Standardization of dietary intake measurements by nonlinear calibration using short-term reference data

American Journal of Epidemiology

Volumn 156, Issue 9, 2002, Pages 862-870

  Hoffmann, Kurt ^a   Kroke, Anja ^a   Klipstein Grobusch, Kerstin ^a   Boeing, Heiner ^a  

^a GERMAN INSTITUTE OF HUMAN NUTRITION   (Germany)

Author keywords

Calibration; Diet; Epidemiologic methods; Questionnaires

Indexed keywords

DIET;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CALIBRATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; DATA ANALYSIS; DIETARY INTAKE; EPIDEMIOLOGICAL DATA; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MEASUREMENT; MULTICENTER STUDY; NUTRITION; QUESTIONNAIRE; REFERENCE VALUE; STANDARD;

CALIBRATION; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; DIET RECORDS; EPIDEMIOLOGIC METHODS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; REFERENCE STANDARDS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RESEARCH DESIGN;

EID: 0036839702     PISSN: 00029262     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwf121     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Willett W, Lenart E. Reproducibility and validity of food-frequency questionnaires. In: Willett W, ed. Nutritional Epidemiology. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press, 1998:101-47.
2. Greenland S. Invited commentary: A critical look at some popular meta-analytic methods. Am J Epidemiol 1994;140:290-6.
3. Eysenck HJ. Meta-analysis and its problems. BMJ 1994;309:789-92.
4. Eysenck HJ. Meta-analysis or best-evidence synthesis? J Eval Clin Pract 1995;1:29-36.
5. Poole C, Greenland S. Random-effects meta-analyses are not always conservative. Am J Epidemiol 1999;150:469-75.
6. Slimani N, Deharveng G, Charrondière RU, et al. Structure of the standardized computerized 24-h diet recall interview used as reference method in the 22 centers participating in the EPIC project. European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 1999;58:251-66.
7. Slimani N, Ferrari P, Ocke M, et al. Standardization of the 24-hour diet recall calibration method used in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC): General concepts and preliminary results. Eur J Clin Nutr 2000;54:900-17.
8. Stram DO, Hankin JH, Wilkens LR, et al. Calibration of the dietary questionnaire for a multiethnic cohort in Hawaii and Los Angeles. Am J Epidemiol 2000;151:358-70.
9. Rosner B, Willett WC, Spiegelman D. Correction of logistic regression relative risk estimates and confidence intervals for systematic within-person measurement error. Stat Med 1989;8:1051-69.
10. Spiegelman D, McDermott A, Rosner B. Regression calibration method for correcting measurement-error bias in nutritional epidemiology. Am J Clin Nutr 1997;65(suppl):1179S-86S.
11. Kroke A, Klipstein-Grobusch K, Voss S, et al. Validation of a self-administered food frequency questionnaire administered in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) Study: Comparison of energy, protein, and macronutrient intakes estimated with the doubly labeled water, urinary nitrogen, and repeated 24-h dietary recall methods. Am J Clin Nutr 1999;70:439-47.
12. Nusser SM, Carriquiry AL, Dodd KW, et al. A semiparametric transformation approach to estimating usual daily intake distributions. J Am Stat Assoc 1996;91:1440-9.
13. Nusser SM, Fuller WA, Guenther PM. Estimating usual dietary intake distributions: Adjusting for measurement error and non-normality in 24-hour food intake data. In: Lyberg LE, Biemer P, Collins M, et al, eds. Survey Measurement and Process Quality. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, 1997:689-709.
14. Guenther PM, Kott PS, Carriquiry AL. Development of an approach for estimating usual nutrient intake distributions at the population level. J Nutr 1997;127:1106-12.
15. Iowa State University. A User's Guide to C-SIDE (Software for Intake Distribution Estimation), Version 1.0. Ames, IA: Iowa State University, 1996. (Technical report 96-TR 31).
16. Box GEP, Cox DR. An analysis of transformation. J R Stat Soc (B) 1964;26:211-52.
17. Montgomery DC, Peck EA. Introduction to Linear Regression Analysis. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, 1992.
18. Kimanani EK. Bioanalytical calibration curves: Proposal for statistical criteria. J Pharm Biomed Anal 1998;16:1117-24.
19. Hartung J. Non-negative minimum biased invariant estimation in variance component models. Ann Stat 1981;9:278-92.
20. Howe GR, Hirohata T, Hislop TG, et al. Dietary factors and risk of breast cancer: Combined analysis of case-control studies. J Natl Cancer Inst 1990;82:561-9.
21. Steinmetz KA, Potter JD. Vegetables, fruit, and cancer. I. Epidemiology. Cancer Causes Control 1991;2:325-57.
22. Glasziou PP, Mackerras DE. Vitamin A supplementation in infectious diseases: Meta-analysis. BMJ 1993;306:366-70.
23. Jacobs DR, Marquart L, Slavin J, et al. Whole-grain intake and cancer: An expanded review and meta-analysis. Nutr Cancer 1998;30:85-96.
24. Law MR, Morris JK. By how much does fruit and vegetable consumption reduce the risk of ischaemic heart disease? Eur J Clin Nutr 1998;52:549-56.
25. Hunter DJ, Spiegelman D, Adami HO, et al. Cohort studies of fat intake and the risk of breast cancer - A pooled analysis. N Engl J Med 1996;334:356-61.
26. Smith-Warner SA, Spiegelman D, Adami HO, et al. Types of dietary fat and breast cancer: A pooled analysis of cohort studies. Int J Cancer 2001;92:767-74.
27. Smith-Warner SA, Spiegelman D, Shiaw-Shyuan Y, et al. Intake of fruits and vegetables and risk of breast cancer: A pooled analysis of cohort studies. JAMA 2001;285:769-76.
28. Riboli E. Nutrition and cancer: Background and rationale of the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC). Ann Oncol 1992;3:783-91.
29. Riboli E, Kaaks R. The EPIC project: Rationale and study design. Int J Epidemiol 1997;26(suppll):S6-S14.
30. Riboli E, Kaaks R. Invited commentary: The challenge of multicenter cohort studies in the search for diet and cancer links. Am J Epidemiol 2000;151:371-4.
31. Kolonel LN, Henderson BE, Hankin JH, et al. A multiethnic cohort in Hawaii and Los Angeles: Baseline characteristics. Am J Epidemiol 2000;151:346-57.