Therapeutic jurisprudence and "good lives": A rehabilitation framework for corrections

Australian Psychologist

Volumn 37, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 180-186

  Birgden, Astrid ^a  

^a Department of Justice ^*  (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036870862     PISSN: 00050067     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00050060210001706856     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Andrews, D. (1995). The psychology of criminal conduct and effective treatment. In J. McGuire (Ed)., What Works: Reducing reoffending: Guidelines from research and practice, (pp. 35-62). Brisbane: John Wiley & Sons.
2. Bergman, J. (2000). Creating new cultures: Using drama therapy to build therapeutic communities in prisons. In P. Lewis, & D.R. Johnson (Eds.), Current approaches in drama therapy (pp. 303-330). Springfield, IL, US: Charles C. Thomas.
3. Birgden, A. (2002). Dealing with the resistant criminal client: A psychologically-minded strategy for more effective legal counseling. Criminal Law Bulletin, 38(2), 225-233.
4. Birgden, A., & McLachlan, C. (2002). Reducing reoffending framework: Setting the scene. Office of the Correctional Services Commissioner. Retrieved May 31, 2002, from http://www.justice.vic.gov.au
5. Birgden, A., Owen, K., & Raymond, B. (in press). Enhancing relapse prevention through the effective management of sex offenders in the community. In T. Ward., S. Hudson., & R, Laws (Eds.), Sexual deviance: Issues and controversies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
6. Birgden, A., & Vincent, F. (2000). Maximizing therapeutic effects in treating sexual offenders in an Australian correctional system. Behavioural Sciences and Law, 18(4), 479-488.
7. Birgden, A., & Ward. T. (in press). Pragmatic psychology through a therapeutic jurisprudence lens: Psycholegal soft spots in the criminal justice system. Psychology, Public Policy and Law.
8. Bonta, J. (1996). Risk-needs assessment and treatment. In A.T. Harland (Ed.), Choosing correctional options that work: Defining the demand and evaluating the supply (pp. 18-32). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9. Brookbanks, W. (2001). Therapeutic jurisprudence: Conceiving an ethical framework. Journal of Law and Medicine, 8, 328-341.
10. Casey P., & Rottman D. B. (1998). Therapeutic jurisprudence in the courts. Behavioural Sciences and the Law, 18, 445-457.
11. Day, A., & Howells, K. (2002). Psychological treatments for rehabilitating offenders: Evidence-based practice comes of age. Australian Psychologist, 37(1), 39-47.
12. Finkelman, D., & Grisso, T. (1996). Therapeutic jurisprudence: From idea to application. In D.B. Wexler & B.J. Winick (Eds.), The law in a therapeutic key: Developments in therapeutic jurisprudence (pp. 587-596). Carolina: Carolina University Press.
13. Fox, R. (1999). Competition in sentencing: The rehabilitative model versus the punitive model. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 6, 153-162.
14. Gendreau, P. (1996). Offender rehabilitation: What we know and what needs to be done. Criminal Justice and Behaviour, 23, 144-161.
15. Gendreau, P., & Andrews, D.A. (1990). Tertiary prevention: What the meta-analysis of the offender treatment literature tells us about "what works". Canadian Journal of Criminology, 32, 173-184.
16. Gendreau, P., Goggin, C., & Smith, P. (2002). Implementation guidelines for correctional programs in the "real world" (pp. 247-268). In G.A. Bernfeld, D.P. Farrington, & A.W. Leschied (Eds.), Offender rehabilitation in practice: Implementing and evaluating effective programs. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
17. Gornik, M. (2002). Moving from correctional program to correctional strategy: Using proven practices to change criminal behaviour. The ICCA Journal on Community Corrections, April, 24-33.
18. Gould, K.A. (1996) Turning rat and doing time for uncharged, dismissed, or acquitted crimes: Do the federal sentencing guidelines promote respect for the law? In D.B. Wexler & B.J. Winick (Eds.), The law in a therapeutic key: Developments in therapeutic jurisprudence (pp. 171-202). Carolina: Carolina University Press.
19. Hora, P., Schma, W., & Rosenthal, J. (1999). Therapeutic jurisprudence and the drug treatment court movement: Revolutionising the criminal justice system's response to drug abuse and crime in America. Notre Dame Law Review, 74(2), 439-538.
20. Klotz, J.A. (1996). Sex offenders and the law: New directions. In D.B. Wexler & B.J. Winick (Eds.), The law in a therapeutic key: Developments in therapeutic jurisprudence (pp. 131-144). Carolina: Carolina University Press.
21. Marshall, W.L., Eccles, A., & Barbaree, H.E. (1993). A three-tiered approach to the rehabilitation of incarcerated sex offenders. Behavioural Sciences and the Law, 11, 441-455.
22. McGuire, J. (2002). Criminal sanctions versus psychologically-based interventions with offenders: A comparative empirical analysis. Psychology, Crime and Law, 8, 183-208.
23. McGuire, J. (2000). Can the criminal law ever be therapeutic? Behavioural Sciences and the Law, 18, 413-426.
24. Miller, W.R., & Rollnick, S. (2002). Motivational interviewing: Preparing people for change. New York: Guilford.
25. Prochaska, J., & Norcross, J.C. (1994). Systems of psychotherapy: A transtheoretical analysis. New York: Brooks/Cole.
26. Schopp, R.F. (1993). Therapeutic jurisprudence and the conflicts among values in mental health law. Behavioural Sciences and the Law, 11, 31-45.
27. Slobogin, C. (1995). Therapeutic jurisprudence: Five dilemmas to ponder. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 1(1), 193-219.
28. Slobogin, C., & Fondacaro, M. (2000). Rethinking deprivation of liberty: Possible contributions from therapeutic and ecological jurisprudence. Behavioural Sciences and the Law, 18, 499-516.
29. Ward, T. (2002). Good lives and the rehabilitation of offenders: Promises and problems. Aggression and Violent Behaviour, 7, 1-17.
30. Ward, T., & Stewart, C. (in press-a). Criminogenic needs and human needs: A theoretical model. Psychology, Crime and Law.
31. Ward, T., & Stewart, C. (in press-b). Good lives and the rehabilitation of sexual offenders. In T. Ward., S. Hudson., & R, Laws (Eds.), Sexual deviance: Issues and controversies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
32. Wexler, D.B. (1990). Therapeutic jurisprudence: The law as a therapeutic agent. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
33. Wexler, D.B. (1996). Therapeutic jurisprudence and changing conceptions of legal scholarship. In D.B. Wexler & B.J. Winick (Eds.), The law in a therapeutic key: Developments in therapeutic jurisprudence, (pp. 597-610). Carolina: Carolina University Press.
34. Wexler, D.B. (1998). How the law can use What Works: A therapeutic jurisprudence look at recent research on rehabilitation. Behavioural Sciences and the Law, 15, 368-369.
35. Winick, B.J. (1996). The jurisprudence of therapeutic jurisprudence. In D.B. Wexler & B.J. Winick (Eds.), The law in a therapeutic key: Developments in therapeutic jurisprudence (pp. 645-668). Carolina: Carolina University Press.
36. Winick, B.J. (1998). Sexually violent predator laws and registration and community notification laws: Policy and analysis. Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 4(1/2), 505-570.