Psychological treatments for rehabilitating offenders: Evidence-based practice comes of age

Australian Psychologist

Volumn 37, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 39-47

  Day, Andrew ^a   Howells, Kevin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036522153     PISSN: 00050067     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00050060210001706656     Document Type: Article

References (87)

1. Andrews, D.A. (1995a, October 11-14). Assessing program elements in risk reduction: The Correctional Program Assessment Inventory (CPAI). Paper presented at the Research to Results conference, Ottawa.
2. Andrews, D.A. (1995b). The psychology of criminal conduct and effective treatment. In J. McGnire (Ed.), What works: Reducing reoffending: Guidelines from research and practice. New York: Wiley.
3. Andrews, D.A. (1996). Criminal recidivism is predictable and can be influenced: An update. Unpublished manuscript, Carleton University, Department of Psychology.
4. Andrews, D.A., & Bonta, J., (1994). The Psychology of criminal conduct. Cincinnati: Anderson.
5. Andrews, D.A., Bonta, J., & Hoge, R.D. (1990). Classification for effective rehabilitation: Rediscovering psychology. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 17, 19-52.
6. Andrews, D.A., & Hoge, R.D. (1995). The psychology of criminal conduct and principles of effective prevention and rehabilitation. Forum on Corrections Research, 7(1), n.pag. 〈http://www.csc-scc.gc.ca/text/pblct/forum/eO7/e071j.shtml〉 [1995, January].
7. Andrews, D.A., Zinger, I., Hoge, R.D., Bonta, J., Gendreau, P., & Cullen, F.T. (1990). Does correctional treatment work? A psychologically informed meta-analysis. Criminology, 28, 369-404.
8. Antonowicz, D.H., & Ross, R.R. (1994). Essential components of successful rehabilitation programs for offenders. International Journal of Offender Rehabilitation and Comparative Criminology, 38, 97-104.
9. Australian Bureau of Statistics. (1999). Crime and Justice Statistics, Issue 7. Melbourne: National Centre for Crime and Justice Statistic.
10. Baxter, D.J., Marion, A., & Goguen, B. (1995). Predicting treatment response in correctional settings. Forum on Corrections Research, 7(3), n.pag. 〈http://www.csc-scc.gc.ca/text/pblct /forum/e073/e0731.shtml〉 [1995, September].
11. Boland, F.J., Henderson, K., & Baker, J. (1998). Case needs review: Substance abuse domain (Research Report No. 75). Canada: Correctional Services.
12. Bonta, J. (1995). The responsivity principle and offender rehabilitation. Forum on Corrections Research, 7(3), n.pag. 〈http://www.csc-scc.gc.ca/text/pblct/forum/e073/eO73k.shtml〉 [1995, September].
13. Bonta, J. (1997). Offender rehabilitation: From research to practice (Report No. 1997-01. Ottawa: Department of the Solicitor General of Canada.
14. Brody, S. (1976). The effectiveness of sentencing (Home Office Research Study No. 35). London: HMSO.
15. Brown, M. (1996). Refining the risk concept: Decision context as a factor mediating the relation between risk and program effectiveness. Crime and Delinquency, 42, 435-455.
16. Bubner, S.M. (1999). Utility of motivational screening in the assessment and treatment of substance use with offenders. Unpublished masters thesis, University of South Australia.
17. Clarke, R.G.V. (1985). Jack Tizard Memorial Lecture: Delinquency, environment and intervention. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 26, 505-523.
18. Cleland, C.M., Pearson, F.S., Lipton, D.S., & Yee, D. (1997), Does age make a difference? A meta-analytic approach to reductions in criminal offending for juveniles and adults. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Society of Criminology, San Diego, CA.
19. Cumberland, A.K., & Boyle, G.J. (1997). Psychometric prediction of recidivism: Utility of the risk needs inventory. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 30, 72-86.
20. Edmondson, C.B., & Conger, J.C. (1996). A review of treatment efficacy for individuals with anger problems: Conceptual, assessment and methodological issues. Clinical Psychology Review, 16, 251-275.
21. Frizzell, E. (1993). The Scottish prison service: Changing the culture. Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 32, 203-214.
22. Garrett, C.J. (1985). Effects of residential treatment of adjudicated delinquents: A meta-analysis. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 22, 287-308.
23. Gendreau, P. (1996). Offender rehabilitation: What we know and what needs to be done. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 23, 144-161.
24. Gendreau, P., & Andrews, D.A. (1990). What the meta-analyses of the offender treatment literature tells us about "what works". Canadian Journal of Criminology, 32, 173-184.
25. Gendreau, P., & Andrews, D.A, (1996). The Correctional Program Assessment Inventory 6th edition. Saint John, New Brunswick: University of New Brunswick.
26. Gendreau, P., & Goggin, C. (1996). Principles of effective correctional programming, Forum on Corrections Research, & 38-41.
27. Gendreau, P., & Goggin, C. (1997). Correctional treatment: Accomplishments and realities. In P. Van Voorhis, M. Braswell, & D. Lester (Eds.), Correctional counseling and rehabilitation (3rd ed., pp. 271-280). Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.
28. Gendreau, P., Goggin, C., & Little, T. (1996). Predicting adult offender recidivism: What works! (User Report No. 1996-07). Ottawa: Department of the Solicitor General of Canada.
29. Gendreau, P., Goggin, C., & Paparozzi, M. (1996). Principles of effective assessment for community correction, Federal Probation, 60, 64-71.
30. Goggin, C.E. (1994). Clinical versus actuarial prediction: A meta-analysis. Unpublished manuscript, University of New Brunswick, Saint John, New Brunswick.
31. Goggin, C., Gendreau, P., & Gray, P. (1998). Case needs review: Associates/social interaction domain (Research Report No. 77). Canada: Correctional Services.
32. Gottschalk, R., Davidson, W.S., II, Gensheimer, L.K., & Mayer, J. (1987). Community based interventions. In H.C. Quay (Ed.), Handbook of juvenile delinquency (pp. 266-289). New York: Wiley.
33. Gottschalk, R., Davidson, W.S., II, Mayer, J., & Gensheimer, L.K. (1987). Behavioral approaches with juvenile offenders: A meta-analysis of long term treatment efficacy. In E.K. Morris & C.J. Braukmann (Eds.), Behavioral approaches to crime and delinquency (pp. 399-423). New York: Plenum.
34. Hall, G. (1995). Technology, ideology and prison officer training. Prison Service Journal, 97, 35-44.
35. Hare, R.D. (1991). The Revised Psychopathy Checklist. Toronto: Multi-Health Systems.
36. Hemphill, J.F., Hare, R.D., & Wong, S. (1998). Psychopathy and recidivism: A review. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 3, 139-170.
37. Hollin, C.R. (1993). Advances in the psychological treatment of criminal behavior. Criminal Behavior and Mental Health, 3, 42-57.
38. Hollin, C.R. (1994). Designing effective rehabilitation programmes for young offenders. Psychology, Crime and Law, 1, 193-199.
39. Hollin, C.R. (1995). The meaning and implications of programme integrity. In J. McGuire (Ed.), What works: Effective methods to reduce reoffending (pp. 195-208). Chichester: Wiley.
40. Hollin, C.R. (1999). Treatment programs for offenders. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 22, 361-372.
41. Howells, K., & Day, A. (1999). The rehabilitation of offenders: International perspectives applied to Australian correctional systems. Trends and issues in crime and criminal justice (Vol. 112, pp. 1-6). Australian Institute of Criminology: Canberra.
42. Howells, K., Day, A., Bubner, S., & Jauncey, S. (1999). Assessing offender motivation to address problems with anger. Manuscript submitted for publication.
43. Howells, K., Watt, B., Hall, G., & Baldwin, S. (1997). Developing programs for violent offenders. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 2, 117-128.
44. Izzo, R.L., & Ross, R.R. (1990). Meta-analysis of rehabilitation programs for juvenile delinquents: A brief report. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 17, 134-142.
45. Jones, L. (1997). Developing models for managing treatment integrity and efficacy in a prison-based TC: The Max Glatt centre. In E. Cullen, L. Jones, & R. Woodward (Eds.), Therapeutic communities for offenders (pp. 121-160). Chichester: Wiley.
46. Lipsey, M.W. (1995). What do we learn from 400 studies on the effectiveness of treatment with juvenile delinquents? In J. McGuire (Ed), What works: Reducing reoffending (pp. 63-78). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
47. Lipton, D., Martinson, R., & Wilks, J. (1975). The effectiveness of correctional treatment: A survey of treatment evaluation studies. New York: Praeger.
48. Lipton, D.S., Pearson, F.S., Cleland, C., & Yee, D. (1997). Synthesising correctional treatment outcomes: Preliminary CDATE findings. Presentation to the 5th Annual National Institute of Justice Conference on Research and Evaluation in Criminal Justice, Washington DC.
49. Lloyd, C. Mair, C. and Hough, M. (1994). Explaining reconviction rates: A critical analysis, home Office Research Study No. 136, London: HMSO.
50. Losel, F. (1995a). The efficacy of correctional treatment: A review and synthesis of meta-evaluations. In J. McGuire (Ed.), What works: Reducing reoffending (pp. 79-111). Chichester UK: Wiley.
51. Losel, F. (1995b). Increasing consensus in the evaluation of offender rehabilitation? Lessons from recent research syntheses. Psychology, Crime and Law, 2, 19-39.
52. Losel, F. (1996). Working with young offenders: The impact of meta-analyses. In C.R. Hollin & K. Howells (Eds.), Clinical approaches to working with young offenders (pp. 57-84). Chichester: Wiley.
53. Losel, F., & Koferl, P. (1989). Evaluation research on correctional treatment in West Germany: A meta-analysis. In H. Wegener, F. Losel, & J. Halson (Eds.). Criminal behavior and the justice system: Psychological perspectives (pp. 334-355). New York: Springer-Verlag.
54. MacKenzie, D.L. (1997). Criminal justice and crime prevention. Chapter 9 in National Institute of Justice Report: Preventing Crime: What Works, What Doesn't, What's Promising, A report to the US Congress.
55. MacKenzie, D.L., & Souryal, C. (1994). Multisite evaluation of shock incarceration: Evaluation report. Washington DC: National Institute of Justice.
56. Martinson, R. (1974). What works? Questions and answers about prison reform. The Public Interest, 35, 22-54.
57. Martinson, R. (1979). New findings, new views: A note of caution regarding sentencing reform. Hofstra Law Review, 7, 243-258.
58. McConnaughy, E.A., Prochaska, J.O., & Velicer, W.F. (1989). Stages of change in psychotherapy: A follow up report. Psychotherapy, 26, 494-503.
59. McGuire, J. (1995). What works: Reducing reoffending Guidelines from research and practice. Chichester: Wiley.
60. McGuire, J. (1998). Alternatives to custodial sentences: Effectiveness and potential for development. Memorandum of Evidence to the Home Affairs Committee. London, UK: House of Commons.
61. McGuire, J. (2000). Reducing reoffending: Putting research into practice. Conference of College of Forensic Psychology, Adelaide, Aug 10.
62. McGuire, J., & Priestley, P. (1995). Reviewing "what works": Past, present and future. In J. McGuire (Ed.), What works: Reducing reoffending - Guidelines from research and practice (pp. 3-34). Chichester: Wiley.
63. McMurran, M., & Hollin, C.R. (1997). Series preface. In E. Cullen, L. Jones, & R. Woodward (Eds.), Therapeutic communities for offenders (pp. xiii-xiv). Chichester: Wiley.
64. McMurran, M., Tyler, P., Hogue, T., Cooper, K., Dunseath, W., & McDaid, D. (1998). Measuring motivation to change in offenders. Psychology, Crime and Law, 4, 43-50.
65. Miller, W.R., & Rollnick, S. (1991). Motivational interviewing: Preparing people to change addictive behavior. New York: Guilford.
66. Monahan, J. (1996). Violence prediction: The past twenty and the next twenty years. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 23, 107-120.
67. Moncher, F.J., & Prinz, R.J. (1991). Treatment fidelity in outcome studies. Clinical Psychology Review, 11, 247-266.
68. Motiuk, L. (1998). Using dynamic factors to better predict post-release outcome. Forum on Corrections Research, 10 (3), n.pag. 〈http://www.csc-scc.gc.ca/text/pblct/forum/e103 /e103c.shtml〉 [1998, September].
69. Ogloff, J.R.P., Wong, S., & Greenwood, A. (1990). Treating criminal psychopaths in a therapeutic community program. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 8, 181-190.
70. Pearson F.S., Lipton, D.S., & Cleland, C.M. (1997). Rehabilitative programs in adult corrections: CDATE recta-analyses. Paper presented at the annual meeting of The American Society of Criminology, San Diego, CA.
71. Prochaska, J.O., & DiClemente, C.C. (1986). Toward a comprehensive model of change. In W.R. Miller & N. Heather (Eds.), Treating addictive behaviours: Processes of change. New York: Plenum.
72. Prochaska, J.O., & DiClemente, C.C. (1992). Stages of change in the modification of problem behaviours. Newbury-Park, CA: Sage.
73. Prochaska, J.O., DiClemente, C.C., & Norcross, J.C. (1992). In search of how people change: Applications to addictive behaviours. American Psychologist, 47, 1102-1114.
74. Redondo, S., Garrido, V., Anguera, T., & Luque, E. (1996). Correctional programs in Europe: A pilot study for a meta-evaluation. In G. Davies, S. Lloyd-Bostok, & C. Wilson (Eds.), Psychology, law and criminal justice: International developments in research and practice (pp. 510-519). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
75. Redondo, S., Sancbez-Meca, J., & Garrido, V. (1998). The influence of treatment programmes on the recidivism of juvenile and adult offenders: A European recta-analytic review. Unpublished manuscript, Barcelona: Justice Department.
76. Riittakerttu, K., Laippala, P., & Salonkangas, R.K.R. (1997). Impact of coercion upon treatment outcome. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 20, 311-322.
77. Robinson, D., Porporino, F., & Beal, C. (1998). A review of the literature on personal/emotional factors (Research Report No. 76). Canada: Correctional Services.
78. Serin, R. (1998). Treatment responsivity, intervention and reintegration: A conceptual model. Forum on Corrections Research, 10, 29-32.
79. Serin, R., & Kennedy, S. (1997). Treatment readiness and responsivity: Contributing to effective correctional programming (Research Report No. 54) Canada: Correctional Services.
80. Strand, S., Belfrage, H., Fransson, G., & Levander, S. (1999). Clinical and risk management factors in the risk prediction of mentally disordered offenders: More important than historical data? Legal and Criminological Psychology, 4, 67-76.
81. Terry, K.J., & Mitchell, E.W. (1999). Is motivation necessary? Forensic Update, 59, 7-12.
82. Thornton, D. (1987). Treatment effects on recidivism: A reappraisal of the "nothing works" doctrine. In B.J. McGurk, D.M. Thornton, & M. Williams (Eds.), Applying psychology to imprisonment: Theory and practice (pp. 181-189). London: HMSO.
83. Vennard, J., Sugg, D., & Hedderman, C. (1997). Changing offenders' attitudes and behaviours: What works? (Home Office Research Study No. 171). London: HMSO.
84. Wallace, J.M. (1999). The social ecology of addiction: Race, risk and resilience. Paediatrics, 103, 1122-1127.
85. Waltz, J., Addis, M.E., Koerner, K., & Jacobsen, N.S. (1993). Testing the integrity of a psychotherapy protocol: Assessment of adherence and competence. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61, 620-630.
86. Whitehead, J.T., & Lab, S.P. (1989). A recta-analysis of juvenile correctional treatment. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 26, 276-295.
87. Zamble, E., & Quinsey, V.L. (1997). The Criminal recidivism process. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.