Apprentissages et actions: Étude comparative de structures multipartites

Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 217-230

  Turcotte, Marie France ^a   Dancause, Christine ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DU QUÉBEC À MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^b Gina Cody School of Engineering and Computer Science   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036771267     PISSN: 08250383     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1936-4490.2002.tb00269.x     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Abernathy, D.J. (1999). A chat with Chris Argyris. Training & Development, 53 (5), 80-84.
2. Andranovich, C. (1995). Achieving consensus in public decision making: Applying interest-based problem solving to the challenges of intergovernmental collaboration. Journal of Applied Behavorial Science, 31 (4), 429-442.
3. Argyris, C. & Schon, D.A. (1978). Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective. London: Addison-Wesley.
4. Babin, R. (1995). Les enjeux de la régulation écologique: Des contraintes du marché à l'action des citoyens. Document de travail, Moncton.
5. Barouch, G. (1989). La décision en miettes, Systèmes de pensée et d'action à l'oeuvre dans la gestion des milieux naturels. Paris: Édition l'Harmattan.
6. Burroughs, R. (1999). When stakeholders choose: Process, knowledge, and motivation in water quality decisions. Society and Natural Resources, 12, 797-809.
7. Comité ZIP Ville-Marie. (1998). Plan d'action et de réhabilitation écologique des secteurs nord du lac Saint-Louis, des rapides de Lachine et des bassins de Lapralrie. Montréal.
8. Comité ZIP Ville-Marie. (1999). Les rejets d'eau de débordement dans la région montréalaise. Document de présentation des réflexions et recommandations faites à la Commission d'enquête sur la gestion de l'eau au Québec. Audiences publiques sur la gestion de l'eau, Montréal, Canada.
9. Dorcey, A. & McDaniels, T. (2001). L'implicaion des citoyens en environnement: attentes élevées et résultats incertalns. Dans E.A. Parson (Ed.), Gérer l'environnement (pp. 249-302). Montréal: Les presses de l'Université de Montréal.
10. Driscoll, C. (1995). Diversity, dialogue, and learning: The case of the Forest Round Table on Sustainable Development. Thèse de doctorat, Queen's University, Kingston, ON.
11. Easterby-Smith, M., Burgoyne, J., & Araujo, L. (1999). Organizational learning: Current debates and opportunities. In M. Easterby-Smith, L. Auraujo, & J. Burgoyne (Eds.), Organizational learning and the learning organization: Developments in theory and practice. London: Sage.
12. Foldy, E.G. & Creed, D. (1999). Action learning, fragmentation and the interaction of single-, double-, and triple-loop change: A case of gay and lesbian workplace advocacy. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 35 (2), 207-227.
13. Font, N. (1998). New instruments of citizen participation. Barcelone: Institut de Ciènces Politique i Socials.
14. Gray, B. (1985). Conditions facilitating inter-organizational collaboration. Human Relations, 38 (10), 911-936.
15. Gray, B. (1989). Collaborating: Finding common ground for multiparty problems. San Franscisco: Jossey Bass.
16. Hakansson, H., Havila, V., & Pederson, A.C. (1999). Learning in networks. Industrial Marketing Management, 28 (5), 443-452.
17. Hjalager, A.M. (1999). Interorganizational learning systems. Human Systems Management, 18 (1), 23-33.
18. Huber, G.P. (1991). Organizational learning: The contributing process and the literatures. Organization Science, 12 (1), 88-115.
19. Huxham, C. (1993). Collaborative capability: An intra-organizational perspective on collaboration advantage. Public Money & Management, 13 (3), 21-28.
20. Kathlene, L. & Martin, J.A. (1991). Enhancing citizen participation: Panels perspectives and policy formation. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 10 (1), 44-63.
21. Keeble, D., Lawson, C., Moore B., & Wilkinson, F. (1999). Collective learning processes, networking and 'institutional thickness' in the Cambridge region. Regional Studies, 33 (4), 319-332.
22. Knight, L. (2002). Network learning: Exploring learning by interorganizational networks. Human Relations, 55 (4), 427-454.
23. Kogut, B. (1988). Joint ventures: Theoretical and empirical perspectives. Strategic Management Journal, 9, 319-332.
24. Landre, B.K. & Knuth, B.A. (1993). Success of citizen adviso-committees in consensus-based water resources planning in the Great Lakes Basin. Society and Natural Resources, 6, 229-257.
25. Lauber, T.B. & Knuth, B.A. (2000). Citizen participation in natural resource management: A synthesis of HDRU research. HDRU Series, no 00-7. (site http://www.dnr.cornell.edu/hrdu/PUBS/HDRUReport00-7.pdf)
26. Lepage. L. (2001). Le Saint-Laurent, théâtre d'une nouvelle expérimentation sociale. Découvrir, 22 (2), 34-37.
27. Leroy, F. (1998). L'apprentissage organisationnel: une revue critique de la littérature. Actes du Colloque AIMS. (site http://www.aims.essc.asso.fr)
28. Limoges, C. & Doray, P. (1994). Le débat public comme apprentissage social et comme régulation constituante: le cas de « environnementalisation ». Dans B. Scheile (Ed.), Quand la science se fait culture. Montréal: Les Presses de l'Université du Québec.
29. Lipshitz, R. & Popper, M. (2000). Organizational learning: Mechanisms, culture and feasibility. Management Learning, 31 (2), 181-197.
30. McKinney, M.J. (1988). Water resources planning: A collaborative, consensus-building approach. Society and Natural Resources, 1 (4), 335-249.
31. Nonaka, I. & Takeuchi, H. (1997). The knowledge creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press. Ingham, M. (1995). La connaissance créatrice: la dynamique de l'entreprise apprenante. DeBoeck Université.
32. Nonaka, I. & Takeuchi, H. (1997). The knowledge creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press. Ingham, M. (1995). La connaissance créatrice: la dynamique de l'entreprise apprenante. DeBoeck Université.
33. Pasquero, J. (1991). Supraorganizational collaboration: The Canadian environmental experiment. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 27 (1), 38-64.
34. Poell, R.F., Chivers, G.E., Van der Krogt, F.J., & Wildemeersch, D.A. (2000). Learning-network theory: Organising the dynamic relationships between learning and work. Management Learning, 31(1), 25-49.
35. Roome, N.J. (1998). Changing course. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
36. Saint-Laurent Vision 2000. (2000). Rapport biennal 1998-2000. Québec: Bureau de la coordination de SLV2000.
37. Seely Brown, J. & Duguid, P. (2001). Knowledge and organization: A social-practice perspective. Organization Science, 12 (2), 198-213.
38. Siemer, W.F. & Decker, D.J. (1990). An evaluation of public meetings held by the DEC Bureau of Wildlife. HDRU Series. Cornell University.
39. Stratégies Saint-Laurent. (1999). La gestion de l'eau au Québec, Cahier de présentation des réflexions et des recommandations faites à la Commission d'enquête sur la gestion de l'eau au Québec. Audiences publiques sur la gestion de l'eau, Montréal, Canada.
40. Trist, E. (1983). Referent organizations and the development of inter-organizational domains. Human Relations, 36 (3), 269-284.
41. Van Deusen, C.A. & Mueller, C. (1999). Learning in acquisitions: Understanding the relationship between exploration, exploitation and performance. The Learning Organization, 6 (4), 186-193.
42. Vickers, I. & Cordey-Hayes, M. (1999). Cleaner production and organizational learning. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 11 (1), 75-94.
43. Vorley, W.T. (1998). Thirty cabbages: Diversity of perspective to catalyze redesign in the agrochemical industry. In N.J. Roome (Ed.), Sustainability strategies for industry: The future of corporate practice (pp. 185-201). Washington, DC: Island Press.
44. Weick, K.E. (1984). Small wins: Redefining the scale of social problems. American Psychologist, 39 (1), 40-49.