Cross-validation of the revised motivation for physical activity measure in active women

Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport

Volumn 73, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 471-477

  Wilson, Philip M ^a   Rodgers, Wendy M ^a   Fraser, Shawn N ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Self determination theory; Validity

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; EXERCISE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MIDDLE AGED; MOTIVATION; PERSONAL AUTONOMY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; REPRODUCIBILITY; SELF EVALUATION; SOCIAL DISTANCE; SPORTS MEDICINE; STANDARD; VALIDATION STUDY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; EXERCISE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; MOTIVATION; PERSONAL AUTONOMY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SELF ASSESSMENT (PSYCHOLOGY); SOCIAL DISTANCE; SPORTS MEDICINE;

EID: 0036886266     PISSN: 02701367     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02701367.2002.10609048     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Arbuckle, J. L. (1997). AMOS (Version 3.6) [Computer software]. Chicago, IL: Smallwaters.
2. Byrne, B. M. (1994). Structural equation modeling with EQS and EQS/Windows: Basic concepts, applications, & programming. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
3. Craig, C. L., Russell, S. J., Cameron, C., & Beaulieu, A. (1999). Foundation for Joint Action: Reducing physical inactivity. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Fitness and Lifestyle Research Institute.
4. Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297-234.
5. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum Press.
6. Frederick, C., & Ryan, R. (1993). Differences in motivation for sport and exercise and their relations with participation and mental health. Journal of Sport Behavior, 16, 124-146.
7. Gardner, D. G., Cummings, L. L., Dunham, R. B., & Pierce, J. L. (1998). Single-item versus multiple-item measurement scales: An empirical example. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 58, 898-906.
8. Hoyle, R. H., & Panter, A. T. (1995). Writing about structural equation models. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 158-176). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9. Hu, L., & Bender, P. M. (1995). Evaluating model fit. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 76-99). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10. Kelloway, E. K. (1998). Using LISREL for structural equation modeling - A researcher's guide. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11. Macallum, R. C., Roznowski, M., & Necowitz, L. B. (1992). Model modifications in covariance structure analysis: The problem of capitalization on chance. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 490-504.
12. Maruyama, G. M. (1998). Basics of structural equation modeling. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13. Messick, S. (1995). Validity of psychological assessment: Validation of inferences from persons' responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning. American Psychologist, 50, 741-749.
14. Mullen, E., & Markland, D. (1997). Variations in self-determination across the stages of change for exercise in adults. Motivation and Emotion, 21, 349-362.
15. Pollock, M. L., Gaesser, G. A., Butcher, J. D., Despres, J. P., Dishman, R. K., Franklin, B. A., & Ewing Garber, C. (1998). The recommended quantity and quality of exercise for developing and maintaining cardiorespiratory and muscular fitness, and flexibility in healthy adults. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 30, 975-991.
16. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well being. American Psychologist, 55, 68-78.
17. Ryan, R. M., Frederick, C. M., Lepes, D., Rubio, N., & Sheldon, K. M. (1997). Intrinsic motivation and exercise adherence. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 28, 335-354.
18. Safrit, M. J., & Wood, T. M. (1995). Introduction to measurement in physical education and exercise science (3rd ed.). St Louis, MO: Mosby.
19. Sheldon, K. M., & Elliot, A. J. (1999). Goal striving, need satisfaction, and psychological well-being: The self-concordance model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 482-497.
20. Sheldon, K. M., Ryan, R. M., & Reis, H. (1996). What makes for a good day? Competence and autonomy in the day and in the person. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 1270-1279.
21. Thompson, B. (2000). Ten commandments of structural equation modeling. In L. G. Grimm & P. R. Yarnold (Eds.), Reading and understanding more multivariate statistics, (pp. 261-285). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
22. Vallerand, R., & Fortier, M. (1998). Measures of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in sport and physical activity: A review and critique. In J. Duda (Ed.), Advances in sport and exercise psychology measurement, (pp. 81-101). Morgantown, WV: Fitness Information Technology.
23. West, S. G., Finch, J. F., & Curran, P. J. (1995). Structural equation models with nonnormal variables: Problems and remedies. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 56-75). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.