Applicability of the 15-item versions of the judgement of line orientation test for individuals with traumatic brain injury

Brain Injury

Volumn 16, Issue 12, 2002, Pages 1051-1055

  Mount, David L ^a   Hogg, John ^a   Johnstone, Brick ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN INJURY; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; DATA ANALYSIS; DEMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HANDEDNESS; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; ORIENTATION; PATIENT EDUCATION; PERFORMANCE; RACE DIFFERENCE; RATING SCALE; READING; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SCORING SYSTEM; SEX DIFFERENCE; VALIDATION PROCESS;

EID: 0036891645     PISSN: 02699052     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02699050210154259     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Folstein, M., Folstein, S. and McHugh, P.: Mini-Mental State. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12: 189-198, 1975.
2. Moehle, K., Fitzhugh-Bell, K., Engleman, E. et al.: Statistical and diagnostic adequacy of a short form of the Halstead Category Test. International Journal of Neuroscience, 42: 107-112, 1988.
3. Russell, E. and Levy, M.: Revision of the Halstead Category Test. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55 (Suppl 6): 898-901, 1987.
4. Calsyn, D., O'Leary, M. and Chaney, E.: Shortening the Category test. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 48(Suppl 6): 788-789, 1980.
5. Franzen, M., Haut, M., Rankin, E. et al.: Empirical comparison of alternate forms of the Boston Naming Test. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 9(Suppl 3): 225-229, 1995.
6. Mack, W., Freed, D., Williams, B., et al.: Boston Naming Test: Shortened versions for use in Alzheimer's disease. Journal of Gerontology, 47: 154-158, 1992.
7. Williams, J., Mack, W. and Henderson, V.: Boston Naming Test in Alzheimer's Disease. Neuropsychologia, 27(Suppl 8): 1073-1079, 1989.
8. Axelrod, B., Jiron, C. and Henry, R.: Performance of adults aged 20 to 90 on the abbreviated Wisconsin Card Sorting Test. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 7: 205-209, 1993.
9. Schopp, L., Callahan, C., Johnstone, B. et al.: Utility of a seven subtest version of the WAIS-R among Alzheimer's disease sample. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 13: 637-643, 1998.
10. Hogg, J., Johnstone, B., Weishaar, S. et al.: Application of a short form of the Category Test for individuals with a traumatic brain injury: A cautionary note. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 15: 129-133, 2001.
11. Benton, A. L., Hamsher, K., Varney, N. R. et al.: Contributions to Neuropsychological Assessment (New York: Oxford University Press), 1983.
12. Ng, V., Eslinger, P., Williams, S. et al.: Hemispheric preference in visuospatial processing: A complementary approach with fMRI and lesion studies. Human Brain Mapping, 10: 80-86, 2000.
13. Benton, A., Sivan, A., Hamsher, K. et al.: Contributions to Neuropsychological Assessment: A Clinical Manual, 2nd edn (New York: Oxford University Press), 1994.
14. Benton, A. L. Varney, N. R. and Hamsher, K. S.: Visuospatial judgment: A clinical test. Archives of Neurology, 35: 364-367, 1978.
15. Qualls, C., Bliwise, N. and Stringer, A.: Short forms of the Benton Judgment of Line Orientation Test: Development and Psychometric properties. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 15(Suppl 2): 159-163, 2000.
16. Woodard, J., Benedict, R., Roberts, V. et al.: Short-form alternatives to the Judgment of Line Orientation Test. Journal of Clinical & Experimental Neuropsychology, 18(Suppl 6), 898-904, 1996.
17. Woodard, J., Benedict, R., Salthouse, T. et al.: Normative data for equivalent parallel forms of the Judgment of Line Orientation Test. Journal of Clinical & Experimental Neuropsychology, 20(Suppl 4): 457-462, 1998.
18. Vanderploeg, R., Lalonem L., Greblo, P. et al.: Odd-even short forms of the Judgment of Line Orientation Test. Applied Neuropsychology, 4(Suppl 4): 244-246, 1997.
19. Basso, M., Harrington, K., Matson, M. et al.: Sex differences on the WMS-III: Findings concerning verbal paired associated and faces. Clinical Neuropsychologist, 14(Suppl 2): 231-235, 2000.