Systematic errors in middle-aged women's estimates of energy intake: Comparing three self-report measures to total energy expenditure from doubly labeled water

Annals of Epidemiology

Volumn 12, Issue 8, 2002, Pages 577-586

  Hebert, James R ^a   Ebbeling, Cara B ^b   Matthews, Charles E ^a   Hurley, Thomas G ^a   MA, Yunsheng ^c   Druker, Susan ^c   Clemow, Lynn ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^b BOSTON CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^d ROBERT WOOD JOHNSON MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

Bias; Diet; Doubly Labeled Water; Nutrition Assessment; Personality Assessment; Questionnaires; Social Desirability; Women

Indexed keywords

WATER;

ADULT; AGED; ANALYTICAL ERROR; ARTICLE; BODY COMPOSITION; BODY MASS; CALORIC INTAKE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EDUCATION; ENERGY EXPENDITURE; FEMALE; HUMAN; LINEAR REGRESSION ANALYSIS; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; SCORING SYSTEM; SELF REPORT; SOCIAL DESIRABILITY; SOCIOECONOMICS;

ADULT; AGED; ANTHROPOMETRY; BIAS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); ENERGY INTAKE; FEMALE; FOOD HABITS; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS; MASSACHUSETTS; MENTAL RECALL; MIDDLE AGED; NUTRITION ASSESSMENT; QUESTIONNAIRES; SELF DISCLOSURE; WATER; WOMEN;

EID: 0036865083     PISSN: 10472797     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1047-2797(01)00297-6     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Hebert J.R., Clemow L., Pbert L., Ockene I.S., Ockene J.K. Social desirability bias in dietary self-report may compromise the validity of dietary intake measures. Int J Epidemiol. 24:1995;389-398.
2. Hebert J.R., Ma Y., Clemow L., Ockene I.S., Saperia G., Stanek E.J.et al. Gender differences in social desirability and social approval bias in dietary self report. Am J Epidemiol. 146:1997;1046-1055.
3. Hebert JR, Ma Y, Ebbeling CB, Matthews CE, Ockene IS. Self-Report Data. Compliance in Healthcare and Research. Armonk, NY: Futura, 2001:163-179.
4. Hebert J.R., Peterson K.E., Hurley T.G., Stoddard A.M., Cohen N., Field A.E.et al. The effect of social desirability trait on self-reported dietary measures among multi-ethnic female health center employees. Ann Epidemiol. 11:2001;417-427.
5. Hebert J.R., Hurley T.G., Chiraboga D.E., Barone J. A comparison of selected nutrient intakes derived from three diet assessment methods used in a low-fat maintenance trial. Public Health Nutr. 1:1998;207-214.
6. Buzzard I.M., Faucett C.L., Jeffery R.W., McBane L., McGovern P., Baxter J.S.et al. Monitoring dietary change in a low-fat diet intervention study. advantages of using 24-hour dietary recalls vs food records J Am Diet Assoc. 96:1996;574-579.
7. Wu M.L., Whittemore A.S., Jung D.L. Errors in reported dietary intakes. I. short-term recall Am J Epidemiol. 124:1986;826-835.
8. Flegal K.M., Keyl P.M., Nieto F.J. Differential misclassification arising from nondifferential errors in exposure measurement. Am J Epidemiol. 134:1991;1233-1244.
9. Hebert J.R., Ockene I.S., Hurley T.G., Luippold R., Well A.D., Harmatz M.G. Development and testing of a seven-day dietary recall. J Clin Epidemiol. 50:1997;925-937.
10. Patterson R.E., Kristal A.R., Coates R.J., Tylvasky F.A., Ritenbaugh C., Van Horn L.et al. Low-fat diet practices of older women. prevalence and implications for dietary assessment J Am Diet Assoc. 96:1996;670-679.
11. Speakman J.R., Nair K.S., Goran M.I. Revised equations for calculating CO2 production from doubly labeled water in humans. Am J Physiol. 264:1993;E912-E917.
12. Black A.E., Prentice A.M., Coward W.A. Use of food quotients to predict respiratory quotients for the doubly labeled water method of measuring energy expenditure. Hum Nutr:Clin Nutr. 40C:1986;381-391.
13. Surrao J., Sawaya A.L., Dallal G.E., Tsay R., Roberts S.B. Use of food quotients in human doubly labeled water studies. comparable results obtained with 4 widely used food intake methods J Am Diet Assoc. 98:1998;1015-1020.
14. Scrimgeour C.M., Rollo M.M., Mudambo M.K.T., Handley L.L., Prosser S.J. A simplified method for deuterium/hydrogen isotope ratio measurements on water samples of biological origin. Biomed Mass Spect. 22:1993;383-387.
15. Wong W.W., Lee L.S., Klein P.D. Deuterium and oxygen-18 measurements on microliter samples of urine, plasma, saliva and human milk. Am J Clin Nutr. 45:1987;905-913.
16. Weir J.B. New methods for calculating metabolic rate with special reference to protein metabolism. J Physiol. 109:1949;1-9.
17. Buzzard I.M., Price K.S., Warren R.A. Considerations for selecting nutrient-calculation software. evaluation of the nutrient database Am J Clin Nutr. 54:1991;7-9.
18. McDowell M.A., Briefel R.R., Alaimo K., Bischof A.M., Caughman C.R., Carroll M.D.et al. Energy and macronutrient intakes of persons ages 2 months and over in the United States. Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, Phase 1, 1988-1991 Vital and Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 255:1994;1-24.
19. Wolfe R.R. Radioactive and Stable Isotope Tracers in Biomedicine - Principles and Practice of Kinetic Analysis. 1992;Wiley-Liss, Inc, NY.
20. Smucker R., Block G., Coyle L., Harvin A., Kessler L. A dietary and risk factor questionnaire and analysis for personal computers. Am J Epidemiol. 129:1989;445-449.
21. Casperson C.J. A collection of physical activity questionnaires for health-related research. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Med Sci Sports Exerc. 29(suppl.):1997;146-152.
22. Heyward V.H., Stolarczyk L.M. Applied Body Composition Assessment. 1996;Human Kinetics, Champaign, IL.
23. Sheng H.-P., Huggins R.A. A review of body composition studies with emphasis on total body water and fat. Am J Clin Nutr. 32:1979;630-647.
24. Crowne D.P., Marlowe D. A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. J Consult Clin Psychol. 24:1960;349-354.
25. Maher B. A reader's, writer's, and reviewer's guide to assessing research reports in clinical psychology. J Consult Clin Psychol. 46:1978;835-838.
26. Mischel W. Test-Taking Attitudes and Response Biases. Personality & Assessment. 1968;549-554 John Wiley & Sons, New York.
27. Crowne D.P. The experimental study of personality. 1979;Erl-baum, Hillsdale NJ.
28. Anastasi A. Psychological Testing. 1988;MacMillan Publ. Co, New York.
29. Loo R. A psychometric evaluation of the General Decision-Making Style Inventory. Pers Individ Differ. 29:2000;895-905.
30. Evans W.J. TI Construct validity of the Attitudes About Reality Scale. Psychol. Rep. 86:2000;738-744.
31. Larsen K.S., Martin H.J., Ettinger R.H., Nelson J. Approval seeking, social cost, and agression. a scale and some dynamics J Psychol. 94:1976;3-11.
32. Thaw J., Efran J. The relationship of the Marlowe-Crowne Scale and its components to defensive preferences. J of Personality Assessment. 43:1967;406-410.
33. Martin H.J. A revised measure of approval motivation and its relationship to social desirability. J Pers Assess. 48:1984;508-516.
34. SAS SAS/STAT Software. Changes and Enhancements through Release 8.01(Guide):2001;SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC.
35. Patterson R.E., Kristal A.R., Tinker L.F., Carter R.A., Bolton M.P., Agurs-Collins T. Measurement characteristics of the Women's Health Initiative food frequency questionnaire. Ann Epidemiol. 9:1999;178-187.
36. Hebert J.R., Ebbeling C.B., Hurley T.G., Ma Y., Clemow L., Olendzki B.C.et al. Change in diet and body mass following intensive intervention in early-stage breast cancer. J Am Diet Assoc. 101:2001;421-428.
37. Kuczmarski R.J., Flegal K.M., Campbell S.M., Johnson C.L. Increasing prevalence of overweight among US adults. The National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys, 1960 to 1991. JAMA. 272:1994;205-211.
38. NHLBI Clinical Guidelines On the Identification, Evaluation, and Treatment of Overweight and Obesity in Adults. the Evidence Report:1998;National Institutes of Health, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Bethesda, MD.
39. Edwards A.L. Social desirability or acquiescence in the MMPI? A case study with the SD scale. J Abnormal Social Psychol. 63:1961;351-359.
40. Edwards A.L. The social desirability variable in personality assessment and research. 1957;Dryden, New York.
41. Marlowe D., Crowne D.P. Social desirability and responses to perceived situational demands. J Consult Clin Psychol. 25:1961;109-115.
42. Lichtman S.W., Pisarska K., Berman E.R., Pestone M., Dowling H., Offenbacher E.et al. Discrepancy between self-reported and actual caloric intake and exercise in obese subjects. N Engl J Med. 327:1992;1893-1898.
43. Seim H.C., Fiola J.A. A comparison of attitudes and behaviors of men and women todary food and dieting. Pract Res J. 10:1990;57-63.
44. Larsen K.S., Martin H.J., Giles H. Anticipated social cost and interpersonal accommodation. Hum Commun Res. 3:1977;303-308.
45. Shulman A., Silverman I. Social desirability and need approval. Some paradoxical data and a conceptual reevaluation Br J Soc Clin Psychol. 13:1974;27-32.
46. Evans R.G. The relationship of the Marlowe-Crowne Scale and its components to defensive preferences. J Pers Assess. 43:1979;406-410.
47. Black A.E., Cole T.J. Within- and between-subject variation in energy expenditure measured by the doubly labelled water technique. Implications for validating reported dietary energy intake Eur J Clin Nutr. 54:2000;386-394.
48. Dwyer J.T., Krall E.A., Coleman K.A. The problem of memory in nutritional epidemiology research. J Am Diet Assoc. 87:1987;1509-1512.
49. Smith A.F. Cognitive psychological issues of relevance to the validity of dietary reports. Eur J Clin Nutr. 47(supl):1993;6-18.
50. Smith A.F., Jobe J.B., Mingay D.J. Question-induced cognitive biases in reports of dietary intake by college men and women. Health Psychol. 10:1991;244-251.
51. Jobe J.B., Mingay D.J. Cognitive research improves questionnaires. Am J Public Health. 79:1989;1053-1055.
52. Krebs-Smith S.M., Heimendinger J., Subar A.F., Patterson B.H., Pivonka E. Using food frequency questionnaires to estimate fruit and vegetable intake. association between the number of questions and total intakes J Nutr Educ. 27:1995;80-85.
53. Borrelli R., Cole T.J., DiBiase G., Contaldo F. Some statistical considerations on dietary assessment methods. Eur J Clin Nutr. 43:1989;453-463.
54. Buzzard IM. Estimating compliance bias and other sources of error in assessing dietary intake in a low fat diet intervention study, Second International Conference on Dietary Assessment Methods, Boston, MA. 1995.
55. Posner B.M., Martin-Munley S.S., Smigelski C., Cupples L.A., Cobb J.L., Schaefer E.et al. Comparison of techniques for estimating nutrient intake. The Framingham Study Epidemiology. 3:1992;171-177.
56. Taren D.L., Tobar M., Hill A., Howell W., Shisslak C., Bell I.et al. The association of energy intake bias with psychological scores of women. Euro J Clin Nutr. 53:1999;570-578.
57. Hertz-Picciotto I., Swan S.H., Neutra R.R. Reporting bias and mode of interview in a study of adverse pregnancy outcomes and water consumption. Epidemiology. 3:1992;104-112.
58. Dolan P., Kind P. Inconsistency and health state valuations. Soc Sci Med. 42:1996;609-615.
59. Aquilino W.S. Telephone versus face-to-face interviewing for household drug use surveys. Int J Addict. 27:1992;71-91.
60. Leighton J., Neugut A.I., Block G. A comparison of face-to-face food frequency interviews with telephone interviews and self-administered questionnaires. Am J Epidemiol. 128:1988;891.
61. Hebert J.R., Gupta P.C., Bhonsle R.B., Murti P.R., Mehta H., Verghese F.et al. Development and testing of a quantitative food frequency questionnaire for use in Kerala, India. Public Health Nutr. 1:1998;123-130.
62. Hebert J.R., Gupta P.C., Bhonsle R.B., Sinor P.N., Mehta H., Mehta F.S. Development and testing of a quantitative food frequency questionnaire for use in Gujarat, India. Public Health Nutr. 2:1999;39-50.
63. Hebert J.R., Ebbeling C.B., Ockene I.S., Ma Y., Rider L., Merriam P.A.et al. A dietitian-delivered group nutrition program leads to reductions in dietary fat, serum cholesterol, and body weight. findings from the Worcester Area Trial for Counseling in Hyperlipidemia (WATCH) J Am Diet Assoc. 99:1999;544-552.