A comparison of the in vivo performance of the 19-mm St. Jude Medical Hemodynamic Plus and 21-mm standard valve

Annals of Thoracic Surgery

Volumn 74, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 1120-1124

  Niinami, Hiroshi ^a,b   Aomi, Shigeyuki ^a   Tomioka, Hideyuki ^a   Nakano, Kiyoharu ^a   Koyanagi, Hitoshi ^a  

^a TOKYO WOMEN'S MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b TOKYO WOMEN'S MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTICOAGULANT AGENT; LACTATE DEHYDROGENASE;

ADULT; AGED; AORTA VALVE PROSTHESIS; AORTA VALVE REPLACEMENT; AORTA VALVE STENOSIS; BLEEDING; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONFERENCE PAPER; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEMODYNAMICS; HEMOLYSIS; HUMAN; LACTATE DEHYDROGENASE BLOOD LEVEL; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MORBIDITY; MORTALITY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SAINT JUDE HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SURVIVAL; THROMBOEMBOLISM; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AORTIC VALVE; AORTIC VALVE STENOSIS; DEOXYRIBONUCLEASES, TYPE II SITE-SPECIFIC; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HEMODYNAMIC PROCESSES; HUMANS; L-LACTATE DEHYDROGENASE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSTHESIS DESIGN;

EID: 0036799936     PISSN: 00034975     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0003-4975(02)03891-2     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Fisher J. Comparative study of the hydrodynamic function of the size 19mm and 21 mm St. Jude Medical Hemodynamic Plus bileaflet heart valves. J Heart Valve Dis 1994;3:75-80.
2. Pombo JF, Troy BL, Russel RO Jr. Left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction by echocardiography. Circulation 1971;43:480-90.
3. Devereux RN, Reichek N. Echocardiographic determination of left ventricle mass in man. Anatomic validation of the method. Circulation 1977;55:613-9.
4. Edmunds LH Jr, Clark RE, Cohn LH, Miller DC, Weisel RD. Guidelines for reporting morbidity and mortality after cardiac valvular operations. Ann Thorac Surg 1988;46:257-9.
5. Henry WL, Bonow RO, Borer JS. Evaluation of aortic valve replacement in patients with valvular aortic stenosis. Circulation 1980;61:814-25.
6. DePaulis R, Sommariva L, Russo F, et al. Doppler echocardiography evaluation of the CarboMedics valve in patients with small aortic annulus and valve prosthesis-body surface area mismatch. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1994;108:57-62.
7. Yun KL, Jamieson WR, Khonsari S, Burr LH, Munro AI, Sintek CF. Prosthetic-patient mismatch: hemodynamic comparison of stented and stentless aortic valves. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999;11(suppl 1):98-102.
8. Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG. Hemodynamic and clinical impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch in the aortic valve position and its prevention. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;36:1131-41.
9. Carrel T, Zingg U, Jenni R, Aeschbacher B, Turina MI. Early in vivo experience with the hemodynamic plus St. Jude Medical heart valves in patients with narrowed aortic annulus. Ann Thorac Surg 1996;61:1418-22.
10. Hayashida N, Isomura T, Hisatomi K, et al. Hemodynamic performance of the St. Jude Medical Hemodynamic Plus Valve. Artificial Organs 1997;21:916-21.
11. Hachida M, Koyanagi H, Nonoyama M, Bonkohara Y, Saitou S, Nakamura K. Serial hemodynamic study after aortic valve replacement in patients with narrow aortic roots. J Heart Valve Dis 1998;7:81-5.
12. Ismeno G, Renzulli A, De Feo M, Corte AD, Covino FE, Cotrufo M. Standard versus Hemodynamic Plus 19-mm St Jude Medical aortic valves. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2001;121:723-8.
13. Medalion B, Blackstone EH, Lytle BW, White J, Arnold JH, Cosgrove DM. Aortic valve replacement: is valve size important? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2000;119:963-74.
14. Dumesnil JG, Honos GN, Lemieux M, Beauchemin J. Validation and application of indexed aortic prosthetic valve areas calculated by Doppler echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 1990;16:637-43.
15. Tatineni S, Barner HB, Pearson AC, Halbe D, Woodruff R, Labovitz AJ. Rest and exercise evaluation of St. Jude Medical and Medtronic Hall prostheses. Circulation 1989;80(suppl 1):16-23.
16. Sim EKW, Orszulak TA, Schaff HV, Shub C. Influence of prosthesis size on change in left ventricular mass following aortic valve replacement. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1994;8:293-7.
17. Lund O, Emmertsen K, Nielsen T, et al. Impact of size mismatch and left ventricular function on performance of the St. Jude disc valve after aortic valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg 1997;63:1227-34.
18. Knott E, Reul H, Knoch M, Steinseifer U, Rau G. In vitro comparison of aortic heart valve prostheses. Part I: mechanical valves. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1988;96:952-6.