMMOBILIZATION; ISCHEMIA; REVIEW; RISK BENEFIT ANALYSIS; SAFETY; SPINE INJURY; SPINE INSTABILITY; TREATMENT INDICATION; TREATMENT PLANNING;

ADULT; AGE FACTORS; BIOMECHANICS; CHILD; HUMANS; IMMOBILIZATION; SPINAL CORD INJURIES; TRANSPORTATION OF PATIENTS; TRIAGE; WOUNDS, NONPENETRATING;

EID: 0036891716     PISSN: 10705295     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00075198-200212000-00014     Document Type: Review

References (44)

1. McCormick P: Cervical spine immobilization before admission to the hospital. Section on Disorders of the Spine and Peripheral Nerves of the American Association of Neurological Surgeons. Neurosurgery 2002, 50(suppl):S7-S17. This is the first chapter in the latest Guidelines for the Management of Acute Cervical Spine Injuries from the Congress of Neurological Surgeons and the American Association of Neurological Surgeons, which appeared as a supplement in Neurosurgery. This is a great resource for anyone taking care of trauma patients. Each chapter begins with a summary of the evidence, followed by a review of the literature. Unfortunately, we disagree with the conclusions of this particular chapter. There is enough evidence that selective immobilization based on clinical criteria rather than mechanism of injury should at least be an option for prehospital management.
2. Kwan I, Bunn F, Roberts I: Spinal immobilization for trauma patients. In The Cochrane Library, issue 2. Oxford: Update Software; 2002.
3. Hauswald M, Ong G, Tandberg D, et al.: Out-of-hospital spinal immobilization: Its effect on neurologic injury. Acad Emerg Med 1998, 5:214-219.
4. Vaccaro AR, Silber JS: Post-traumatic spinal deformity. Spine 2001, 26(suppl):S111-S118. This review examines the long-term issues associated with spine injury and presents alternative perspectives on instability and neurologic deterioration.
5. Davis F: Spinal stability as defined by the three-column concept in acute spine trauma. Clin Orthop Rel Res 1984, 189:65-76.
6. Harrop JS, Sharan AD, Vaccaro AR, et al.: The cause of neurologic deterioration after acute cervical spinal cord injury. Spine 2001, 26:340-346.
7. Amar A, Levy M: Pathogenesis and pharmacological strategies for mitigating secondary damage in acute spinal cord injury. Neurosurgery 1999, 44:1027.
8. McCormick P: Blood pressure management after acute spinal cord injury. Section on Disorders of the Spine and Peripheral Nerves of the American Association of Neurological Surgeons. Neurosurgery 2002, 50:58-62. This is another chapter from the Neurosurgery guidelines and is a good review of the evidence on the effects of hypotension on spinal cord injury.
9. Chan D, Goldberg R, Tascone A, et al.: The effect of spinal immobilization on healthy volunteers. Ann Emerg Med 1994;23:48-51.
10. Cross DA, Baskerville J: Comparison of perceived pain with different immobilization techniques. Prehosp Emerg Care 2001, 5:270-274. This study involved healthy volunteers placed on hard spine boards or two different vacuum mattresses. Not surprisingly, the spine boards caused more pain.
11. Bauer D, Kowalski R: Effect of spinal immobilization on pulmonary function in the healthy, non-smoking man. Ann Emerg Med 1988, 17:915-918.
12. Schafermeyer R, Ribbeck BM, Gaskins J, et al.: Respiratory effects of spinal immobilization in children. Ann Emerg Med 1991, 20:1017-1019.
13. Totten V, Sugarman D: Respiratory effects of spinal immobilization. Prehosp Emerg Care 1999, 3:347-352.
14. Hauswald M, Hsu M, Stockoff C: Maximizing comfort and minimizing ischemia: A comparison of four methods of spinal immobilization. Prehosp Emerg Care 2000, 4:250-252.
15. Linares H, AR M, Suarez E, et al.: Association between pressure sores and immobilization in the immediate post-injury period. Orthopedics 1987, 10:571-573.
16. Mawson AR, Biundo JJ Jr, Neville P, et al.: Risk factors for early occurring pressure ulcers following spinal cord injury. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1988, 67:123-127.
17. Kolb JC, Summers RL, Galli RL: Cervical collar-induced changes in intracranial pressure. Am J Emerg Med 1999, 17:135-137.
18. Hunt K, Hallworth S, Smith M: The effects of rigid collar placement on intracranial and cerebral perfusion pressures. Anesthesia 2001, 56:511-513.
19. Mobbs R, Stoodley M, Fuller J: Effect of cervical hard collar on intracranial pressure after head injury. Aust N Z J Surg 2002, 72:389-391.
20. Stroh G, Braude D: Can an out-of-hospital cervical spine clearance protocol identify all patients with injuries? An argument for selective immobilization. Ann Emerg Med 2001, 37:609-615.
21. Cone D, Wydro G, Mininger C: Current practice in clinical cervical spine clearance: Implication for EMS. Prehosp Emerg Care 1999, 3:42-46.
22. Domeier RM: Prospective validation of out-of-hospital spinal clearance criteria: A preliminary report. Acad Emerg Med 1997, 4:643-646.
23. Domeier RM: Prehospital clinical findings associated with spinal injury. Prehosp Emerg Care 1997, 1:11-15.
24. Domeier RM, Evans RW, Swor RA, et al.: The reliability of prehospital clinical evaluation for potential spinal injury is not affected by mechanism of injury. Prehosp Emerg Care 1999, 3:332-337.
25. Domeier RM: Indications for prehospital spinal immobilization. National Association of EMS Physicians Standards and Practice Committee. Prehosp Emerg Care 1999, 3:251-253.
26. Hauswald M, McNally T: Confusing extrication with immobilization: The inappropriate use of hard spine boards for interhospital transfers. Air Med J 2000, 19:126-127.
27. Lerner EB, Moscati R: Duration of patient immobilization in the ED. Am J Emerg Med 2000, 18:28-30.
28. Cooke MW: Use of the spinal board within the accident and emergency department. J Accid Emerg Med 1998, 15:108-109.
29. Hoffman JR, Mower WR, Wolfson AB, et al.: Validity of a set of clinical criteria to rule out injury to the cervical spine in patients with blunt trauma. National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study Group. N Engl J Med 2000, 343: 94-99.
30. Stiell I, Wells GA, Vandemheen KL, et al.: The Canadian c-spine rule for radiography in alert and stable trauma patients. JAMA 2001, 286: 1841-1848. This study is the Canadian answer to the NEXUS trial. This is actually just the derivation of a clinical decision rule for when to obtain c-spine radiographs in asymptomatic trauma patients but includes almost 9000 patients. Prospective validation of the rule is pending.
31. Brooks RA, Willett KM: Evaluation of the Oxford protocol for total spinal clearance in the unconscious trauma patient. J Trauma 2001, 50: 862-867.
32. Harris MB, Kronlage SC, Carboni PA, et al.: Evaluation of the cervical spine in the polytrauma patient. Spine 2000, 25: 2884-2891; discussion 2892.
33. Sees DW, Rodriguez Cruz LR, Flaherty SF, et al.: The use of bedside fluoroscopy to evaluate the cervical spine in obtunded trauma patients. J Trauma 1998, 45: 768-771.
34. Chiu WC, Haan JM, Cushing BM, et al.: Ligamentous injuries of the cervical spine in unreliable blunt trauma patients: Incidence, evaluation, and outcome. J Trauma 2001, 50: 457-463.
35. Davis JW, Kaups KL, Cunningham MA, et al.: Routine evaluation of the cervical spine in head-injured patients with dynamic fluoroscopy: A reappraisal. J Trauma 2001, 50: 1044-1047.
36. McCormick P: Radiographic assessment of the cervical spine in symptomatic trauma patients. Section on Disorders of the Spine and Peripheral Nerves of the American Association of Neurological Surgeons. Neurosurgery 2002, 50(suppl): S36-S43. This chapter of the Neurosurgery supplement reviews the evaluation of the spine in the obtunded trauma patient. Based on the available evidence, the authors support very diverse practices.
37. Kokoska ER, Keller MS, Rallo MC, et al.: Characteristics of pediatric cervical spine injuries. J Pediatr Surg 2001, 36: 100-105.
38. Patel JC, Tepas JJ, Mollitt DL, et al.: Pediatric cervical spine injuries: Defining the disease. J Pediatr Surg 2001, 36: 373-376.
39. McCormick P: Management of pediatric cervical spine and spinal cord injuries. Section on Disorders of the Spine and Peripheral Nerves of the American Association of Neurological Surgeons. Neurosurgery 2002, 50(suppl): S85-S99. This chapter of the Neurosurgery guidelines reviews all of the critical issues in the early assessment and management of pediatric spinal injury. Most interestingly, they support the use of clinical rather than radiographic assessment of the spine in selected pediatric patients.
40. Viccellio P, Simon H, Pressman BD, et al.: A prospective multicenter study of cervical spine injury in children. Pediatrics [Serial Online] 2001, 108: E20. This study presents the pediatric subgroup data from the NEXUS trial. Because spinal injury is rare in young children, the numbers are small, but these are the best data available on clinical spine clearance in pediatric patients.
41. Kaups KL, Davis JW: Patients with gunshot wounds to the head do not require cervical spine immobilization and evaluation. J Trauma 1998, 44: 865-867.
42. Apfelbaum JD, Cantrill SV, Waldman N: Unstable cervical spine without spinal cord injury in penetrating neck trauma. Am J Emerg Med 2000, 18: 55-57.
43. Cornwell EE III, Chang DC, Bonar JP, et al.: Thoracolumbar immobilization for trauma patients with torso gunshot wounds: Is it necessary? Arch Surg 2001, 136: 324-327.
44. Isiklar ZU, Lindsey RW: Low-velocity civilian gunshot wounds of the spine. Orthopedics 1997, 20: 967-972.