2n behavioral experiments using Pareto optimal choice sets

Statistica Sinica

Volumn 12, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 1085-1092

  Raghavarao, Damaraju ^a   Zhang, Daozhi ^b  

^a TEMPLE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b PURDUE PHARMA L P   (United States)

Author keywords

Balanced incomplete block design; Choice set; Connected main effect plan; Information per profile; Pareto optimal design

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036822857     PISSN: 10170405     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Huber, J. and Hansen, D. (1986). Testing the impact of dimensional complexity and affective differences of paired concepts in adaptive conjoint analysis. Adv. Consumer Res. 14, 159-163.
2. Huber, J. and Zwerina, K. (1996). The importance of utility balance in efficient choice designs. J. Marketing Res. 23, 307-317.
3. Krieger, A. M. and Green, P. E. (1991). Designing Pareto Optimal stimuli for multiattribute choice experiments. Marketing Lett. 2, 337-348.
4. Raghavarao, D. (1971). Constructions and Combinatorial Problems in Design of Experiments. John Wiley, New York.
5. Raghavarao, D. and Wiley, J. B. (1998). Estimating main effects with Pareto Optimal subsets. Australian and New Zealand, J. Statist. 40, 425-432.
6. Wiley, J. B. (1978). Selecting Pareto Optimal subsets from multiattribute alternatives. Adv. Consumer Res. 5, 171-174.
7. Zhang, D. (2001). Pareto optimal design in behavioral experiments. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Temple University.