Ultrasound biometry and fetal growth restriction

Fetal and Maternal Medicine Review

Volumn 13, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 249-259

  Gardosi, Jason ^a  

^a West Midlands Perinatal Institute   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

APGAR SCORE; BIOMETRY; BIPARIETAL DISTANCE; BIRTH WEIGHT; COLOR ULTRASOUND FLOWMETRY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC ERROR; ECHOGRAPHY; FETUS; FETUS GROWTH; FETUS WEIGHT; HEAD CIRCUMFERENCE; HIGH RISK PREGNANCY; HUMAN; INTRAUTERINE GROWTH RETARDATION; PREGNANCY COMPLICATION; PRENATAL CARE; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS; REVIEW;

EID: 0036875902     PISSN: 09655395     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0965539502000426     Document Type: Review

References (53)

1. Alfirevic Z, Nielson JP. Doppler ultrasonography in high risk pregnancies: systematic review with meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995; 172: 1379-387.
2. Soothill PW, Ajayi RA, Campbell S, Nicolaides KH. Prediction of morbidity in small and normally grown fetuses by fetal heart rate variability, biophysical profile score and umbilical artery Doppler studies. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1993; 100: 742-45.
3. Chang TC, Robson SC, Spencer JA, Gallivan S. Prediction of perinatal morbidity at term in small fetuses: comparison of fetal growth and Doppler ultrasound Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1994; 101: 422-27.
4. Chien PF, Arnott N, Gordon A, Owen P, Khan KS. How useful is the uterine artery Doppler flow velocimetry in the prediction of pre-eclampsia, intrauterine growth retardation and perinatal death? An overview. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2000; 107: 196-208.
5. Chang TC, Robson SC, Boys RJ, Spencer JAD. Prediction of the small for gestational age infant: Which ultrasonic measurement is best? Obstet Gynecol 1992; 80: 1030-1037.
6. Chitty LS, Altman DG. Charts of fetal size. In: Dewbury KMH, Cosgrove D, eds. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynaecology. London: Churchill Livingstone, 1993: 513-95.
7. Todros T, Plazzotta C, Pastorin L. Body proportionality of the small-for-date fetus: is it related to aetiological factors? Early Hum Dev 1996; 45: 1-9.
8. Blackwell SC, Moldenhauer J, Redman M, Hassan SS, Wolfe HM, Berry SM. Relationship between the sonographic pattern of intrauterine growth restriction and acid base status at the time of cordocentesis. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2001; 13: 191-93.
9. Colley NV, Tremble JM, Henson GL, Cole TJ. Head circumference/abdominal circumference ratio, ponderal index and fetal malnutrition. Should head circumference/abdominal circumference ratio be abandoned? Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1991; 98: 524-27.
10. Kramer MS, Olivier M, McLean FH, Willis DM, Usher RH. Impact of intrauterine growth retardation and body proportionality on fetal and neonatal outcome. Pediatrics 1990; 86: 707-13.
11. Lin C, Su S, River P. Comparison of associated high-risk factors and perinatal outcome between symmetric and asymmetric fetal intrauterine growth retardation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991; 164: 1535-542.
12. Mongelli M, Gardosi J. Gestation adjusted projection of estimated fetal weight. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1996; 75: 28-31.
13. Chien PF, Owen P, KS K. Validity of ultrasound estimation of fetal weight. Obstet Gynecol 2000; 95: 856-60.
14. Persson PH, Weldner BM. Intrauterine weight curves obtained by ultrasound. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1986; 65: 169-73.
15. Hadlock FP, Harrist RB, Sharman RS, Deter RL, Park SK. Estimation of fetal weight with the use of head, body and femur measurements - a prospective study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985; 151: 333-37.
16. Dalsgaard L, Wiberg N, Dragsted N. Quality control of ultrasound weight estimation in a central hospital. Ugeskrift for Laeger 2002; 164: 2280-283.
17. Marsal K, Persson P-H, Larsen T, Lilja H, Selbing A, Sultan B. Intrauterine growth curves based on ultrasonically estimated foetal weights. Acta Paediatrica 1996; 85: 843-48.
18. Venkat A, Chinnaiya A, Gopal M, Mongelli M. Sonographic fetal weight estimation in a southeast Asian population. J Obstet Gynaecol Research 2001; 27: 275-79.
19. Chauhan SP, West DJ, Scardo JA, Boyd JM, Joiner J, Hendrix NW. Antepartum detection of macrosomic fetus: clinical versus sonographic, including soft-tissue measurements. Obstet Gynecol 2000; 95: 639-42.
20. Sabbagha RE, Minogue J, Tamura RK, Hungerford SA. Estimation of birth weight by use of ultrasonographic fomulas targeted to large-, appropriate-, and small-for-gestational-age fetuses. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989; 160: 854-62.
21. Weiner CP, Sabbagha RE, Vaisrub N, Socol ML. Ultrasonic fetal weight prediction: role of head circumference and femur length. Obstet Gynecol 1985; 65: 812-16.
22. Kaaij MW, Struijk PC, Lotgering FK. Accuracy of sonographic estimates of fetal weight in very small infants. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1999; 13: 99-102.
23. Jouannic J-M, Grange G, Goffinet F, Benachi A, Cabrol D. Validity of sonographic formulas for estimating fetal weight below 1250g: a series of 119 cases. Fetal Diagn Ther 2001; 16: 254-58.
24. Campbell S, Wilkin D. Ultrasonic measurement of fetal abdomen circumference in the estimation of fetal weight. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1975; 82: 689-97.
25. Hadlock FP, Harrist RB, Carpenter RJ, Deter RL, Park SK. Sonographic estimation of fetal weight. Radiology 1984; 150: 535-540.
26. Shild RL, Fimmers R, Hansmann M. Fetal weight estimation by three-dimensional ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2000; 16: 445-52.
27. Mongelli M, Biswas A. Menstrual age-dependent systematic error in sonographic fetal weight estimation: a mathematical model. J Clin Ultrasound 2002; 30: 139-44.
28. Pinette MG, Pan Y, Pinette SG, Blackstone J, Garrett J, Cartin A. Estimation of fetal weight: mean value from multiple formulas. J Ultrasound Medicine 1999; 18: 813-17.
29. Edwards A, Goff J, Baker L. Accuracy and modifying factors of the sonographic estimation of fetal weight in a high risk population. Aust NZ J Obstet Gynaecol 2001; 41: 187-90.
30. Deter RL, Rossavik IK, Harrist RB, Hadlock FP. Mathematic modelling of fetal growth: Development of individual growth curve standards. Obstet Gynecol 1986; 68: 156-61.
31. Shields LE, Huff RW, Jackson GM, Olive DL, Petterson RM. Fetal growth: a comparison of growth curves with mathematical modeling. J Ultrasound Med 1993; 5: 271-74.
32. Owen P, Burton K, Ogston S, Khan KS. Howie PW. Using unconditional and conditional standard deviation scores of fetal abdominal area measurements in the prediction of intrauterine growth restriction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2000; 16: 439-44.
33. Gardosi J, Chang A, Kalyan B, Sahota D, Symonds EM. Customised antenatal growth charts. Lancet 1992; 339: 283-87.
34. Gardosi J, Mongelli M, Wilcox M, Chang A. An adjustable fetal weight standard. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1995; 6: 168-74.
35. Gardosi J. The application of individualised fetal growth curves. J Perinatal Med 1998; 26: 137-42.
36. Mongelli M, Gardosi J. Longitudinal study of fetal growth in subgroups of a low risk population. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1995; 6: 340-44.
37. de Jong CLD, Gardosi J, Baldwin C, Francis A, Dekker GA, van Geijn HP. Fetal weight gain in a serially scanned high-risk population. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1998; 11: 39-43.
38. Mongelli M, Gardosi J. Reduction of false-positive diagnosis of fetal growth restriction by application of customized fetal growth standards. Obstet Gynecol 1996; 88: 844-48.
39. de Jong CLD, Francis A, vanGeijn HP, Gardosi J. Fetal growth rate and adverse perinatal events. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1998; 13: 86-89.
40. Wilcox M, Gardosi J, Mongelli M, Ray C, Johnson I. Birth weight from pregnancies dated by ultrasonography in a multicultural British population. Br Med J 1993; 307: 588-91.
41. Sanderson DA, Wilcox MA, Johnson IR. The individualized birth weight ratio: a new method of identifying intrauterine growth retardation. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1994; 101: 310-14.
42. Owen P, Farrell T, Hardwick JCR, Khan KS. Relationship between customised birthweight centiles and neonatal anthropometric features of growth restriction. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2002; 109: 658-62.
43. de Jong CLD, Gardosi J, Dekker GA, Colenbrander GJ, van Geijn HP. Application of a customised birthweight standard in the assessment of perinatal outcome in a high risk population. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1998; 105: 531-35.
44. Clausson B, Gardosi J, Francis A, Cnattingius S. Perinatal outcome in SGA births defined by customised versus population based birthweight standards. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2001; 108: 830-34.
45. Hepburn M, Rosenberg K. An audit of the detection and management of small-for-gestational age babies. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1986; 93: 212-16.
46. Sim D, Beattie RB, Dornan JC. Evaluation of biophysical assessment in high risk pregnancy to assess ultrasound parameters suitable for screening in the low risk population. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1993; 3: 11-17.
47. Kean LH, Liu DT. Antenatal care as a screening tool for the detection of small for gestational age babies in the low risk population. J Obstet Gynaecol 1996; 16: 77-82.
48. Backe B, Nakling J. Effectiveness of antenatal care: a population based study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1993; 100: 727-32.
49. Jahn A, Razum O, Berle P. Routine screening for intrauterine growth retardation in Germany: low sensitivity and questionable benefit for diagnosed cases. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1998; 77: 643-48.
50. Mongelli M, Gardosi J. Symphysis-fundus height and pregnancy characteristics in ultrasound-dated pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol 1999; 94: 591-94.
51. Gardosi J, Francis A. Controlled trial of fundal height measurement plotted on customised antenatal growth charts. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1999; 106: 309-17.
52. Maternal and Child Health Consortium. CESDI 8th Annual Report: Confidential Enquiry of Stillbirths and Deaths in Infancy, 2001.
53. Barker DJP. Long term outcome of retarded fetal growth. In: Divon MY ed. Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven, 1997: 853-63.