Prognostic factors in the recovery of the ability to walk after stroke

Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases

Volumn 11, Issue 6, 2002, Pages 330-335

  Petrilli, Sabine ^a   Durufle, Aurélie ^a   Nicolas, Benoit ^b   Pinel, Jean François ^a   Kerdoncuff, Valérie ^a   Gallien, Philippe ^a  

^a PONTCHAILLOU UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

^b Clinique Notre Dame de Lourdes   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; APHASIA; ARTICLE; COGNITIVE DEFECT; COMORBIDITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CONVALESCENCE; DEPRESSION; FEMALE; HEMIPLEGIA; HEMISPHERE; HOSPITAL DISCHARGE; HUMAN; INCONTINENCE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MENTAL DISEASE; MIDDLE CEREBRAL ARTERY; NEUROLOGIC DISEASE; PATIENT MOBILITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; SENSORIMOTOR FUNCTION; SENSORY DYSFUNCTION; STROKE; WALKING;

EID: 0036869150     PISSN: 10523057     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1053/jscd.2002.130124     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Di Carlo A, Launer LJ, Breteler MMB, et al. Frequency of stroke in Europe: A collaborative study of population-based cohorts. Neurology 2000;54:S28-S33(suppl 5).
2. Anderson CS, Jamrozik KD, Burvill PW, et al. Determining the incidence of different subtypes of stroke: Results from the Perth Community Stroke Study, 1989-1990. Med J Aust 1993;158:85-89.
3. Dennis MS, Burn JPS, Sandercock PAG, et al. Long-term survival after first-ever stroke: The Oxfordshire Community Stroke Project. Stroke 1993;24:796-800.
4. Bergman L, van der Meulen JHP, Limburg M, et al. Costs of medical care after first ever stroke in the Netherlands. Stroke 1995;26:1830-1836.
5. Dombovy ML, Sandok BA, Basford JR. Rehabilitation for stroke: A review. Stroke 1986;17(3):363-369.
6. Schmidt R, Breteler MMB, Inzitari D, et al. Prognosis with stroke in Europe: A collaborative study of population-based cohorts. Neurology 2000;54:s34-s37 (suppl 5).
7. Barat M. Médecine de rééducation et hémiplégie vasculaire de L'adulte. Conférence de Consensus. Septembre 1996. Limoges, France
8. Jørgensen HS, Nakayama H, Raaschou HO, et al. Recovery of walking function in stroke patients. The Copenhagen stroke study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1995;76:27-32.
9. Jørgensen HS, Nakayama H, Raaschou HO, et al. Outcome and time course of recovery in stroke. Part 1: Outcome. The Copenhagen stroke study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1995;76:399-405.
10. Jørgensen HS, Nakayama H, Raaschou HO, et al. Outcome and time course of recovery in stroke. Part 2: Time course of recovery. The Copenhagen stroke study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1995;76:406-412.
11. Nakayama H, Jørgensen HS, Raaschou HO, et al. Compensation in recovery of upper extremity function after stroke. The Copenhagen stroke study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994;75:852-857.
12. Nakayama H, Jørgensen HS, Raaschou HO, et al. Recovery of upper extremity function in stroke patients. The Copenhagen stroke study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994; 75:394-398.
13. Nakayama H, Jørgensen HS, Raaschou HO, et al. The influence of age on stroke outcome. The Copenhagen stroke study. Stroke 1994;25:808-813.
14. Granger CV, Cotter AC, Hamilton BB, et al. Functional assessment scales: A study of persons after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993;74:133-138.
15. Jongbloed L. Problems of methodological heterogeneity in studies predicting disability after stroke. Stroke 1990; 21:II32-II34 (suppl II).
16. Kwakkel G, Wagenaar RC, Kollen BJ, et al. Predicting disability in stroke - A critical review of the literature. Age Ageing 1996;25(6):479-489.
17. Petit H. Rééducation et facteurs de pronostic de l'hémiplégie vasculaire. Quel est l'impact des facteurs de pronostics initiaux de l'hémiplégie vasculaire sur l'efficacité et les indications de la rééducation? Ann Réadapt Med Phys 1997;40:113-120.
18. de Haan R, Horn J, Limburg M, et al. A comparison of five stroke scales with measures of disability, handicap, and quality of life. Stroke 1993;24:1178-1181.
19. Orgogozo JM. Advantages and disadvantages of neurological scales. Cerebrovasc Dis 1998;8:2-7 (suppl 2).
20. Wade DT, Wood VA, Heller A, et al. Walking after stroke. Measurement and recovery over the first three months. Scand J Rehabil Med 1987;19:25-30.
21. Skillbeck CE, Wade DT, Hewer RL, et al. Recovery after stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1983;46:5-8.
22. Dartigues JF, Krassinine G, Commenges D, et al. Analyse longitudinale de la récupération de la marche après une hémiplégie par accident vasculaire cérébral. Ann Réadapt Med Phys 1985;27:207-214.
23. Feigenson JS, MacDowell FH, Meese P, et al. Factors influencing outcome and length of stay in a stroke rehabilitation unit. Part 1: Analysis of 248 unscreened patients, medical and functional prognostic indicators. Stroke 1977;8:651-656.
24. Mayo NE, Korner-Bitensky NA, Becker R. Recovery time of independent function post-stroke. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1991;70:5-12.
25. Brun V, LaBauge P, Robinson A, et al. Les facteurs influençant la reprise de la marche après hémiplégie vasculaire. Ann Réadapt Med Phys 1996;39:191-199.
26. Friedman PJ. Gait recovery after hemiplegic stroke. Int Disabil Studies 1990;12:119-122.
27. Perrigot M, Bergeco C, Fakacs C, et al. Hémiplégie vasculaire. Bilan et éléments du pronostic de la récupération. Ann Med Phys 1980;23:229-241.
28. Chae J, Johnston M, Kim H, et al. Admission motor impairment as a predictor of physical disability after stroke rehabilitation. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1995;74: 218-223.
29. Eyssette M. Dans quels délais se fait la reprise de la marche et faut-il poursuivre la rééducation au delà du 13éme mois? Ann Réadapt Med Phys 1997;40:131-137.
30. Kauhanen ML, Korpelainen JT, Hiltunen P, et al. Poststroke depression correlates with cognitive impairment and neurological deficits. Stroke 1999;30:1875-1880.
31. Kotila M, Numminen H, Waltimo O, et al. Depression after stroke. Results of the Finnstroke study. Stroke 1998; 29:368-372.
32. van de Weg FB, Kuik DJ, Lankhorst GJ. Post-stroke depression and functional outcome: A cohort study investigating the influence of depression on functional recovery from stroke. Clin Rehabil 1999;13(3):268-272.