Copper toxicity thresholds for important restoration grass species of the Western United States

Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry

Volumn 21, Issue 12, 2002, Pages 2692-2697

  Paschke, Mark W ^a   Redente, Edward F ^a  

^a Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences   (United States)

Author keywords

Ecological effects; Phytotoxicity; Pollution; Restoration; Risk assessment

Indexed keywords

AGRONOMY; COPPER; CROPS; ECOLOGY; PLANTS (BOTANY); REMEDIATION; RESTORATION; RISK ASSESSMENT;

SEEDLINGS;

TOXICITY;

COPPER;

COPPER; GRASS; PHYTOTOXICITY; RESTORATION ECOLOGY; RISK ASSESSMENT; SOIL POLLUTION; TOLERANCE;

AGROSTIS GIGANTEA; ARTICLE; DESCHAMPSIA CAESPITOSA; ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION; GRASS; LC 50; NONHUMAN; PHYTOTOXICITY; PLANT GROWTH; POA SECUNDA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; RYE; UNITED STATES; WHEAT;

UNITED STATES;

AGROSTIS; AGROSTIS GIGANTEA; DESCHAMPSIA CAESPITOSA; DESCHAMPSIA CESPITOSA; ELYMUS; ELYMUS TRACHYCAULUS; LEYMUS; LEYMUS CINEREUS; POA; POA SECUNDA; POACEAE; SECALE CEREALE; TRITICUM; TRITICUM AESTIVUM;

EID: 0036889343     PISSN: 07307268     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1897/1551-5028(2002)021<2692:cttfir>2.0.co;2     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Baker DE, Senft JP. 1995. Copper. In Alloway BJ, ed, Heavy Metals in Soils, 2nd Ed. Blackie Academic & Professional, London, UK, pp 179-205.
2. Kabata-Pendias A, Pendias H. 2001. Trace Elements in Soils and Plants, 3rd Ed. CRC, Boca Raton, FL, USA.
3. Ross SM. 1994. Sources and forms of potentially toxic metals in soil-Plant systems. In Ross SM, ed, Toxic Metals in Soil- Plant Systems. John Wiley, Chichester, UK, pp 3-25.
4. Lepp NW. 1981. Copper. In Lepp NW, ed, Effect of Heavy Metal Pollution on Plants. Applied Science, London, UK, pp 111-143.
5. Assche FV, Clijsters H, Van Assche F. 1990. Effects of metals on enzyme activity in plants. Plant Cell Environ 13:195-206.
6. Chang AC, Granato TC, Page AL. 1992. A methodology for establishing phytotoxicity criteria for chromium, copper, nickel, and zinc in agricultural land application of municipal sewage sludges. J Environ Qual 21:521-536.
7. Owen CA. 1981. Copper Deficiency and Toxicity: Acquired and Inherited, in Plants, Animals, and Man. Noyes Publications, Park Ridge, NJ, USA.
8. Ross SM, Kaye KJ. 1994. The meaning of metal toxicity in soil-plant systems. In Ross SM, ed, Toxic Metals in Soil - Plant Systems. John Wiley, Chichester, UK, pp 27-61.
9. Miles LJ, Parker GR. 1979. The effect of soil-added cadmium on several plant species. J Environ Qual 8:229-232.
10. Paschke MW, Redente EF, Levy DB. 2000. Zinc toxicity thresholds for important reclamation grass species of the western United States. Environ Toxicol Chern Chem 19:2751-2756.
11. Symeonidis L, McNeilly T, Bradshaw AD. 1985. Differential tolerance of three cultivars of Agrostis capillaris L. to cadmium, copper, lead, nickel and zinc. New Phytol 101:309-315.
12. Ehinger LH, Parker GR. 1979. Tolerance of Andropogon scoparius to copper and zinc. New Phytol 83:175-180.
13. Hogan GD, Rauser WE. 1979. Tolerance and toxicity of cobalt, copper, nickel and zinc in clones of Agrostis gigantea. New Phytol83:665-670.
14. Pedersen MB, Kjaer C, Elmegaard N. 2000. Toxicity and bioaccumulation of copper to black bindweed (Fallopia convolvulus) in relation to bioavailability and the age of soil contamination. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 39:431-439.
15. Ebbs S, Kochian L. 1997. Toxicity of zinc and copper to Brassica species: Implications for phytoremediation. J Environ Qual 26:776-781.
16. Wu L, Kruckeberg AL. 1985. Copper tolerance in two legume species from a copper mine habitat. New Phytol 99:565-570,
17. Humphreys MO, Nicholls MK. 1984. Relationships between tolerance to heavy metals in Agrostis capillaris L. (A. tenuis Sibth.). New Phytol 98:177-190.
18. Pollard AJ. 1980, Diversity of metal tolerances in Plantago laneolata L, from the southeastern United States, New Phytol 86:109-117.
19. Gough LP, Shacklette HT, Case AA. 1979. Element Concentrations Toxic to Plants, Animals, and Man. Geological Survey Bulletin 1466. U.S. Geological Survey, Washington, DC.
20. U.S. Code. 1980. Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act. Public Law 95-510. Title 42 U.S. Congress §9601 et seq.
21. Macnicol RD, Beckett PHT 1985. Critical tissue concentrations of potentially toxic elements. Plant Soil 85:107-129.
22. Bradley R, Burt AJ, Read DJ. 1982. The biology of mycorrhiza in the Ericaceae. VIII. The role of mycorrhizal infection in heavy metal resistance. New Phytol 91:197-209.
23. Brown MT, Wilkins DA. 1985. Zinc tolerance in mycorrhizal Betula. New Phytol 99:101-106.
24. Jones MD, Hutchinson TC. 1986. The effect of mycorrhizal infection on the response of Betula papyrifera to nickel and copper. New Phytol 102:429-442.
25. Martino E, Turnau K, Girlanda M, Bonfante P, Perotto S. 2000. Ericoid mycorrhizal fungi from heavy metal polluted soils: Their identification and growth in the presence of zinc ions. Mycol Res 104:338-344.
26. Van Tichelen KK, Colpaert JV, Vangronsveld J. 2001. Ectomycorrhizal protection of Pinus sylvestris against copper toxicity. New Phytol 150:203-213.
27. Alloway BJ. 1990. Soil processes and the behavior of metals. In Alloway BJ, ed, Heavy Metals in Soils. John Wiley, New York, NY, USA, pp 7-28.
28. Stevenson FJ, Ardakani MS. 1972. Organic matter reactions inolving micronutrients in soils. In Mortveldt JJ, Giordano PM, Lindsay WL, eds, Micronutrients in Agriculture. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI, pp 79-114.
29. Ghosh R, Banerjee DK. 1997. Complexation of trace metals with humic acids from soil, sediment and sewage. Chem Speciat Bioavailab 9:15-19.
30. Parker DR, Norvell WA. 1999. Advances in solution culture methods for plant mineral nutrition research. In Sparks DL, ed, Advances in Agronomy Vol 65. Academic, New York, NY, USA, pp 151-213.
31. Foy CD, Chaney RL, White MC. 1978. The physiology of metal toxicity in plants. Annu Rev Plant Physiol 29:511-566.
32. International Copper Association. 1998. Copper Information Sourcebook. Vancouver, BC, Canada.
33. Davis RD, Beckett PHT 1978. Upper critical levels of toxic elements in plants. 2. Critical levels of copper in young barley, wheat, rape, lettuce and ryegrass, and of nickel and zinc in young barley and ryegrass. New Phytol 80:23-32.
34. Davis RD, Beckett PHT, Wollan E. 1978. Critical levels of twenty potentially toxic elements in young spring barley. Plant Soil 49:395-408.
35. MacLean AJ, Dekker AJ. 1978. Availability of zinc, copper and nickel to plants grown in sewage-treated soils. Can J Soil Sci 58:381-389.
36. Lexmond TM, de Daan FAM. 1980. Toxicity of copper. In Gasser JKR, ed, Effluents from Livestock. Applied Science, London, UK, pp 410-419.
37. 4 applications. J Environ Qual 11:573-577.
38. Smilde KW. 1981. Heavy metal accumulation in crops grown on sewage sludge amended with metal salts. Plant Soil 62:3-14.
39. Mitchell GA, Bingham FT, Page AL. 1978. Yield and metal composition of lettuce and wheat grown on soils amended with sewage sludge enriched with cadmium, copper, nickel and zinc. J Environ Qual 7:165-171.
40. Howeler RH, Edwards DG, Asher CJ. 1982. Micronutrient deficiencies and toxicities of cassava plants grown in nutrient solutions. I. Critical tissue concentrations. J Plant Nutr 5:1059-1076.
41. Wallace A, Romney EM. 1977. Synergistic trace elements effects in plants. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 8:699-707.
42. Wallace A, Romney EM, Alexander GV, Kinnear J. 1977. Phytotoxicity and some interactions of the essential trace metals iron, manganese, molybdenum, zinc, copper and boron. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 8:741-750,
43. Moore DP, Harward ME, Manson DD, Hader RJ, Lott WL, Jackson WA. 1957. An investigation of some of the relationships between copper, iron and molybdenum in the growth and nutrition of lettuce, Soil Sci Soc Am Proc 21:65-74,
44. McKay DC, Chipman EW, Gupta UC, 1966. Copper and molybdenum nutrition of crops grown on acid sphagnum peat soil. Soil Sci Soc Am Proc 30:755-759.
45. Hara T, Sonoda Y. 1979. Comparison of the toxicity of heavy metals to cabbage growth, Plant Soil 51:127-133.