Study of homeosis in the flower of Philodendron (Araceae): A qualitative and quantitative approach

Annals of Botany

Volumn 90, Issue 5, 2002, Pages 579-592

  Barabé, Denis ^a   Lacroix, Christian ^b   Jeune, Bernard ^c  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND   (Canada)

^c SORBONNE UNIVERSITÉ   (France)

Author keywords

Development; Inflorescence; Positional information; Sex determination

Indexed keywords

DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY; FLORAL TRAIT;

ARTICLE; FLOWER; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; HISTOLOGY; PHILODENDRON; PHYSIOLOGY; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

FLOWERS; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; PHILODENDRON;

ARACEAE; PHILODENDRON;

EID: 0036844359     PISSN: 03057364     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcf225     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Barabé D, Bertrand C. 1996. Organogénie florale des genres Culcasia et Cercestis (Araceae). Canadian Journal of Botany 74: 898-908.
2. Barabé D, Labrecque M. 1983. Vascularisation de la fleur de Calla palustris (Araceae). Canadian Journal of Botany 61: 1718-1726.
3. Barabé D, Lacroix C. 1999. Homeosis, morphogenetic gradient and the determination of floral identity in the inflorescences of Philodendron solimoesense (Araceae). Plant Systematics and Evolution 219: 243-261.
4. Barabé D, Lacroix C. 2000. Homeosis in the flower of the Araceae: The case of Philodendron melinonii (Araceae). Annals of Botany 86: 479-491.
5. Barabé D, Lacroix C. 2001. Aspects of floral development in Philodendron grandifolium and Philodendron megalophyllum (Araceae). International Journal of Plant Sciences 162: 47-57.
6. Barabé D, Lacroix C, Jeune B. 1997. On the presence of a morphogenetic gradient in the inflorescence of Philodendron fragrantissimum (Araceae). Flowering Newsletter 24: 10-17.
7. Barabé D, Lacroix C, Jeune B. 2000. Development of the inflorescence and flower of Philodendron fragrantissimum (Araceae): A qualitative and quantitative study. Canadian Journal of Botany 78: 557-576.
8. Barahona Carvajal ME. 1977. Estudio morphologico comparativo de las inflorescencias de dos especies de Araceae: Anthurium denudatum Engler y Philodendron radiatum Schot. Revista di Biologia Tropical 25: 301-333.
9. Becker A, Winter K-U, Meyer B, Saedler H, Theissen G. 2000. MADS-box gene diversity in seed plants 300 million years ago. Molecular Biology and Evolution 17: 1425-1434.
10. Boubes C, Barabé D. 1996. Développement des inflorescences et des fleurs du Philodendron acatatum (Araceae). Canadian Journal of Botany 74: 909-918.
11. Croat TB. 1997. A revision of Philodendron subgenus Philodendron (Araceae) for Mexico and Central America. Annals of Missouri Botanical Garden 84: 311-704.
12. Endress PK. 1996. Diversity and Evolutionary Biology of Tropical Flowers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,
13. Engler A, Krause K. 1912. Araceae-Philodendroideae-Philodendreae. In: Engler A, ed. Das Planzenreich. Regni Vegetabilis Conspectus, 1-134. IV. 23Da. Heft 55. Leipzig: Engelmann. Reprinted 1966 (J. Cramer).
14. Frohlich MW, Meyerowitz EM. 1997. The search for flower homeotic gene homologs in basal angiosperms and gnetales: A potential new source of data on the evolutionary origin of flowers. International Journal of Plant Sciences 158 (Suppl. 6): S131-S142.
15. Guédès M. 1979. Morphology of Seed-plants. Vaduz: J. Cramer.
16. Kirchoff BK. 1991. Homeosis in the flowers of Zingiberales. American Journal of Botany 78: 833-837.
17. Kramer EM, Irish VF. 2000. Evolution of the petal and stamen developmental programs: Evidence from comparative studies of the lower eudicots and basal angiosperms. International Journal of Plant Science 161 (Suppl. 6): S29-S40.
18. Kramer EM, Doril RL, Irish VF. 1998. Molecular evolution of genes controlling petal and stamen development: Duplication and divergence within the APETALA3 and PISTILLATA MADS-box gene lineages. Genetics 149: 765-783.
19. Lecocq FM. 1972. Le Begonia tuberhybrida Voss. Étude Morphologique et Biologique. PhD Thesis, Université de Nantes, France.
20. Lehmann N, Sattler R. 1992. Irregular floral development in Calla palustris (Araceae) and the concept of homeosis. American Journal of Botany 79: 1145-1157.
21. Lehmann N, Sattler R. 1993. Homeosis in floral development of Sanguinaria canadensis and S. canadensis 'Multiplex' (Papaveraceae). American Journal of Botany 80: 1323-1335.
22. Lehmann N, Sattler R. 1996. Staminate floral development in Begonia cucullata var. hookeri and three double-flowering Begonia cultivars, examples of homeosis. Canadian Journal of Botany 74: 1729-1741.
23. MacIntyre JB, Lacroix C. 1996. Comparative development of perianth and androecial primordia of the single flower and the homeotic double-flowered mutant in Hibiscus rosa-sinensis (Malvaceae). Canadian Journal of Botany 74: 1871-1882.
24. Mabberlay DJ, Hay A. 1994. Homeosis, canalization, decanalization, 'characters' and angiosperms origins. Edinburgh Journal of Botany 51: 117-126.
25. Mayo SJ. 1986. Systematics of Philodendron Schott (Araceae) With Special Reference to Inflorescence Characters. PhD Thesis, University of Reading, UK.
26. Mayo SJ. 1989. Observations of gynoecial structure in Philodendron (Araceae). Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 100: 139-172.
27. Mayo SJ, Bogner J, Boyce PC. 1997. The Genera of Araceae. Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens.
28. Mouradov A, Glassick TV, Hamdorf BA, Murphy LC, Marla SS, Yang Y, Teasdale RD. 1998. Family of MADS-Box genes expressed early in male and female reproductive structures of Montery Pine. Plant Physiology 117: 55-61.
29. Purugganan MD. 1998. The molecular evolution of development. BioEssays 20: 700-711.
30. Ronse Decraene LP, Smets EF. 2001. Staminodes: Their morphological and evolutionary significance. Botanical Review 67: 351-402.
31. Rohde A, Grunau C, De Beck L, Van Montagu M, Rosenthal A, Boerjan W. 1999. Carpel, a new Arabidopsis epi-mutant of the SUPERMAN gene: Phenotypic analysis and DNA methylation status. Plant Cell Physiology 40: 961-972.
32. Running MP, Fletcher JC, Meyerowitz EM. 1998. The WIGGUM gene is required for proper regulation of floral meristem size in Arabidopsis. Development 125: 2545-2553.
33. Sattler R. 1988. Homeosis in plants. American Journal of Botany 75: 1606-1617.
34. Sattler R. 1994. Homology, homeosis and process morphology in plants. In: Hall BK, ed. Homology: The Hierarchical Basis of Comparative Biology. London: Academic Press, 423-475.
35. Sawhney VK. 1992. Floral mutants in tomato: Development, physiology, and evolutionary implications. Canadian Journal of Botany 70: 701-707.
36. Tucker SC. 1992. The role of floral development in studies of legume evolution. Canadian Journal of Botany 70: 692-700.
37. Vogel S. 1977. Nektarien und ihre ökologische Bedeutung. Apidologie 8: 321-335.
38. Winter K-U, Becket A, Münster T, Kim JT, Saedler H, Theissen G. 1999. MADS-box genes reveal that gnetophytes are more closely related to conifers than to flowering plants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 96: 7342-7347.