Evaluation of electroacoustic test signals I: Comparison with amplified speech

Ear and Hearing

Volumn 23, Issue 5, 2002, Pages 477-487

  Scollie, Susan D ^a   Seewald, Richard C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE SEVERITY; EVALUATION; HEARING AID; HEARING LOSS; HUMAN; PHONEME; SIGNAL PROCESSING; SPEECH; SPEECH AUDIOMETRY; VALIDATION PROCESS;

EID: 0036773879     PISSN: 01960202     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00003446-200210000-00009     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. ASHA (1997). Guidelines for hearing aid fitting for adults. ASHA Desk Reference-Audiology, 2, 123-130a.
2. Cole, W., & Sinclair, S. T. (1998). The Audioscan RM500 speechmap/DSL fitting system. Trends in Amplification, 3, 125-139.
3. Cornelisse, L. E., Gagné, J. P., Seewald, R. C. (1991). Ear level recordings of the long-term average spectrum of speech. Ear and Hearing, 12, 47-54.
4. Cox, R. M., & Flamme, G. A. (1998). Accuracy of predicted ear canal speech levels using the VIOLA input/output-based fitting strategy. Ear and Hearing, 19, 139-148.
5. Cox, R. M., Mateisch, J. S., & Moore, J. N. (1988). Distribution of short-term rms levels in conversational speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 84, 1100-1104.
6. Cox, R. M., & Moore, J. N. (1988). Composite speech spectrum for hearing aid gain prescriptions. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 31, 102-107.
7. Dillon, H. (1996). Compression? Yes, but for low or high frequencies, for low or high intensities, and with what response times? Ear and Hearing, 17, 287-307.
8. Frye, G. J. (1986). High speed real time hearing aid analysis. The Hearing Journal, 39(6), 21-26.
9. Kirk, R. E. (1995). Experimental Design: Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences. Third Edition. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing.
10. Kuk, F. K., & Ludvigsen, C. (1999). Variables affecting the use of prescriptive formulae to fit modern nonlinear hearing aids. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 10, 458-465.
11. Olsen, W. A. (1998). Average speech levels and spectra in various speaking/listening conditions: A summary of the Pearson, Bennett, & Fidell (1977) report. American Journal of Audiology, 7, 1-5.
12. Pediatric Working Group (1996). Amplification for infants and children with hearing loss. American Journal of Audiology, 5, 53-68.
13. Seewald, R. C., Cornelisse, L. E., Ramji, K. V., Sinclair, S. T., Moodie, K. S., & Jamieson, D. G. (1997). A Software Implementation of the Desired Sensation Level (DSL [I/O]) Method for Fitting Linear Gain and Wide-Dynamic-Range Compression Hearing Instruments: Version 4.1a, User's Manual. London, Ontario: The University of Western Ontario.
14. Seewald, R. C., Moodie, K. S., Sinclair, S. T., Scollie, S. D. (1999). Predictive validity of a procedure for pediatric hearing instrument fitting. American Journal of Audiology, 8, 143-152.
15. Stelmachowicz, P. G., Kopun, J., Mace, A. L., & Lewis, D. E. (1996). Measures of hearing aid gain for real speech. Ear and Hearing, 17, 520-527.
16. Stelmachowicz, P. G., Lewis, D. E., Seewald, R. C., & Hawkins, D. B. (1990). Complex and pure tone signals in the evaluation of hearing-aid characteristics. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 33, 380-385.
17. Stevens, K. N. (1998). Acoustic Phonetics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.