15. Image-guided breast biopsy

International Journal of Clinical Practice

Volumn 56, Issue 8, 2002, Pages 583-587

  Ralleigh, G ^a   Michell, M J ^a  

^a KING S COLLEGE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASPIRATION BIOPSY; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CANCER; CARCINOMA IN SITU; CLINICAL FEATURE; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; COMPLICATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; COST CONTROL; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; ECHOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAMMOGRAPHY; PERCUTANEOUS BIOPSY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STEREOTAXIS;

BIOPSY, NEEDLE; BREAST; BREAST NEOPLASMS; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; HUMANS; MASS SCREENING; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, INTERVENTIONAL; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, MAMMARY;

EID: 0036775592     PISSN: 13685031     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. NHS Breast Screening Programme & British Association of Surgical Oncology. An audit of screen detected breast cancers for the year of screening April 1999 to March 2000. NHS Breast Screening Programme BASO Audit, 2001.
2. Pisano ED, Fajardo LL, Tsimikas J. Rate of insufficient samples for fine-needle aspiration of nonpalpable breast lesions in a multicenter clinical trial: the Radiologic Diagnostic Oncology Group 5 Study. Cancer 2001; 82: 678-688.
3. Britton P. Fine needle aspiration or core biopsy. Breast 2001; 8: 1-4.
4. Brenner RJ, Bassett LW, Fajardo LL et al. Stereotactic core-needle breast biopsy: a multi-institutional prospective trial. Radiology 2001; 218:866-872.
5. Jackman RJ, Nowels KW, Rodriguez-Soto J et al. Stereotactic, automated, large-core needle biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions: false-negative and histologic underestimation rates after long-term follow-up. Radiology 1999; 210: 799-805.
6. Parker SH, Jobe WE, Dennis MA et al. US-guided automated large-core breast biopsy. Radiology 1993; 187: 511.
7. Parker SH, Burbank F, Jackman R et al. Percutaneous large core breast biopsy: a multi-institutional prospective trial. Radiology 1994; 193: 359-364.
8. Liberman L, Dershaw DD. Stereotactic core biopsy of breast carcinoma: accuracy at predicting invasion. Am J Roentgenol 1995; 165: 554.
9. Liberman L, Dershaw DD, Glassman JR et al. Analysis of cancers not diagnosed at stereotactic core breast biopsy. Radiology 1997; 203(1): 151-157.
10. Jackman R, Burbank F, Parker S et al. Stereotactic breast biopsy of non-palpable lesions: determinants of ductal carcinoma in situ underestimation rates. Radiology 200 1; 218(2): 497-502.
11. Burbank F. Stereotactic breast biopsy of atypical ductal hyperplasia and ductal carcinoma in situ lesions: improved accuracy with directional, vacuum-assisted biopsy. Radiology 1997; 202(3): 843-847.
12. Liberman L. Advanced breast biopsy instrumentation: analysis of published experience. Am J Roentgenol 1999; 172: 1413-1416.
13. Liberman L, Vuolo M, Dershaw DD et al. Epithelial displacement after stereotactic 11-gauge directional vacuum-assisted breast biopsy. Am J Roentgenol 1999; 172(3): 677-681.
14. Stolier A, Skinner J, Levine EA. A prospective study of seeding of the skin after core biopsy of the breast. Am J Surg 2000; 180(2): 104-107.
15. Dershaw DD, Morris EA, Liberman L. Nondiagnostic stereotaxic core breast biopsy: Results of rebiopsy. Radiology 2001; 198: 323-325.
16. Liberman L, Cohen MA, Dershaw DD et al. Atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed at stereotaxic core biopsy of breast lesions an indication for surgical biopsy. Am J Roentgenol 1995; 164: 1111-1113.