Evaluation of interfacial fracture toughness using cohesive zone model

Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing

Volumn 33, Issue 10, 2002, Pages 1433-1447

  Chandra, Namas ^a  

^a FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

A. Ceramic matrix composites (CMCs); A. Metal matrix composites (MMCs); B. Interface interphase; Polymer matrix composites (PMCs)

Indexed keywords

FRACTURE TOUGHNESS; INTERFACES (MATERIALS); METALLIC MATRIX COMPOSITES; RESIDUAL STRESSES; STIFFNESS;

INTERFACIAL FRACTURE TOUGHNESS;

CERAMIC MATRIX COMPOSITES;

EID: 0036815023     PISSN: 1359835X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1359-835X(02)00173-2     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (42)

1. Chandra N., Li H., Shet C., Ghonem H. Some issues in the application of cohesive zone models for metal-ceramic interfaces. Int J Solids Struct. 39:2002;2827-2855.
2. Rice J.R. Elastic fracture concepts for interfacical cracks. J Appl Mech. 55:1988;98-103.
3. Arnold S.M., Arya V.K., Melis M.E. Elastic/plastic analysis of advanced composites investigating the use of the compliant layer concept in reducing residual stresses resulting from processing. Technical report NASA TM 103204, NASA; 1990.
4. Arnold S.M., Melis M.E. Influence of engineered interfaces on residual stresses and mechanical response in metal matrix composites. Technical report NASA TM 105438, NASA; 1992.
5. Bailey J.E., Parvizi A. J Mater Sci. 16:1981;649.
6. Hall E.L., Ritter A.M. Structure and behavior of metal/ceramic interfaces in Ti alloy/SiC metal matrix composites. J Mater Res. 8:(5):1993;1158-1168.
7. Pang C.H., Jeng S.M., Yang J.M. Interface control and design for SiC fiber reinforced titanium aluminate composites. J Mater Res. 8:(8):1993;2040-2053.
8. Jayaraman K., Reifsnider K.L., Swain R.E. Elastic and thermal effects in the inter-phase. Part II. Comments on modeling studies. J Compos Technol Res. 15:(1):1993;14-22.
9. Clyne T.W., Withers P.J. An introduction to metal matrix composites. 1993;Cambridge University Press, UK.
10. Majumdar B.S., Newaz G.M. Inelastic deformation of metal matrix composites: plasticity and damage mechanisms. Philos Mag A. 66:(2):1992;187-212.
11. Jayaraman K., Reifsnider K.L., Swain R.E. Elastic and thermal effects in the inter-phase. Part I. Comments on characterization methods. J Compos Technol Res. 15:(1):1993;3-13.
12. 4 composites. NASA TM 103739; 1991.
13. Bechel V.T., Sottos N.R. Application of debond length measurements to examine the mechanics of fiber pushout. J Mech Phys Solids. 46:1998;1675-1697.
14. Ananth C.R., Chandra N. Numerical modeling of fiber push-out test in metallic and intermetallic matrix composites - mechanics of the failure processes. J Compos Mater. 29:1995;1488-1514.
15. Ananth C.R., Chandra N. Evaluation of interfacial shear properties of metal matrix composites from fiber push-out tests. Mech Compos Mater Struct. 2:1995;309-328.
16. Chandra N., Ananth C.R. Analysis of interfacial behavior in MMCs and IMCs using thin-slice push-out tests. Compos Sci Technol. 54:1995;87-100.
17. Ananth C.R., Chandra N. Elevated temperature interfacial behavior MMCs: a computational study. Composites. 27:1996;805-813.
18. Ananth C.R., Mukherjee S., Chandra N. Evaluation of fracture toughness of MMC interface using thin-slice push-out tests. Scripta Mater. 36:1997;1333-1338.
19. Hashin Z. Failure criteria for unidirectional fibre composites. J Appl Mech. 47:1980;329-334.
20. Wisnom M.R. Micromechanical modeling of the transver tensile ductility of unidirectional silicon carbide/6061 aluminum. J Compos Technol Res. 14:1992;61-69.
21. Raju I.S., Shivakumar K.N. An equivalent domain integral method in the two-dimensional analysis of mixed mode crack problems. Engng Fract Mech. 37:(4):1990;707-725.
22. Ananth C.R., Mukherjee S., Chandra N. Effect of residual stresses on the interfacial fracture behavior of metal-matrix composites. Compos Sci Technol. 57:1997;1501-1512.
23. MARC analysis corporation, MARC Version: K5, User Manuals; 1992.
24. Pickard S.M., Miracle D.B., Majumdar B.S., Kendig K.L., Rothenflu L., Coker D. An experimental study of residual fiber strain in Ti-15-3 continuous fiber composites. AMET. 1995;333-340.
25. Nimmer R.P., Bankert R.J., Russel E.S., Smith G.A., Wright P.K. Micromechanical modeling of fiber-matrix interface effects in transversely loaded SiC/Ti-6-4 metal matrix composites. J Compos Technol Res. 13:(1):1991;3-13.
26. Deng X. An asymptotic analysis of stationary and moving cracks with frictional contact along bimaterial interfaces and in homogeneous solids. Int J Solids Struct. 31:1994;2407-2429.
27. Grande D.H., Mandell J.F., Hong K.C.C. Fiber-matrix bond strength studies of glass, ceramic, and metal matrix composites. J Mater Sci. 23:(1):1988;311-328.
28. Majumdar B.S., Newaz Z.M. Isothermal fatigue mechanisms in Ti-based metal matrix composites. Technical Report NASA CR 191181; 1993.
29. Fox K.M., Bowen P. Interface properties and fatigue crack growth in Ti-β 21S/SCS-6 composites. Fujishiro S., Aylon D., Kishi T. Metallurgy and technology of practical titanium alloys. 1994;333-340 The Minerals, Metal and materials Society.
30. Majumdar B.S., Miracle D.S. Interface measurements and applications in fiber reinforced MMCs. J Key Engng Mater - Special Issue Interf Compos Laminated Struct. 116/117:1996;153-172.
31. Eldridge J.I., Ebihara B.T. Fiber-out testing apparatus for elevated temperatures. J Mater Res. 9:(4):1994;1035-1042.
32. Roman I., Jero P.D. Interface shear behavior of two titanium-based SCS-6 model composites. Miracle D.B., Anton D.L., Grave J.A. Intermetallic matrix composites II. MRS Symposium Proceedings. 273:1992;337-342 Materials Research Society.
33. Needleman A. Micromechanical modeling of interfacial decohesion. Ultramicroscopy. 40:(3):1992;203-214.
34. Xu X.P., Needleman A. Void nucleation by inclusion debonding in a crystal matrix. Modelling Simul Mater Sci Engng. 1:(2):1993;111-132.
35. Geubelle P.H., Baylor J. Impact-induced delamination of laminated composites: a 2D simulation. Compos, Part B: Engng. 29:(5):1998;589-602.
36. Kallas M.N., Koss D.A., Hahn H.T., Hellman J.R. Interfacial stress state present in a thin-slice fibre push-out test. J Mater Sci. 27:(14):1992;3821-3826.
37. ABAQUS Manual, Version 5.8, Hibbit, Karlsson and Sorensen, Inc, USA; 1998.
38. Kroupa J.L., Neu R.W. The non-isothermal viscoplastic behavior of a titanium-matrix composite. Compos Engng. 4:(9):1994;965-977.
39. Osborne D., Ghonem H., Chandra N. Interface behavior of Ti matrix composites at elevated temperature. Compos, Part A: Appl Sci Manufact. 32:(3-4):2000;545-553.
40. Davidson D.L. The micromechanics of fatigue crack growth at 25 °C in Ti-6A1-4V reinforced with SCS-6 fibers. Metall Trans. 23A:1992;865-879.
41. Kerans R.J., Parthasarathy T.A. Theoretical analysis of the fiber pullout and push out tests. J Am Ceram Soc. 74:(7):1991;1585-1596.
42. Li H., Chandra N. Analysis of crack growth and crack-tip plasticity in ductile materials using cohesive zone models. Int J Plast. 2002;. in press.