Spatial factors and stated preference values for public goods: Considerations for rural land use

Land Economics

Volumn 78, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 481-500

  Johnston, Robert J ^a   Swallow, Stephen K ^b   Bauer, Dana Marie ^c  

^a Connecticut Sea Grant ^*  (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ATTITUDINAL SURVEY; PUBLIC GOODS; RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT; RURAL AREA; WILLINGNESS TO PAY;

NEW ENGLAND; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0036881023     PISSN: 00237639     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/3146848     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Adamowicz, W., J. Swait, P. Boxall, J. Louviere, and M. Williams. 1997. "Perceptions versus Objective Measures of Environmental Quality in Combined Revealed and Stated Preference Models of Environmental Valuation." Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 32 (1): 65-84.
2. Adamowicz, W., P. Boxall, M. Williams, and J. Louviere. 1998. "Stated Preference Approaches for Measuring Passive Use Values: Choice Experiments and Contingent Valuation." American Journal of Agricultural Economics 80 (1): 64-75.
3. Alberini, A., B. Kanninen, and R. T. Carson. 1997. "Modeling Response Incentive Effects in Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation Data." Land Economics 73 (Aug.): 309-24.
4. Arendt, R., E. Brabec, H. Dodson, C. Reid, and R. Yaro. 1994. Rural by Design: Maintaining Small Town Character. Chicago, III.: American Planning Association.
5. Babbitt, B. 1999. "Noah's Mandate and the Birth of Urban Bioplanning." Conservation Biology 13 (June): 677-78.
6. Bateman, I. J., and I. H. Langford. 1997. "Non- users' Willingness to Pay for a National Park: An Application and Critique of the Contingent Valuation Method." Regional Studies 31 (6): 571-82.
7. Bergstrom, J. C., and J. R. Stoll. 1989. "Application of Experimental Economics Concepts and Precepts to CVM Field Survey Procedures." Western Journal of Agricultural Economics 14 (1): 98-109.
8. Bergstrom, J. D., J. R. Stoll, and A. Randall. 1989. "Information Effects in Contingent Markets." American Journal of Agricultural Economics 71 (3): 321-23.
9. Blamey, R. K. 1998. "Contingent Valuation and the Activation of Environmental Norms." Ecological Economics 24 (1): 47-72.
10. Blamey, R. K., J. W. Bennett, J. J. Louviere, M. D. Morrison, and J. Rolfe. 2000. "A Test of Policy Labels in Environmental Choice Modeling Studies." Ecological Economics 32 (2): 269-86.
11. Bockstael, N. E. 1996. "Modeling Economics and Ecology: The Importance of a Spatial Perspective." American Journal of Agricultural Economics 78 (5): 1168-80.
12. Boos, D. 1992. "On Generalized Score Tests." The American Statistician 46 (4): 327-33.
13. Calthorpe, P. 1993. The Next American Metropolis: Ecology, Community, and the American Dream. New York: Princeton Architectural Press.
14. Connolly, M. A., and K. Y. Liang. 1988. "Conditional Logistic Regression Models for Correlated Binary Data." Biometrika 75 (3): 501-6.
15. Cummings, R. G., P. T. Ganderton, and T. McGuckin. 1994. "Substitution Effects in CVM Values." American Journal of Agricultural Economics 76 (2): 205-14.
16. Des Rosiers, F., and M. Theriault. 1992. "Integrating Geographic Information Systems to Hedonic Price Modeling: An Application to the Quebec Region." Property Tax Journal 11 (1): 29-57.
17. Desvousges, W. H., F. R. Johnson, and H. S. Banzhaf. 1998. Environmental Policy Analysis with Limited Information: Principles and Applications of the Transfer Method. Northampton, Mass.: Edward Elgar Publishers.
18. Dillman, D. A. 2000. Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
19. Dubin, R. 1992. "Spatial Autocorrelations and Neighborhood Quality." Regional Science and Urban Economics 22 (3): 433-52.
20. Friesen, Lyle E., Paul F. J. Eagles, and R. J. MacKay. 1995. "Effects of Residential Development on Forest-Dwelling Neotropical Song Birds." Conservation Biology 9 (Dec.): 1408-14.
21. Geoghegan, J., L. Wainger, and N. Bockstael. 1997. "Spatial Landscape Indices in a Hedonic Framework: An Ecological Economics Analysis Using GIS." Ecological Economics 23 (3): 251-64.
22. Glynn, R. J., and B. Rosner. 1994. "Comparison of Alternative Regression Models for Paired Binary Data." Statistics in Medicine 13 (10): 1023-36.
23. Gordon, P., and H. W. Richardson. 1998. "Prove It: The Costs and Benefits of Sprawl." The Brookings Review 16 (1): 23-25.
24. Hailu, A., W. L. Adamowicz, and P. C. Boxall. 2000. "Complements, Substitutes, Budget Constraints, and Valuation: Application of a Multi-Program Environmental Valuation Method." Environmental and Resource Economics 16 (1): 51-68.
25. Hanemann, W. M. 1984. "Welfare Evaluations in Contingent Valuation Experiments with Discrete Responses." American Journal of Agricultural Economics 66 (3): 332-41.
26. Hoehn, J. P. 1991. "Valuing the Multidimensional Impacts of Environmental Policy: Theory and Methods." American Journal of Agricultural Economics 73 (2): 289-99.
27. Hoehn, J. P., and J. B. Loomis. 1993. "Substitution Effects in the Valuation of Multiple Environmental Programs." Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 25 (1): 56-75.
28. Hoehn, J. P., and A. Randall. 1989. "Too Many Proposals Pass the Benefit Cost Test." American Economics Review 79 (3): 544-51.
29. Hof, J. G., and L. A. Joyce. 1992. "Spatial Optimization for Wildlife and Timber in Managed Forest Ecosystems." Forest Science 38 (3): 489-508.
30. Johnson, F. R., and W. H. Desvousges. 1997. "Estimating Stated Preferences with Rated- pair Data: Environmental, Health, and Employment Effects of Energy Programs." Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 34 (1): 79-99.
31. Johnston, R. J., S. K. Swallow, and T. F. Weaver. 1999. "Estimating Willingness to Pay and Resource Trade-offs With Different Payment Mechanisms: An Evaluation of a Funding Guarantee for Watershed Management." Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 38 (1): 97-120.
32. Johnston, R. J., T. F. Weaver, L. A. Smith, and S. K. Swallow. 1995. "Contingent Valuation Focus Groups: Insights from Ethnographic Interview Techniques." Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 24 (1): 56-69.
33. Kline, J., and D. Wichelns. 1998. "Measuring Heterogeneous Preferences for Preserving Farmland and Open Space." Ecological Economics 26 (2): 211-24.
34. Knight, Richard L., George N. Wallace, and William E. Riebsame. 1995. "Ranching the View: Subdivisions versus Agriculture." Conservation Biology 9 (April): 459-61.
35. Kramer, R. A., and D. E. Mercer. 1997. "Valuing a Global Environmental Good: U.S. Residents' Willingness to Pay to Protect Tropical Rain Forests." Land Economics 73 (May): 196-210.
36. Krinsky, I., and R. Robb. 1986. "On Approximating the Statistical Properties of Elasticities." Review of Economics and Statistics 68 (2): 715-19.
37. Liang, K. Y., and S. L. Zeger. 1986. "Longitudinal Data Analysis Using Generalized Linear Models." Biometrika 73(1): 13-22.
38. Lipsitz, S. R., N. M. Laird, and D. P. Harrington. 1990. "Maximum Likelihood Regression Models for Paired Binary Data." Statistics in Medicine 9 (12): 1517-25.
39. McConnell, K. E. 1990. "Models for Referendum Data: The Structure of Discrete Choice Models for Contingent Valuation." Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 19 (1): 19-34.
40. Maddala, G. S. 1983. Limited Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
41. Mahan, B. L., S. Polasky, and R. M. Adams. 2000. "Valuing Urban Wetlands: A Property Price Approach." Land Economics 76 (Feb.): 100-13.
42. Mantell, M. A., S. F. Harper, and L. Propst. 1990. Creating Successful Communities: A Guidebook to Growth Management Strategies. Washington, D.C.: Island Press
43. Meffe, G. K., C. R. Carroll and contributors. 1997. Principles of Conservation Biology. 2nd. ed. Sunderland, Mass.: Sinauer Associates.
44. Mitchell, R. C., and R. T. Carson. 1989. Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method. Washington, D.C.: Resources for the Future.
45. Nijkamp, P. 1999. "Environmental and Regional Economics." In Handbook of Environmental and Resource Economics, 525-38, ed. J. C. J. M. van den Bergh. Cheltenham, U.K.: Edward Elgar.
46. Noss, R. F., and A. Y. Cooperrider. 1994. Saving Nature's Legacy: Protecting and Restoring Biodiversity. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.
47. Opaluch, J. J., S. K. Swallow, T. Weaver, C. Wessells, and D. Wichelns. 1993. "Evaluating Impacts from Noxious Facilities: Including Public Preferences in Current Siting Mechanisms." Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 24 (1): 41-59.
48. Park, T., J. B. Loomis, and M. Creel. 1991. "Confidence Intervals for Evaluating Benefits Estimates from Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation Studies." Land Economics 67 (Feb.): 64-73.
49. Pendergast, J. F., S. J. Gange, M. A. Newton, M. J. Lindstrom, M. Palta, and M. R. Fisher. 1996. Survey of Methods for Analyzing Clustered Binary Response Data." International Statistical Review 64 (1): 89-118.
50. Poe, G. L., M. P. Welsh, and P. A. Champ. 1997. "Measuring the Difference in Mean Willingness to Pay when Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation Responses Are Not Independent." Land Economics 73 (May): 255-67.
51. Ready, R. C., J. C. Whitehead, and G. C. Blomquist. 1995. "Contingent Valuation When Respondents are Ambivalent." Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 29 (2): 181-96.
52. Roe, B., K. J. Boyle and M. F. Teisl. 1996. "Using Conjoint Analysis to Derive Estimates of Compensating Variation." Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 31 (2): 145-59.
53. Rotnitsky, A., and N. P. Jewell. 1990. "Hypothesis Testing of Regression Parameters in Semi-parametric Generalized Linear Models for Cluster Correlated Data." Biometrika 77 (3): 485-97.
54. SAS Institute. 2000. Statistical Analysis Software (SAS) Release 8.01 Online Documentation. Cary, N.C: The SAS Institute.
55. Schkade, D. A., and J. W. Payne. 1994. "How People Respond to Contingent Valuation Questions: A Verbal Protocol Analysis of Willingness to Pay for an Environmental Regulation." Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 26 (1): 88-109.
56. Stata Corporation. 2001. Stata Statistical Software Release 7.0 Reference Guide. College Station, Texas: Stata Corporation.
57. Swallow, S. K. 1996. "Economic Issues in Ecosystem Management: An Introduction and Overview." Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 25 (2): 83-100.
58. Train, K. E. 1998. "Recreation Demand Models with Taste Variation Over People." Land Economics 74 (May): 230-39.
59. U.S. E.P.A., Undated. Smart Growth Strategies for New England: Action Plan. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Region 1, New England. url: http://www.epa.gov/ region01/spraw1/action.html (revised 1/25/ 2000).
60. van den Bergh, J. C. J. M. 1999. "An Overview of Environmental and Resource Economics." In Handbook of Environmental and Resource Economics, 3-31, ed. J. C. J. M. van den Bergh. Cheltenham, U.K.: Edward Elgar.
61. Wedderburn, R. W. M. 1974. "Quasi-Likelihood Functions, Generalized Linear Models, and the Gauss-Newton Method." Biometrika 61 (3): 439-48.