Comparison between radiological and artificial neural network diagnosis in clinical screening

Physiological Measurement

Volumn 23, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 727-739

  Degenhard, A ^a,c   Tanner, C ^a,b   Hayes, C ^a,d   Hawkes, D J ^a,b   Leach, M O ^a   Eeles, R A ^g   Turnbull, L W ^g   Dixon, A K ^g,g   Brown, J ^g   Caines, R J ^g   Coulthard, A ^g   Dixon, J M ^g   Easton, D F ^g   Evans, D G R ^g   Gilbert, F G ^g   Hawnaur, J ^f   Kessar, P ^e   Lakhani, S ^g   Liney, G ^g   Moss, S M ^g   Padhani, A P ^g   Pointon, L J ^g   Sydenham, M ^g   Walker, L G ^g   Warren, R M L ^g   Crothers, G ^g   Walker, C P ^g   Jones, A ^g   Slack, N ^g   Britton, P ^g   Sheppard, D G ^g   Walsh, J ^g   Whitehouse, G ^g   Teh, W ^g   Rankin, S ^g   Boggis, C ^g   Potterton, J ^g   McLean, L ^g   Gordon, P A L ^g   Rubin, C ^g   Haites, N E ^g   Morrison, P ^g   Cole, T ^g   Rayter, Z ^g   Donaldson, A ^g   Shere, M ^g   Rankin, J ^g   Goudie, D ^g   Steel, C M ^g   Davidson, R ^g   Chu, C ^g   Ellis, I ^g   Mackay, J ^g   Hodgson, S V ^g   Homfray, T ^g   Douglas, F ^g   Quarrell, O W ^g   Eccles, D M ^g   Houlston, R S ^g   more..

^a INSTITUTE OF CANCER RESEARCH   (United Kingdom)

^b GUY S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^c BIELEFELD UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^d SIEMENS AG   (Germany)

^e ROYAL BROMPTON HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^f MANCHESTER ROYAL INFIRMARY   (United Kingdom)

^g NONE

Author keywords

Artificial neural networks; Clinical imaging studies; Dynamic contrast enhanced imaging; Magnetic resonance imaging; Radiological diagnosis of breast cancer; Receiver operating characteristic curves

Indexed keywords

DIAGNOSIS; DISEASES; MEDICAL IMAGING; NEURAL NETWORKS;

BREAST CANCER; CLINICAL IMAGING STUDY; DYNAMIC CONTRAST-ENHANCED IMAGING; GENETIC RISKS; IMAGING PROTOCOL; NETWORK DIAGNOSIS; NEURAL-NETWORKS; RADIOLOGICAL DIAGNOSE OF BREAST CANCER; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC CURVES; SCORING SCHEMES;

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;

ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; BREAST CANCER; CANCER SCREENING; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIODIAGNOSIS; RADIOLOGICAL PARAMETERS; RADIOLOGIST; SCORING SYSTEM; BREAST TUMOR; CLINICAL TRIAL; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; MULTICENTER STUDY; PATHOLOGY; RADIOGRAPHY;

BREAST NEOPLASMS; COHORT STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NEURAL NETWORKS (COMPUTER);

EID: 0036853726     PISSN: 09673334     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/0967-3334/23/4/311     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Abdolmaleki P, Buadu L D and Naderimansh H 2001 Feature extraction and classification of breast cancer on dynamic magnetic resonance imaging using artificial neural network Cancer Lett. 171 183-91
2. Abdolmaleki P, Buadu L D, Naderimansh H, Murayama S, Murakami J, Hashiguchi N, Yabuuchi H and Masuda K 1997 Neural network analysis of breast cancer from MRI findings Radiat. Medi. 15 283-93
3. Bishop C M 1995 Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition (Oxford: Clarendon)
4. Deco G and Obradovic D 1997 An Information-Theoretic Approach to Neural Computing (New York: Springer)
5. Floyd C E, Lo J Y, Yun A J, Sullivan D C and Kornguth P J 1994 Prediction of breast cancer malignancy using an artificial neural network Cancer 74 11
6. Fogel D B, Wasson E C, Boughton E M and Porto V W 1997 Evolving artificial neural networks for screening features from mammograms Radiat. Med. 15 283-93
7. Gilhuijs K G A and Giger M L 1998 Computerized analysis of breast lesions in three dimensions using dynamic magnetic-resonance imaging Med. Phys. 25 1647
8. Haykins S 1994 Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Foundation (London: Macmillan)
9. Heywang S H, Hahn D, Schmidt H, Krischke I, Eiermann W, Bassermann R and Lissner J 1986 MR imaging of the breast using gadolinium-DTPA J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 10 199
10. Heywang-Köbrunner S H and Beck R 1997 Contrast-Enhanced MRI of the Breast (Berlin: Springer)
11. Hosmer D W and Lemeshow S 2000 Applied Logistic Regression (New York: Wiley)
12. Kelcz F, Santyr G E, Cron G O and Mongin S J 1996 Application of a quantitative model to differentiate benign from malignant breast lesions detected by dynamic, gadolinium-enhanced MRI J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 6 743
13. Lucht R E A, Knopp M V and Brix G 2001 Classification of signal-time curves from dynamic MR mammography by neural networks Magn. Reson. Imaging 19 51
14. Markopoulos C, Koukos E, Koufopoulos K, Kyriakou V and Gogas J 2001 Use of artificial neural networks (computer analysis) in the diagnosis of microcalcifications on mammography Eur J. Radiol. 39 60-5
15. Miller R G 1974 The Jackknife - A Review Biometrika 61 1
16. Stone M 1974 Cross-validatory choice and assessment of statistical predictions J. R. Stat. Soc. B 36 111
17. UK MRI Breast Screening Study Advisory Group, Imaging Advisors and Staff 2000 Magnetic resonance imaging screening in women at genetic risk of breast cancer: Imaging and analysis protocol for the UK multicentre study Magn. Reson. Imaging 18 765
18. Williams M B, Pisano E D, Schnall M D and Fajardo L L 1998 Future directions in imaging of breast diseases Radiology 206 297
19. Wu Y, Giger M L, Doi K, Vyborny C J, Schmidt R A and Metz C E 1993 Artificial neural networks in mammography: Application to decision making in the diagnosis of breast cancer Radiology 187 81