Machining with tool-chip contact on the tool secondary rake face - Part II: Analysis and discussion

International Journal of Mechanical Sciences

Volumn 44, Issue 11, 2002, Pages 2355-2368

  Fang, N ^a  

^a UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Chip thickness; Double rake angled tool; Forces; Machining; Natural tool chip contact length; Slip line

Indexed keywords

FRICTION; MACHINE TOOLS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MONITORING;

TOOL SECONDARY RAKE FACE;

MACHINING;

EID: 0036873855     PISSN: 00207403     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0020-7403(02)00184-4     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Fang N. Machining with tool-chip contact on the tool secondary rake face - Part I: a new slip-line model. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, this issue, doi:10.1016/S0020-7403(02)00185-6.
2. Merchant M.E. Basic mechanics of the metal cutting process. Transactions of the ASME. 66:1944;A168-A175.
3. Dewhurst P. On the non-uniqueness of the machining Process. Proceedings of Royal Society of London, Series A. 360:1978;587-610.
4. Kudo H. Some new slip-line solutions for two-dimensional steady-state machining. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences. 7:1965;43-55.
5. Fang N., Jawahir I.S., Oxley P.L.B. A universal slip-line model with non-unique solutions for machining with curled chip formation and a restricted contact tool. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences. 43:2001;557-580.
6. Shi T., Ramalingam S. Modeling chip formation with grooved tools. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences. 35(9):1993;741-756.
7. Johnson W. Some slip-line fields for swaging or expanding indenting, extruding and machining for tools with curved dies. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences. 4:1962;323-347.
8. Usui E, Hoshi K. Slip-line fields in metal machining which involve centered fans. Proceedings of International Production Engineering Research Conference, ASME, Pittsburgh, 1963; 61-71.
9. Lee E.H., Shaffer B.W. The theory of plasticity applied to a problem of machining. Transactions of the ASME. 73:1951;405-413.
10. Oxley P.L.B. The mechanics of machining: an analytical approach to assessing machinability. 1989;Ellis Horwood Limited, Chichester.
11. Oxley P.L.B. Modeling machining processes with a view to their optimization and to the adaptive control of metal cutting machine tools. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing. 4:1988;103-119.
12. Childs T.H.C., Maekawa K., Obikawa T., Yamane Y. Metal machining theory and applications. 2001;Arnold, London.
13. Ozel T., Taylan A. Determination of workpiece flow stress and friction at the chip-tool contact for high speed cutting. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture. 40:2000;133-152.
14. Oxley P.L.B., Hastings W.F. Predicting the strain rate in the zone of intense shear in which the chip is formed in machining from the dynamic flow stress properties of the work material and the cutting conditions. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A356:1977;395-410.
15. Campbell J.D., Ferguson W.G. The temperature and strain-rate dependence of the shear strength of mild steel. Philosophy Magazine. 21:1970;63-81.
16. Friedman M.Y., Lenz E. Investigation of the tool-chip contact length in metal cutting. International Journal of Machine Tool Design and Research. 10:1970;401-416.
17. Gad G.S., Armarego E.J.A., Smith A.J.R. Tool-chip contact length in orthogonal machining and its importance in tool temperature predictions. International Journal of Production Research. 30:1992;485-501.
18. Shih A.J. Finite element analysis of the rake angle effects on orthogonal metal cutting. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences. 38:1996;1-17.
19. Zorev N.N. Metal cutting mechanics. 1966;Pergamon Press, Oxford.
20. Trent E.M. Metal cutting and the tribology of seizure. I seizure in metal cutting Wear. 128:1988;29-45.
21. Trent E.M. Metal cutting and the tribology of seizure. II movement of work material over the tool in metal cutting Wear. 128:1988;47-64.
22. Trent E.M. Metal cutting and the tribology of seizure. III temperatures in metal cutting Wear. 128:1988;65-81.
23. Childs T.H.C., Mahdi M.I. On the stress distribution between the chip and the tool during metal cutting. Annals of the CIRP. 3:1989;55-58.
24. Kato S, Yamaguchi K, Yamada M. Stress distribution at the interface between tool and chip in machining. Transactions of the ASME, Journal of Engineering for Industry 1972; 683-9.
25. Barrow G., Graham W., Kurimoto T., Leong Y.F. Determination of rake face stress distribution in orthogonal machining. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture. 22:1982;75-85.
26. Arsecularatne J.A. On tool-chip interface stress distributions, ploughing force and size effect in machining. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture. 37:1997;885-899.
27. Brown C.A. A practical method for estimating machining forces from tool-chip contact area. Annals of the CIRP. 32:1983;91-95.
28. Dewhurst P. The effect of chip breaker constraints on the mechanics of the machining process. Annals of the CIRP. 28:1979;1-5.
29. Fang N, Jawahir IS. Analytical prediction of chip back-flow angle in machining with restricted contact grooved tools. Transactions of the ASME, Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology, in press.
30. Strenkowski J.S., Athavale S.M. A partially constrained Eulerian orthogonal cutting model for chip control tool. Transactions of the ASME, Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering. 119:1997;681-688.
31. Zhu R., Kapoor S.G., Devor R.E., Athavale S.M. Mechanistic force models for chip control tools. Transactions of the ASME, Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering. 121:1999;408-416.