Application of a short form of the category test for individuals with a traumatic brain injury: A cautionary note

Clinical Neuropsychologist

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 129-133

  Hogg, J R ^a   Johnstone, B ^a   Weishaar, S ^a   Petroski, G F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYTICAL ERROR; BRAIN INJURY; CATEGORY TEST; COGNITIVE DEFECT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; REVIEW; SCORING SYSTEM; VARIANCE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BRAIN INJURY, CHRONIC; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PSYCHOMETRICS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 0034968670     PISSN: 13854046     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1076/clin.15.1.129.1912     Document Type: Review

References (19)

1. Development of a paper-and-pencil form of the Halstead Category Test
2. A short form of the Category Test
3. Shortened Halstead Category Test
4. Clinical neuropsychological assessment: Abbreviating the Halstead Category Test of brain dysfunction
5. Clinical utility of a seven subtest WAIS-R short form in the neuropsychological assessment of traumatic brain injury
6. Shortening the Category Test
7. Age- and education-corrected, standardized short form of the Category Test
8. The Halstead Category Test: A fifty-year perspective
9. A short form of the Category Test for adults
10. Concurrent validity of a WAIS-R seven-subtest short form in patients with brain impairment
11. The construct validity of the Category Test: Is it a measure of reasoning or intelligence?
12. The Halstead Category Tests of brain dysfunction: Feasibility of a short form
13. A comparison of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test and the Category Test
14. Utility of a seven-subtest version of the WAIS-R among an Alzheimer's disease sample