Evaluation of electroacoustic test signals II: Development and cross-validation of correction factors

Ear and Hearing

Volumn 23, Issue 5, 2002, Pages 488-498

  Scollie, Susan D ^a   Steinberg, M Jane ^a   Seewald, Richard C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA BASE; FREQUENCY DISCRIMINATION; HEARING AID; HUMAN; NONLINEAR SYSTEM; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SIGNAL PROCESSING; SPEECH; SPEECH AUDIOMETRY; VALIDATION PROCESS;

EID: 0036775454     PISSN: 01960202     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00003446-200210000-00010     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. ASHA (1997). Guidelines for hearing aid fitting for adults. ASHA Desk Reference-Audiology, 2, 123-130a.
2. Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1975). Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
3. Cole, W., & Sinclair, S. T. (1998). The Audioscan RM500 Speech-map/DSL fitting system. Trends in Amplification, 3, 125-139.
4. Cox, R. M., & Flamme, G. A. (1998). Accuracy of predicted ear canal speech levels using the VIOLA input/output-based fitting strategy. Ear and Hearing, 19, 139-148.
5. Dillon, H. (1993). Hearing aid evaluation: Predicting speech gain from insertion gain. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 36, 621-633.
6. Etymonic Design (1999). Fitting Hearing Aids with the Speech-Map®/DSL® Fitting System Using the Audioscan ®RM500. (Application Note 99-09). Dorchester, Ontario: Etymonic Design.
7. Osborne, J., & Waters, E. (2001). Four assumptions of multiple regression that researchers should always test. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 8. Available online: http://ericae.net/pare/Home.htm.
8. Pediatric Working Group (1996). Amplification for infants and children with hearing loss. American Journal of Audiology, 5, 53-68.
9. Scollie, S. D., & Seewald, R. C. (2002). Evaluation of electroacoustic test signals I: Comparison with amplified speech. Ear and Hearing, 23, 477-487.
10. Seewald, R. C., Cornelisse, L. E., Ramji, K. V., Sinclair, S. T., Moodie, K. S., & Jamieson, D. G. (1997). A Software Implementation of the Desired Sensation Level (DSL [I/O]) Method for Fitting Linear Gain and Wide-Dynamic-Range Compression Hearing Instruments: Version 4.1a, User's Manual. London, Ontario: The University of Western Ontario.
11. Seewald, R. C., Moodie, K. S., Sinclair, S. T., & Scollie, S. D. (1999). Predictive validity of a procedure for pediatric hearing instrument fitting. American Journal of Audiology, 8, 143-152.
12. Stelmachowicz, P. G., Kopun, J., Mace, A. L., & Lewis, D. E. (1996). Measures of hearing aid gain for real speech. Ear and Hearing, 17, 520-527.
13. Stelmachowicz, P. G., Lewis, D. E., Seewald, R. C., & Hawkins, D. B. (1990). Complex and pure tone signals in the evaluation of hearing-aid characteristics. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 33, 380-385.
14. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1996). Using Multivariate Statistics. New York: Harper Collins College Publishers.